Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/755,001

DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 19, 2022
Examiner
HSIEH, HSIN YI
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Huizhou China Star Optoelectronics Display Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
57%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allow Rate
321 granted / 631 resolved
-17.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
57 currently pending
Career history
688
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
39.3%
-0.7% vs TC avg
§102
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§112
35.3%
-4.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 631 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 03/09/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 and 5-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the two of the cathode contact holes" in the 11th line of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation “the cathode contact holes” in the last two lines of the claim. It is unclear whether it refers to “a corresponding one of cathode contact holes” in the third line of the claim, or “one of the cathode contact holes” in the 8th and 9th lines, or "the two of the cathode contact holes" in the 11th line of the claim. Claims 5-8 are rejected because they depend on the rejected claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 5-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Liu et al. (US 2022/0020827 A1). Regarding claim 1, Liu et al. teach a display panel (display substrate; Fig. 14a; [0275]), comprising a cathode (51; Fig. 14c, [0275]) and an auxiliary electrode (6; Fig. 14c, [0275]) arranged in a layer (81; Fig. 14c, [0277]) different from the cathode (51), wherein the auxiliary electrode (6) is electrically connected to the cathode (51) through a corresponding one of cathode contact holes (one of the Via3; Figs. 14a-c, [0277]), the display panel (display substrate; Fig. 14a) further comprises a plurality of sub-pixels (R, G, B sub-pixels, i.e. red, green, blue sub-pixels; Fig. 14b, [0024, 0342]) arranged in an array (see Fig. 14b), an extension length of each of the sub-pixels (R, G, B, sub-pixels) along a first direction (the vertical direction of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown below) is less than an extension length of each of the sub-pixels (R, G, B, sub-pixels) along a second direction (the horizontal direction of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown below), and the second direction (the horizontal direction of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown below) intersects the first direction (the vertical direction of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown below); and wherein the sub-pixels (R, G, B sub-pixels) are arranged in a plurality of row sets (row sets each having three immediately adjacent rows of the sub-pixels), each of the row sets (each of the row sets having three immediately adjacent rows of the sub-pixels) comprises at least three adjacent rows of the sub-pixels (three immediately adjacent rows of the sub-pixels), one of the cathode contact holes (the Via3 at the center of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown below) is defined between adjacent two of the row sets of the sub-pixels (between two row sets having three immediately adjacent rows of the sub-pixels with the top row being the B sub-pixel row of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise) and extends along the second direction (the horizontal direction of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown below), outermost two of the sub-pixels of each of the row sets (the left B subpixel and the left G sub-pixels of each of the two row sets with the top row being the B sub-pixel row) are located adjacent to the two of the cathode contact holes (two of Via3 at the bottom edge and top edge of each of the row sets with the top row being the B sub-pixel row of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown below) respectively, and intervening one or more of the sub-pixels of each of the row sets (the left R subpixel of each of the two row sets with the top row being the B sub-pixel row) between and adjacent to the outermost two (the left B subpixel and the left G sub-pixels of each of the row sets) are located away from the cathode contact holes (at least the two of Via3 at the bottom edge and top edge of each of the row sets with the top row being the B sub-pixel row of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown below). PNG media_image1.png 329 439 media_image1.png Greyscale [AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] Fig. 14b of Liu et al. turning 90° counter-clockwise Regarding claim 5, Liu et al. teach the display panel (display substrate; Fig. 14a) according to claim 1, wherein each of the sub-pixels (R, G, B, sub-pixels) corresponds to one of the cathode contact holes (Via3; see Fig. 14b above). Regarding claim 6, Liu et al. teach the display panel (display substrate; Fig. 14a) according to claim 1, wherein the sub-pixels (R, G, B, sub-pixels) are red sub-pixels (R sub-pixels), green sub-pixels (G sub-pixels), or blue sub-pixels (B sub-pixels); the red sub-pixels (R sub-pixels), the green sub-pixels (G sub-pixels), and the blue sub-pixels (B sub-pixels) are repeatedly arranged in any combination as repeating units (units of a set of G/R/B sub-pixels); and each of the repeating units (units of a set of G/R/B sub-pixels) is correspondingly provided with one of the cathode contact holes (Via3; see Fig. 14b). Regarding claim 7, Liu et al. teach the display panel (display substrate; Fig. 14a) according to claim 6, wherein an extension length of each of the red sub-pixels (R sub-pixels) in the second direction (the horizontal direction of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown above), an extension length of each of the green sub-pixels (G sub-pixels) in the second direction (the horizontal direction of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown above), and an extension length of each of the blue sub-pixels (B sub-pixels) in the second direction (the horizontal direction of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown above) are all equal, and an extension length of each of the red sub-pixels (R sub-pixels) along the first direction (the vertical direction of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown above) is greater than an extension length of each of the green sub-pixels (G sub-pixels) along the first direction (the vertical direction of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown above), an extension length of each of the blue sub-pixels (B sub-pixels) along the first direction (the vertical direction of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown above) is greater than the extension length of each of the red sub-pixels (R sub-pixels) along the first direction (the vertical direction of Fig. 14b turning 90° counter-clockwise as shown above). Regarding claim 8, Liu et al. teach the display panel (display substrate; Fig. 14a) according to claim 7, wherein the cathode contact holes (Via3) are disposed between the red sub-pixels (R sub-pixels) and the green sub-pixels (G sub-pixels). Response to Arguments Applicant’s amendments, filed 03/09/2026, overcome the rejections to claims 1 and 5-8 under 35 U.S.C. 112. The rejections to claims 1 and 5-8 under 35 U.S.C. 112 have been withdrawn. Applicant's arguments with respect to claim 1 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Liu et al. (US 12396348 B2) teach a display substrate having cathode contact holes. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HSIN YI HSIEH whose telephone number is (571)270-3043. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Zandra V Smith can be reached on 571-272-2429. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HSIN YI HSIEH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2899 3/12/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2022
Application Filed
May 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Aug 27, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 06, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §112
Mar 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598786
FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12575243
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12550486
OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE WITH AXIAL THREE-DIMENSIONAL LIGHT-EMITTING DIODES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12538616
LIGHT EMITTING DIODE WITH OPTIMISED ELECTRIC INJECTION FROM A SIDE ELECTRODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12538617
3D LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE AND ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
57%
With Interview (+6.2%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 631 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month