Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/750,712

HIGH EFFICIENCY ELECTRODIALYSIS FLUID PURIFICATION DEVICE AND METHOD

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
May 23, 2022
Examiner
BRAZIN, JACQUELINE
Art Unit
1798
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois
OA Round
2 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
335 granted / 507 resolved
+1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +54% interview lift
Without
With
+54.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
550
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
48.8%
+8.8% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 507 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status Claims 1-17 are pending and are examined. Claim 18 is cancelled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yossifon (US Pub 2018/0369811; previously cited). Regarding Claim 1, Yossifon teaches an electrodialysis fluid purification device, comprising a fluid output from an upper part of a first fluid reservoir; one or more ion permselective elements at a surface on or near the bottom of the first reservoir, the one or more ion permselective elements being arranged to provide one or more small area points or lines; a fluid connection to a second fluid reservoir on an opposite side of the one or more ion permselective elements; and electrodes and a power supply to create a voltage differential across the one or more ion permselective elements ([0075] Ion permselective medium 11 can be any medium made, at least in part from a permselective material, and can have any structure, including, without limitation, a nanostructure, a nanoporous membrane and an electrode. The permselective medium 11 can, in some embodiments, be embodied as a permselective nanochannel, such as, but not limited to, nanochannel 10. [0077] System 20 can further comprise an arrangement of electrodes 28 arranged to generate an electric field across permselective medium 11. This can be done by connecting electrodes 28 to a power source 36, which may effect an electrical potential difference across permselective medium 11. Via the CP effect, ionic concentration gradients are formed in microchannel 12, near sides 24 and 26 of permselective medium 11. FIG. 2 illustrates two electrodes 28a and 28b positioned outside microchannel 12. These electrodes do not necessarily be positioned in the vicinity of the permselective medium 11, but can also be applied further away (e.g., via electrodes immersed within the reservoirs of the inlets/outlets of the microchannels). However, this need not necessarily be the case, since, for some applications, it may be desired to position electrodes 28 inside microchannel 12. [0111] The term “permselective material,” as used herein, refers to an ion permeable material having the property that the ion transport number (also called the transference number, and is the fraction of the total current carried by a given ion) through the material is higher for ionic species having a certain charge sign than for ionic species having the opposite charge sign.). Regarding Claim 2, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the one or more ion permselective elements comprise a plurality of elements at each of a plurality of small area interfaces ([0095] Thus, sensor system 22 optionally and preferably mimics a MEMS based thermal flow-meter sensor since it allows measuring the flow (a) at the permselective medium; (b) in proximity to the permselective medium; and/or (c) farther from the permselective medium, downstream therefrom. [0103] FIG. 3C illustrates an embodiment in which additional sensing elements 38e, 38f are positioned downstream the flow relative to membrane 11. These sensing elements can be used to measure the elapsed time for the depletion ionic concentration layer to propagate from element 38a to element 38e (interchangeably referred to as the time-of-flight of the depletion ionic concentration layer) and/or the enrichment ionic concentration layer to propagate from element 38c to element 38f (interchangeably referred to as the time-of-flight of the enrichment ionic concentration layer). [0116] A variety of permselective materials may be employed for medium 11.). Regarding Claim 3, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 2, wherein the plurality of elements is arranged with edges of the elements facing a volume of the first reservoir ([0102] FIG. 3B illustrates a state in which flow is forced into microchannel 12. The pattern of depletion and enrichment ionic concentration layers is changed due to the flow in branches 32 and 34, respectively. This change is sensed, for example, as the difference between the ion concentration (or proxy thereof) measured by sensing element 38a and the ion concentration (or proxy thereof) measured by sensing element 38b, both within the depletion ionic concentration deformed layer. [0103] FIG. 3C illustrates an embodiment in which additional sensing elements 38e, 38f are positioned downstream the flow relative to membrane 11. These sensing elements can be used to measure the elapsed time for the depletion ionic concentration layer to propagate from element 38a to element 38e (interchangeably referred to as the time-of-flight of the depletion ionic concentration layer) and/or the enrichment ionic concentration layer to propagate from element 38c to element 38f (interchangeably referred to as the time-of-flight of the enrichment ionic concentration layer). [0116] A variety of permselective materials may be employed for medium 11.). Regarding Claim 4, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the one or more ion permselective elements are arranged in one or more microchannels between the first fluid reservoir and the fluid connection to the second fluid reservoir ([0102] FIG. 3B illustrates a state in which flow is forced into microchannel 12. The pattern of depletion and enrichment ionic concentration layers is changed due to the flow in branches 32 and 34, respectively. This change is sensed, for example, as the difference between the ion concentration (or proxy thereof) measured by sensing element 38a and the ion concentration (or proxy thereof) measured by sensing element 38b, both within the depletion ionic concentration deformed layer. [0103] FIG. 3C illustrates an embodiment in which additional sensing elements 38e, 38f are positioned downstream the flow relative to membrane 11. These sensing elements can be used to measure the elapsed time for the depletion ionic concentration layer to propagate from element 38a to element 38e (interchangeably referred to as the time-of-flight of the depletion ionic concentration layer) and/or the enrichment ionic concentration layer to propagate from element 38c to element 38f (interchangeably referred to as the time-of-flight of the enrichment ionic concentration layer). [0116] A variety of permselective materials may be employed for medium 11.). Regarding Claim 6, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the wherein the one or more ion permselective elements is interfaced into a side surface of the first reservoir ([0102] FIG. 3B illustrates a state in which flow is forced into microchannel 12. The pattern of depletion and enrichment ionic concentration layers is changed due to the flow in branches 32 and 34, respectively. This change is sensed, for example, as the difference between the ion concentration (or proxy thereof) measured by sensing element 38a and the ion concentration (or proxy thereof) measured by sensing element 38b, both within the depletion ionic concentration deformed layer. [0103] FIG. 3C illustrates an embodiment in which additional sensing elements 38e, 38f are positioned downstream the flow relative to membrane 11. These sensing elements can be used to measure the elapsed time for the depletion ionic concentration layer to propagate from element 38a to element 38e (interchangeably referred to as the time-of-flight of the depletion ionic concentration layer) and/or the enrichment ionic concentration layer to propagate from element 38c to element 38f (interchangeably referred to as the time-of-flight of the enrichment ionic concentration layer). [0116] A variety of permselective materials may be employed for medium 11.). Regarding Claim 7, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the wherein the one or more ion permselective elements is arranged to create a depleted zone that extends into the first reservoir (the element(s) would be capable of arranging a depleted zone. The examiner notes the depleted zone is intended use of the device. [0066] Some embodiments of the present invention induce a concentration polarization (CP) effect for measuring a flow parameter. In this effect local ionic concentration gradients are generated at an interface of fluid and an ion permselective medium upon application of voltage or current across the permselective medium. More specifically an enriched ionic concentration is formed at one side of the permselective medium and a depleted ionic concentration is formed at its opposite side, when both sides interface a fluid.). Regarding Claim 8, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 7, wherein the depleted zone extends up, away and around edges of the one or more ion permselective elements (The examiner notes the depleted zone is intended use of the device and is not required as part of the claimed device). Regarding Claim 9, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the wherein the one or more ion permselective elements is configured to create a microscale interface to a macroscale volume in the first reservoir (the one or more elements are capable of creating a microscale interface to a macroscale volume in the first reservoir). Regarding Claim 10, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the one or more ion permselective elements comprises a discontinuous ion permselective element ([0111] The term “permselective material,” as used herein, refers to an ion permeable material having the property that the ion transport number (also called the transference number, and is the fraction of the total current carried by a given ion) through the material is higher for ionic species having a certain charge sign than for ionic species having the opposite charge sign. [0112] In some embodiments of the present invention permselective material has the property that the transport number through the material is higher for ion of one species than for ions of another species. [0113] For example, in a permselective material such as a cation exchange membrane, cations pass through the material more easily (i.e., while experiencing less resistive force) than anions. In a permselective material such as an anion exchange membrane, anions pass through the material more easily (i.e., while experiencing less resistive force) than cations. [0114] A permselective material is different from a porous structure that does not discriminate among differently charged ionic species as the species pass through the porous structure. [0115] In some embodiments of the present invention the permselective material comprises a cation exchange material which is non-preamble to anions, and in some embodiments of the present invention the permselective material comprises an anion exchange material, which is non-preamble to cations. [0116] A variety of permselective materials may be employed for medium 11. Representative examples including, without limitation, the sulfonic acid substituted perfluorocarbon polymers of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,036,714; the primary amine substituted polymers described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,085,071; the polyamine substituted polymers of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,030,988; and the carboxylic acid substituted polymers described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,065,366. All of the teachings of these patents are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.) . Regarding Claim 11, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 1, wherein the one or more ion permselective elements presents a small surface area compared to surface portions of a volume of the first reservoir to which it is exposed (Figs. 3A and 3B, the area for the one or more elements is smaller than the surface portion of a volume of the first reservoir). Regarding Claim 12, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 11, wherein the small surface area of the one or more ion permselective elements is 50% or less than the surface portions of the volume (Figs. 3A and 3B, the area for the one or more elements is smaller than the surface portion of a volume of the first reservoir). Regarding Claim 13, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 12, wherein the small surface area of the one or more ion permselective elements is 20% or less than the surface portions of the volume (Figs. 3A and 3B, the area for the one or more elements is smaller than the surface portion of a volume of the first reservoir). Regarding Claim 14, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 11, wherein the one or more ion permselective elements are arranged to present a microscale interface to a macroscale volume of the first fluid reservoir (The microscale interface is a line which would be a 1D interface and the reservoir has a 3D volume. [0102] FIG. 3B illustrates a state in which flow is forced into microchannel 12. The pattern of depletion and enrichment ionic concentration layers is changed due to the flow in branches 32 and 34, respectively. This change is sensed, for example, as the difference between the ion concentration (or proxy thereof) measured by sensing element 38a and the ion concentration (or proxy thereof) measured by sensing element 38b, both within the depletion ionic concentration deformed layer. [0103] FIG. 3C illustrates an embodiment in which additional sensing elements 38e, 38f are positioned downstream the flow relative to membrane 11. These sensing elements can be used to measure the elapsed time for the depletion ionic concentration layer to propagate from element 38a to element 38e (interchangeably referred to as the time-of-flight of the depletion ionic concentration layer) and/or the enrichment ionic concentration layer to propagate from element 38c to element 38f (interchangeably referred to as the time-of-flight of the enrichment ionic concentration layer). [0116] A variety of permselective materials may be employed for medium 11.). Regarding Claim 15, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 14, wherein the one or more ion permselective elements are arranged to present edges of the elements to a volume of the first reservoir ([0102] FIG. 3B illustrates a state in which flow is forced into microchannel 12. The pattern of depletion and enrichment ionic concentration layers is changed due to the flow in branches 32 and 34, respectively. This change is sensed, for example, as the difference between the ion concentration (or proxy thereof) measured by sensing element 38a and the ion concentration (or proxy thereof) measured by sensing element 38b, both within the depletion ionic concentration deformed layer. [0103] FIG. 3C illustrates an embodiment in which additional sensing elements 38e, 38f are positioned downstream the flow relative to membrane 11. These sensing elements can be used to measure the elapsed time for the depletion ionic concentration layer to propagate from element 38a to element 38e (interchangeably referred to as the time-of-flight of the depletion ionic concentration layer) and/or the enrichment ionic concentration layer to propagate from element 38c to element 38f (interchangeably referred to as the time-of-flight of the enrichment ionic concentration layer). [0116] A variety of permselective materials may be employed for medium 11.). Regarding Claim 16, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 15, wherein the microscale interface is a 1D interface and the macroscale volume is a 3D volume (The microscale interface is a line which would be a 1D interface and the reservoir has a 3D volume. [0102] FIG. 3B illustrates a state in which flow is forced into microchannel 12. The pattern of depletion and enrichment ionic concentration layers is changed due to the flow in branches 32 and 34, respectively. This change is sensed, for example, as the difference between the ion concentration (or proxy thereof) measured by sensing element 38a and the ion concentration (or proxy thereof) measured by sensing element 38b, both within the depletion ionic concentration deformed layer. [0103] FIG. 3C illustrates an embodiment in which additional sensing elements 38e, 38f are positioned downstream the flow relative to membrane 11. These sensing elements can be used to measure the elapsed time for the depletion ionic concentration layer to propagate from element 38a to element 38e (interchangeably referred to as the time-of-flight of the depletion ionic concentration layer) and/or the enrichment ionic concentration layer to propagate from element 38c to element 38f (interchangeably referred to as the time-of-flight of the enrichment ionic concentration layer). [0116] A variety of permselective materials may be employed for medium 11.). Regarding Claim 17, Yossifon teaches a fluid purification device, comprising a first reservoir with which an ion permselective element interfaces directly in a 2D to 3D relationship, an outlet channel for the clean water in an upper part of the first reservoir, a input channel into the first reservoir for raw water, an outlet channel at or near the bottom of the first reservoir to remove water that is enriched in contaminants, a second reservoir that is in fluid communication with the first reservoir through the ion permselective element, and electrodes to provide an applied electric field between the first and second reservoirs ([0077] System 20 can further comprise an arrangement of electrodes 28 arranged to generate an electric field across permselective medium 11. This can be done by connecting electrodes 28 to a power source 36, which may effect an electrical potential difference across permselective medium 11. Via the CP effect, ionic concentration gradients are formed in microchannel 12, near sides 24 and 26 of permselective medium 11. FIG. 2 illustrates two electrodes 28a and 28b positioned outside microchannel 12. These electrodes do not necessarily be positioned in the vicinity of the permselective medium 11, but can also be applied further away (e.g., via electrodes immersed within the reservoirs of the inlets/outlets of the microchannels). However, this need not necessarily be the case, since, for some applications, it may be desired to position electrodes 28 inside microchannel 12.). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yossifon (US Pub 2018/0369811), in view of Puetter (US Patent 4,818,409). Regarding Claim 5, Yossifon teaches the device of claim 1 and [0019] According to some embodiments of the invention the permselective medium comprises at least one medium selected from the group consisting of: a nanostructure, a nanoporous membrane and an electrode. Yossifon is silent to the one or more ion permselective elements comprise an ion-permselective nanoporous gel. Puetter teaches in the related art of permselective elements. Suitable ion exchange membranes are conventional permselective cation exchange membranes or anion exchange membranes which are, for example, from 0.1 to 1 mm thick and have a pore diameter of from 1 to 30 .mu.m or a gel-like structure. Membranes of this type are available commercially, for example, under the names .RTM.Selemion, .RTM.Neosepta and .RTM.Nafion. Since a diffusion process is involved, particularly thin membranes, for example those having a thickness of >0.2 mm, are preferred. Cation exchange membranes are used for liberating the organic acids, while anion exchange membranes are required in ion exchange for the liberation of bases. Col. 3, lines 53-65. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have formed the one or more ion permselective elements, as taught by Yossifon, from an ion-permselective nanoporous gel, as taught by Puetter, to allow for a conventional one. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see page 5, filed 12/5/25, with respect to the claim objection have been fully considered and are persuasive. The objection to claim 7 has been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments, see page 5, filed 12/5/25, with respect to the 112b rejections have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 112b rejections of claims 7 and 8 has been withdrawn. Applicant's arguments filed 12/5/25 regarding the 102 rejection have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. First, Applicant argues on page 5 that the prior art of Yossifan lacks the claim 1 first fluid reservoir and second fluid reservoir. In response, the examiner notes that the prior art of Yossifan teaches [0005] One type of MEMS is a microfluidic device. Microfluidic devices include components such as channels, reservoirs. [0077] These electrodes do not necessarily be positioned in the vicinity of the permselective medium 11, but can also be applied further away (e.g., via electrodes immersed within the reservoirs of the inlets/outlets of the microchannels). Therefore, the rejection is maintained. Second, Applicant argues on page 6 that the prior art of Yossifan does not teach “a fluid output from an upper part of a first fluid reservoir.” The outflow in Fig. 3B is not a reservoir, but from a microchannel, and is not from an “upper part” but from an outflow end of the branched microchannel. In response, the examiner notes the prior art of Yossifan teaches [0077] these electrodes do not necessarily be positioned in the vicinity of the permselective medium 11, but can also be applied further away (e.g., via electrodes immersed within the reservoirs of the inlets/outlets of the microchannels). Therefore, the rejection is maintained. Third, Applicant argues on page 6 that there is no reservoir in Yossifan and the membrane 11 is not even on the bottom of the microchannel, it is on the sides. In response, the examiner notes the prior art of Yossifan teaches [0005] One type of MEMS is a microfluidic device. Microfluidic devices include components such as channels, reservoirs. [0077] These electrodes do not necessarily be positioned in the vicinity of the permselective medium 11, but can also be applied further away (e.g., via electrodes immersed within the reservoirs of the inlets/outlets of the microchannels). Fourth, Applicant argues on page 7 that nowhere does the prior art of Yossifan discloses a “fluid connection to a second fluid reservoir on an opposite side of the one or more ion permselective elements.” In response, the examiner notes the examiner notes the prior art of Yossifan teaches [0005] One type of MEMS is a microfluidic device. Microfluidic devices include components such as channels, reservoirs. [0077] These electrodes do not necessarily be positioned in the vicinity of the permselective medium 11, but can also be applied further away (e.g., via electrodes immersed within the reservoirs of the inlets/outlets of the microchannels). Therefore, the rejection is maintained. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACQUELINE BRAZIN whose telephone number is (571)270-1457. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Capozzi can be reached at 571-270-3638. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JB/ /CHARLES CAPOZZI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1798
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 05, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599908
APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR MULTIPLEXED AMPLIFICATION AND DETECTION OF DNA USING CONVECTIONAL HEATING AND LABEL-FREE MICROARRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12576404
DISPOSABLE REAGENT SCAFFOLD FOR BIOCHEMICAL PROCESS INTEGRATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12566114
METHODS OF USING MODULAR ASSAY SUPPORT DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558687
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUSES TO IMAGE A SAMPLE FOR BIOLOGICAL OR CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12533295
MODULATED WEIGHT REDUCED FERRULE CANISTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+54.2%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 507 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month