Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/751,092

TERNARY OXIDE MATERIALS FOR NI-RICH CATHODE MATERIALS FOR RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 23, 2022
Examiner
KOROVINA, ANNA
Art Unit
1729
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Rivian Ip Holdings LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
29%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 4m
To Grant
54%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 29% of cases
29%
Career Allow Rate
101 granted / 345 resolved
-35.7% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 4m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
390
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 345 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 11 August 2025 has been entered. Response to Amendment Applicant amended claims 1, 4, 5, 12 and 17; claims 2-3, 6-11, 13-15 and 18-22 are cancelled. Claims 1, 4, 5, 12 and 16-17 are pending and considered in the present Office action. All of the rejections to the claims are withdrawn in view of the amendments. However, a new ground of rejection is necessitated by amendment. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1, 4-5, 12, and 16-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and/or (a)(2) as being anticipated by Maxwell et al. (US 2022/0020977), hereinafter Maxwell. Regarding Claims 1, 4-5, 12, 16, and 17, Maxwell suggests a cathode active material comprising Li(NiaMnbCoc)O2 (e.g., 102, LMO, see e.g., [0034, 0047] and Fig. 1), wherein 0 < a ≤1, 0 ≤ b ≤ 1, 0 ≤ c ≤ 1, and a+b+c=1 (e.g., LiNi0.333Mn0.333Co0.333O2, see e.g., [0047]), having a ternary lithium metal oxide coating (e.g., 106, LAO, LFO, see [0034-0035, 0046-0047, 0050-0051]) on a surface of the Li(NiaMnbCoc)O2, wherein the ternary lithium metal oxide comprises Li5AlO4 and Li5FeO4 (see e.g., [0035] and Fig. 1). Maxwell suggests the cathode active material detailed above is coated on a current collector comprising a metal (i.e., aluminum, [0135]). Moreover, the current collector coated with the cathode active material forms the cathode of a lithium ion battery which further includes an anode, separator, an electrolyte, and housing (see e.g., coin cells detailed in [0132-0135]). Claim(s) 1, 4-5, 12, and 16-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and/or (a)(2) as being anticipated by Li et al. (US 2014/0087261), hereinafter Li. Regarding Claims 1, 4-5, 12, 16, and 17, Li suggests a cathode active material comprising Li(NiaMnbCoc)O2 (e.g., 12, lithium transition metal oxide, see e.g., [0018-19]), wherein 0 < a ≤1, 0 ≤ b ≤ 1, 0 ≤ c ≤ 1, and a+b+c=1 (e.g., LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2, see e.g., [0019]), having a ternary lithium metal oxide coating (e.g., 14, [0022]) on a surface of the Li(NiaMnbCoc)O2 (see Fig. 1), wherein the ternary lithium metal oxide comprises Li2SnO3 and Li2MnO3 (see e.g., [0022]). Li suggests the cathode active material detailed above is coated on a current collector comprising a metal (i.e., aluminum, titanium, etc., [0057-58]). Moreover, the current collector coated with the cathode active material forms the cathode of a lithium ion battery which further includes an anode, separator, an electrolyte, and housing (see e.g., Fig. 7, [0057-0063], and examples). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yang et al. (Layered Li[Ni0.5Co0.2Mn0.3]O2-Li2MnO3 core shell structured cathode material with excellent stability, Journal of Power Sources 242 (2013) 589-596). Hu et al. (Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathodes Produced via Nanoscale Coating of Li+-Conductive Li2SnO3, Electrochimica Acta 213 (2016) 547–556). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANNA KOROVINA whose telephone number is (571)272-9835. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7am - 6 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ula Ruddock can be reached at 5712721481. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANNA KOROVINA/Examiner, Art Unit 1729 /ULA C RUDDOCK/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
May 07, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
May 07, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 28, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 24, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Jul 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 11, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583799
PARTITION MEMBER AND ASSEMBLED BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580181
COMPOSITE BATTERY ELECTRODE STRUCTURES COMPRISING HIGH-CAPACITY MATERIALS AND POLYMERS AND METHODS OF FORMING THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580225
SOLID-STATE BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12559430
DOPED TITANIUM NIOBATE AND BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12542271
Lithium Secondary Battery
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
29%
Grant Probability
54%
With Interview (+24.3%)
4y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 345 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month