Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/751,857

BATTERY PACK

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
May 24, 2022
Priority
May 24, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0066488
Examiner
CASERTO, JULIA SHARON
Art Unit
1789
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
20 granted / 28 resolved
+6.4% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+28.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
67
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
§112
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 28 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on April 23, 2026 has been entered. Summary Applicant’s arguments and claim amendments submitted on March 26, 2026 have been entered into the file. Claims 2-4, 9, 11, and 14 are canceled. Claims 1, 5, and 24 are amended. Claims 1, 5-8, 10, 12-13, and 15-26 are pending for examination. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: it is suggested that “bridging the two rows” be amended to “bridging the two rows of bus bars”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 5-8, 10, 12-13, and 15-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 1, claim 1 recites “the cross bus bar element bridging the two rows”. The instant disclosure does not appear to provide support for the cross bus bar element “bridging” the two rows of bus bars. It is noted that the words “bridge”, “bridged”, and “bridging” are not present in the instant disclosure. Claims 5-8, 10, 12-13, and 15-26 are dependent on claim 1 and therefore, for the reasons outlined with respect to claim 1, these claims also contain subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C 112, the inventor(s) at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 5-8, 10, 12-13, and 15-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, it is unclear what is structurally required by the cross bus bar element “bridging” the two rows of bus bars. For example, it is unclear if the cross bus bar element is required to be in physical contact with the two rows of bus bars or in the proximity of the two rows of bus bars, as show in Fig. 2. Merriam-Webster dictionary defines bridge as “a time, place, or means of connection or transition”. For the purpose of examination, the limitation “bridging” is interpretated as requiring any form of connection or transition between the two rows of bus bars, pending further clarification from applicant. Claims 5-8, 10, 12-13, and 15-26 are indefinite as they depend from an indefinite base and fail to cure the deficiencies of said claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 5-8, 10, 12-13, and 15-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ichikawa US 2016/0380318 A1 (US 10,249,917 B2 used for citations) in view of Ikeya (US 2014/0335386 A1) and Lim (EP 3641012 A1). Regarding claim 1, Ichikawa teaches a battery pack (battery assembly, abstract) comprising: a plurality of battery cells arranged in a first direction (a plurality of battery cells, abstract, Fig. 1 “X” direction), each battery cell including a terminal surface on which at least one terminal is formed (Fig. 1 Elements 41, 42); at least one bus bar disposed on the terminal surfaces and electrically connecting different ones of the battery cells (plurality of bus bars which link and connect electrodes, abstract), the at least one bus bar including a first surface facing the terminal surfaces (Fig. 1, surface of the bus bar (element 1) facing the terminal surface in the “Z” direction) and a second surface opposite to the first surface (Fig. 1, surface of the bus bar (element 1) facing element 63 in the “Z” direction), wherein the at least one bus bar comprises a first row of bus bars and a second row of bus bars, the first row of bus bars and the second row of bus bars being adjacent to each other, each of the first row of busbars and the second row of bus bars extending from one end of the plurality of battery cells to an opposite end of the plurality of battery cells (Ichikawa Fig. 1); and a resin cover (elements 61 and 63) formed on the first surface of the at least one bus bar such that the at least one bus bar is embedded in the resin cover (bus bar storing portions, Col. 5 Line 12-13; Fig. 1 Element 61). Ichikawa teaches a cover on the second surface of the at least one bus bar (cover member that covers the busbars, Col. 5 Lines 55-56; Fig. 1 Element 63); however, it is not explicitly stated what the cover member 63 is made of. It would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the same material for the cover member as was used for the busbar storing portions in order to provide electrical insulation. Ichikawa further teaches a connection wire electrically connected to the at least one bus bar and arranged on a first plane with the at least one bus bar (control board, Col. 4 lines 47-58, Fig. 1 element 2). Ichikawa further teaches the resin cover including a first cover resin layer on the first surface of the at least one bus bar on the first plane, the first surface facing the plurality of battery cells (bus bar storing portions, Col. 5 Line 12-13; Fig. 1 Element 61), and a second cover resin layer on the second surface of the at least one bus bar on the first plane, the second surface facing the opposite to the plurality of battery cells (cover member that covers the busbars, Col. 5 Lines 55-56; Fig. 1 Element 63). However, Ichikawa does not explicitly teach that the second cover resin layer (cover member 63) is made of resin. As stated above, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the same material for the cover member as was used for the busbar storing portions in order to provide electrical insulation. Ichikawa does not teach an insulating sheet between the second cover resin layer and the connection wire. However, Ikeya teaches a bus bar module to be used with a battery assembly, as in Ichikawa (Ikeya, Paragraph [0006]), and a resin member (Ikeya, element 26) “made of a resin material having an insulative property and flexibility” (Ikeya, Paragraph [0064]) with a portion (Ikeya, element 26a) that covers the connecting wire (Ikeya, circuit side member, element 24) with the purpose of providing insulation. Therefore, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have added an insulating layer between the second cover resin layer and connection wire (Ichikawa, control board, Fig. 1 element 2) of Ichikawa in order to provide insulation for the connection wire. Ichikawa further teaches the connection wire (control board, Fig. 1 element 2) arranged at a position not overlapping the at least one bus bar (bus bar, Fig. 1 element 1), the plurality of battery cells arranged in a first direction (Fig.1 “X” direction), and the connection wire (control board, Fig. 1 element 2) extending in the first direction (Fig. 1 “X” direction) from a front end (Fig. 1 leftmost battery cell in the “X” direction) to the rear end of the battery pack (Fig. 1 position to the left of where the smoking exhausting duct (Fig.1 element 3) starts). Modified Ichikawa does not expressly teach a cross bus bar element arranged at the rear end of the battery pack while simultaneously bridging the two rows and connecting two adjacent battery cells together and extending in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction. However, Lim teaches a cross bus bar element located at a rear end of a battery pack that bridges two rows of bus bars and connects adjacent battery cells together (element 178, Lim Fig. 4) in order to prevent or reduce the risk of a short circuit due to high voltage (Lim [0105]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to add a cross bus bar element, as taught by Lim, to the battery pack of modified Ichikawa, thus resulting in the cross bus bar element extending in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction and the connection wire not overlapping the cross bus bar element, in order to prevent or reduce the risk short circuits. Regarding claim 5, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claim 1, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the connection wire (control board, Fig. 1 element 2) between the first row of bus bars and the second row of bus bars (Ichikawa Fig. 1). PNG media_image1.png 819 608 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 6, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claims 1 and 5, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the first and second bus bar elements (Fig. 1 element 1) of the first and the second rows (shown above in Fig. 1 annotated-A, first row and second row) respectively arranged to correspond to a first terminal position and a second terminal position (Fig. 1 elements 41 ,42). As shown in Fig. 1, when the battery pack of Ichikawa is assembled, the bus bar elements are located on top of terminal positions (Fig.1 41, 42). Regarding claim 7, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claims 1 and 5-6, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the plurality of battery cells (Fig. 1 element 4) arranged in a first direction (Fig. 1 “X” direction), and the first and second bus bar elements of the first row are spaces apart from the first and second bus bar elements of the second row in a second direction (Fig. 1 “Y” direction), the second direction crossing the first direction (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 8, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claims 1 and 5-6, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches each battery cell including a vent portion (Fig. 1 element 43), which is arranged between the first and second terminal positions (Fig. 1 elements 41, 42) in the second direction (Fig. 1 “Y” direction). Ichikawa also teaches the connection wire (Fig. 1 element 2) arranged corresponding to the vent portions (Fig. 1 element 43), according to the interpretation described above for the limitation “arranged corresponding to the vent portions”. Regarding claim 10, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claim 1, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the plurality of battery cells arranged in a first direction (Fig. 1 “X” direction), the connection wire (control board, Fig. 1 element 2) arranged at a central position on the place in the second direction (Fig. 1 “Y” direction), the second direction (Fig. 1 “Y” direction) crossing the first direction (Fig. 1 “X” direction), and the at least one bus bar (Fig. 1 element 1) arranged at an edge position on the plan in the second direction (Fig. 1 “Y” direction). Regarding claim 12, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claim 1, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches a third opening formed in the second cover resin layer (Fig. 1 annotated-E). Ichikawa does not teach the insulating sheet between the third opening and the connection wire, and a width of the insulating sheet being greater than a width of the connection wire and greater than a width of the third opening. However, Ikeya teaches a bus bar module to be used with a battery assembly, as in Ichikawa (Ikeya, Paragraph [0006]), and a resin member (Ikeya, element 26) “made of a resin material having an insulative property and flexibility” (Ikeya, Paragraph [0064]) with a portion (Ikeya, element 26a) that covers the connecting wire (Ikeya, circuit side member, element 24) with the purpose of providing insulation. Therefore, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have added an insulating layer, with a width greater than the width of the third opening and width of the connection wire, between the second cover resin layer and connection wire (Ichikawa, control board, Fig. 1 element 2) of Ichikawa in order to provide insulation for the connection wire. It would have been obvious to provide the insulative layer such that it has a width greater than the electrical component it is trying to insulate and wider than any openings in the top of the battery pack/module structure in order to provide full insulative coverage in the pack. Regarding claim 13, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claim 1, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the first cover resin layer (Fig. 1 element 61) including a pair of first openings (Fig. 1 annotated-B), which are respectively formed at a first terminal position (Fig. 1 elements 41,42) and a second terminal position (Fig. 1 elements 41, 42) of each of the plurality of battery cells (Fig. 1 element 4). PNG media_image2.png 364 757 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 15, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claims 1 and 13, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the pair of first openings respectively formed at edge positions in the second direction (Fig. 1 “Y” direction) and corresponding to the first and second terminal positions (Fig. 1 elements 41, 42). Regarding claim 16, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claims 1, 13, and 15, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the pair of first openings intermittently formed in the first direction (Fig. 1 “X” direction) and corresponding to the first and second terminal positions (Fig. 1 elements 41, 42). Regarding claim 17, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claims 1 and 13, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the first cover resin layer further including a second opening (Fig. 1 annotated-C) formed at a central position between the pair of first openings that are formed at respective edge positions in the second direction (Fig. 1 “Y” direction). PNG media_image3.png 303 852 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 18, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claims 1, 13, and 17, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the plurality of battery cells arranged in the first direction (Fig. 1 “X” direction), and the first cover resin layer comprising first, second, third, and fourth application lines (Fig. 1 annotated-D), which are continuously formed in the first direction (Fig. 1 “X” direction) with the pair of first openings and the second opening therebetween (Fig. 1 annotated-D). Claim 18 is a product-by-process claim (first cover resin layer formed by curing). Although Ichikawa does not teach the first cover resin layer formed by curing, it is noted that “Even though product-by-process claims are limited by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product itself. The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the product-by-process claim is the same as or obvious from a product of the prior art, the claim is unpatentable even though the prior art product was made by a different process”. Further, “the burden shifts to applicant to come forward with evidence establishing an unobvious difference between the claimed product and the prior art product”, See MPEP 2113. The structure resulting from the first resin layer being formed by curing first through fourth application lines, as claimed, is a cover made from a resin. Ichikawa (Fig.1) teaches a resin cover which reads on the structural limitations of the claim. Furthermore, there does not appear to be a difference between the prior art structure and the structure resulting from the claimed method because Ichikawa discloses a resin cover (Fig. 1 element 61) that comprises four application lines (Fig. 1 annotated-D). PNG media_image4.png 915 990 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 19, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claims 1, 13, and 17, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the second opening (Fig. 1 annotated-D) formed at a position corresponding to vent portions (Fig. 1 annotated-D, element 43) of the plurality of battery cells (Fig. 1 annotated-D, element 4). Regarding claim 20, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claims 1, 13, and 17, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the second cover resin layer (Fig. 1 annotated-E, element 63) including a third opening (Fig. 1 annotated-E) formed at a position corresponding to the second opening (Fig. 1 annotated-E). PNG media_image5.png 496 713 media_image5.png Greyscale Regarding claim 21, Ichikawa in view Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claims 1, 13, 17, and 20, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the plurality of battery cells arranged in the first direction (Fig. 1 “X’ direction), and the second and third openings continuously formed in the first direction (Fig. 1 annotated-E). Regarding claim 22, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claims 1, 13, 17, and 20, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the plurality of battery cells arranged in the first direction (Fig. 1 “X” direction), and the second cover resin layer (Fig. 1 element 63) comprising fifth and sixth application lines (Fig. 1 annotated-F) that are continuously formed in the first direction (Fig. 1 “X” direction) with the third opening therebetween (Fig. 1 annotated-F). PNG media_image6.png 234 733 media_image6.png Greyscale Regarding claim 23, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claims 1, 13, 17, 20, and 22, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the fifth application line (Fig. 1 annotated-F) formed on a first application line and a second application line (Fig. 1 annotated-D), which are formed with one of the pair of first openings therebetween, and the sixth application line (Fig. 1 annotated-F) formed on a third application line and a fourth application line (Fig. 1 annotated-D), which are formed with another of the pair of first openings therebetween. Regarding claim 24, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claim 1, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the at least one bus bar (Fig. 1 element 1) embedded in the resin cover between a first surface of the first cover resin layer (Fig. 1 element 61) and a second surface of the second cover resin layer (Fig. 1 element 63), and the first row of bus bars and the second row of bus bars are coupled to a first terminal and a second terminal (Fig. 1 elements 41, 42), which are disposed on the terminal surfaces (Fig. 1 annotated-G) of the plurality of battery cells (Fig. 1 element 4), through a coupling portion (Fig. 1 annotated-G) that is exposed through a first opening of the first cover resin layer (Fig. 1 element 61). PNG media_image7.png 436 865 media_image7.png Greyscale Regarding claim 25, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claim 1, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the first (Fig. 1 element 61) and second (Fig. 1 element 63) cover resin layers continuously connected to each other through at least one space between the plurality of bus bar elements (Fig. 1 annotated-H). PNG media_image8.png 587 643 media_image8.png Greyscale Regarding claim 26, Ichikawa in view of Ikeya and Lim teaches all features of claim 1, as described above. Ichikawa further teaches the plurality of bus bar elements including a first bus bar element and a second bus bar element (Fig. 1 annotated-A), which are arranged in different orientations in a second direction (Fig. 1 “Y” direction) and are adjacent to each other in the first direction (Fig. 1 “X” direction), and the first and second cover resin layers continuously connected to each other through at least one space between the first and second bus bar elements (Fig. 1 annotated-H). Response to Arguments Response – 112b Rejections The rejections of claims 1, 5-8, 10, 12-13, and 15-26 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention presented in the Final Rejection dated January 27, 2026 are overcome by applicant’s amendments to claims 1 and 5 in the response received March 26, 2026. These rejections are withdrawn. It is noted that applicant’s amendments to claim 1 necessitate new 112(b) rejections, as described above. Response – Claim Rejections 35 USC § 103 Applicant's arguments filed March 26, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. On page 12 of the response, applicant appears to allege that the annotated Fig. 1 presented in the previous office action "appears to show a groove not a cross bus bar element" and does not teach a cross bus bar element that is at a rear end of the battery pack. The annotated Fig. 1 shown on page 6 of the office action depicts an arrow demonstrating the direction of the width of a bus bar and does not "show a groove" as alleged by applicant. On page 13 of the response, applicant appears to allege that Ichikawa does not teach the cross bus bar element bridging the rows. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Ichikawa-2020 (US 2020/0020918 A1): appears to disclose a bus bar module for use in a battery assembly comprising a plurality of cells, wherein the bus bar module comprises bus bars that connect battery cell electrodes, a holder to hold the bus bars, and a cover for protection (claim 1, Figs. 3, 18A). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JULIA S CASERTO whose telephone number is (571)272-5114. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30 am - 5 pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marla McConnell can be reached on 571-270-7692. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.S.C./Examiner, Art Unit 1789 /LARISSA ROWE EMRICH/Examiner, Art Unit 1789
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
Aug 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Mar 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12731813
SOLID-STATE ELECTROLYTE MATERIAL COMPRISING A CHALCOGENIDE-BASED IONIC-CONDUCTIVE STRUCTURE, PARTICULARLY A SULFIDE-BASED IONIC-CONDUCTIVE STRUCTURE
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725801
NEGATIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL, NEGATIVE ELECTRODE USING THE NEGATIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING NEGATIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12706343
BATTERY PACK INCLUDING HORIZONTAL CELL STACK STRUCTURE
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700616
POUCH TYPE ALL-SOLID-STATE LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12689061
SYNERGISTIC ADDITIVES FOR HIGH VOLUME LITHIUM ION BATTERIES
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+28.9%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 28 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month