Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/755,652

TERMINAL AND RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 04, 2022
Priority
Nov 05, 2019 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2019043313
Examiner
YOUNG, STEVE R
Art Unit
2477
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
NTT Docomo Inc.
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
388 granted / 580 resolved
+8.9% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
610
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
92.6%
+52.6% vs TC avg
§102
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§112
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 580 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 7-9, 11-12, 16 are pending. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 03/04/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 7-9, 11-12, 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu (US# 2021/0135830) in view of Jang et al. (US# 2022/0345195 hereinafter referred to as Jang) and Liu et al. (US# 2022/0345903 hereinafter referred to as Liu). RE Claim 7, Yu discloses a terminal comprising: a receiver that receives configuration information for a plurality of sounding reference signal (SRS) resource sets (See Yu FIGs 2-3; Summary; [0007]-[0009], [0206]-[0207], [0211] – receiving configuration information for SRS resource sets); and a processor that, when spatial relation information included in the configuration information is not configured for a first SRS resource and a second SRS resource included in a first SRS resource set within the plurality of SRS resource sets (See Yu FIG 2; [0087] – first and second SRS resource in a first SRS resource set (i.e. 210)), and is not configured for a third SRS resource and a fourth SRS resource included in a second SRS resource set within the plurality of SRS resource sets (See Yu FIG 2; [0087] – third and fourth SRS resource in a second SRS resource set (i.e. 220)), uses a same spatial relation for the first SRS resource, second SRS resource, third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource (See Yu FIGs 2-3; Summary; [0007]-[0009], [0206]-[0207], [0211] – if no spatial relation information is included in configuration information, using a default spatial relation for plurality of resources). Yu does not specifically disclose Receiving configuration information for antenna switching; or Wherein the first SRS resource, the second SRS resource, the third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource are located in different slots, respectively. However, Jang teaches of receiving configuration information for antenna switching (See Jang [0097], [0278], [0315]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the SRS resource set configuration system, as disclosed in Yu, comprising receiving configuration information for antenna switching, as taught in Jang. One is motivated as such in order to improve transmission performance (See Jang [0002]-[0007]). Yu, modified by Jang, does not specifically disclose Wherein the first SRS resource, the second SRS resource, the third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource are located in different slots, respectively. However, Liu teaches of Wherein the first SRS resource, the second SRS resource, the third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource are located in different slots, respectively (See Liu [0003]-[0004], [0009], [0054], [0056], [0070] – for multiple SRS resources on multiple respective slots, if SRS spatial relation configuration is not configured, using same default spatial relation for each respective SRS resource). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the SRS resource set configuration system, as disclosed in Yu, modified by Jang, Wherein the first SRS resource, the second SRS resource, the third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource are located in different slots, respectively, as taught in Liu. One is motivated as such in order to better determine spatial relation information for uplink transmissions (See Liu Background; Summary). RE Claim 8, Yu, modified by Jang and Liu, discloses a terminal, as set forth in claim 7 above, wherein when the spatial relation information is not configured for at least one SRS resource within at least one SRS resource set among the plurality of SRS resource sets, and at least one control resource set (CORESET) is configured on a component carrier (CC) of the at least one SRS resource, the processor uses, as a spatial relation for the at least one SRS resource, a spatial relation for a reference signal (RS) of quasi-co-location (QCL) type D in QCL assumption of a CORESET with a lowest CORESET ID (See Yu [0061], [0068] – if CORESET is configured on CC, using lowest CORESET ID). RE Claim 9, Yu, modified by Jang and Liu, discloses a terminal, as set forth in claim 7 above, wherein when the spatial relation information is not configured for at least one SRS resource within at least one SRS resource set among the plurality of SRS resource sets, and a control resource set (CORESET) is not configured on a component carrier (CC) of the at least one SRS resource, the processor uses, as a spatial relation for the at least one SRS resource, a spatial relation for a reference signal (RS) of quasi-co-location (QCL) type D in an activated transmission configuration indication (TCI) state with a lowest ID which is applicable to a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) in an active downlink bandwidth (DL BWP) of the CC (See Yu [0062], [0069] – if CORESET is not configured on CC, using TCI state with lowest ID applicable to PDSCH in active DL BWP). RE Claim 11, Yu discloses a radio communication method for a terminal, comprising: receiving configuration information for a plurality of sounding reference signal (SRS) resource sets (See Yu FIGs 2-3; Summary; [0007]-[0009], [0206]-[0207] – receiving configuration information for SRS resource sets); and when spatial relation information included in the configuration information is not configured for a first SRS resource and a second SRS resource included in a first SRS resource set within the plurality of SRS resource sets (See Yu FIG 2; [0087] – first and second SRS resource in a first SRS resource set (i.e. 210)), and is not configured for a third SRS resource and a fourth SRS resource included in a second SRS resource set within the plurality of SRS resource sets (See Yu FIG 2; [0087] – third and fourth SRS resource in a second SRS resource set (i.e. 220)), uses a same spatial relation for the first SRS resource, second SRS resource, third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource (See Yu FIGs 2-3; Summary; [0007]-[0009], [0206]-[0207], [0211] – if no spatial relation information is included in configuration information, using a default spatial relation for plurality of resources). Yu does not specifically disclose Receiving configuration information for antenna switching; or Wherein the first SRS resource, the second SRS resource, the third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource are located in different slots, respectively. However, Jang teaches of receiving configuration information for antenna switching (See Jang [0097], [0278], [0315]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the SRS resource set configuration system, as disclosed in Yu, comprising receiving configuration information for antenna switching, as taught in Jang. One is motivated as such in order to improve transmission performance (See Jang [0002]-[0007]). Yu, modified by Jang, does not specifically disclose Wherein the first SRS resource, the second SRS resource, the third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource are located in different slots, respectively. However, Liu teaches of Wherein the first SRS resource, the second SRS resource, the third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource are located in different slots, respectively (See Liu [0003]-[0004], [0009], [0054], [0056], [0070] – for multiple SRS resources on multiple respective slots, if SRS spatial relation configuration is not configured, using same default spatial relation for each respective SRS resource). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the SRS resource set configuration system, as disclosed in Yu, modified by Jang, Wherein the first SRS resource, the second SRS resource, the third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource are located in different slots, respectively, as taught in Liu. One is motivated as such in order to better determine spatial relation information for uplink transmissions (See Liu Background; Summary). RE Claim 12, Yu discloses a system comprising a terminal and a base station (See Yu Background; Summary), wherein the terminal comprises: a receiver that receives configuration information for a plurality of sounding reference signal (SRS) resource sets (See Yu FIGs 2-3; Summary; [0007]-[0009], [0206]-[0207], [0211] – receiving configuration information for SRS resource sets); and a processor that, when spatial relation information included in the configuration information is not configured for a first SRS resource and a second SRS resource included in a first SRS resource set within the plurality of SRS resource sets (See Yu FIG 2; [0087] – first and second SRS resource in a first SRS resource set (i.e. 210)), and is not configured for a third SRS resource and a fourth SRS resource included in a second SRS resource set within the plurality of SRS resource sets (See Yu FIG 2; [0087] – third and fourth SRS resource in a second SRS resource set (i.e. 220)), uses a same spatial relation for the first SRS resource, second SRS resource, third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource (See Yu FIGs 2-3; Summary; [0007]-[0009], [0206]-[0207], [0211] – if no spatial relation information is included in configuration information, using a default spatial relation for plurality of resources); and the base station comprises: a transmitter that transmits the configuration information (See Yu FIGs 2-3; Summary; [0007]-[0009] – UE receiving configuration information from cell base station). Yu does not specifically disclose Receiving configuration information for antenna switching; or Wherein the first SRS resource, the second SRS resource, the third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource are located in different slots, respectively. However, Jang teaches of receiving configuration information for antenna switching (See Jang [0097], [0278], [0315]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the SRS resource set configuration system, as disclosed in Yu, comprising receiving configuration information for antenna switching, as taught in Jang. One is motivated as such in order to improve transmission performance (See Jang [0002]-[0007]). Yu, modified by Jang, does not specifically disclose Wherein the first SRS resource, the second SRS resource, the third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource are located in different slots, respectively. However, Liu teaches of Wherein the first SRS resource, the second SRS resource, the third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource are located in different slots, respectively (See Liu [0003]-[0004], [0009], [0054], [0056], [0070] – for multiple SRS resources on multiple respective slots, if SRS spatial relation configuration is not configured, using same default spatial relation for each respective SRS resource). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to implement the SRS resource set configuration system, as disclosed in Yu, modified by Jang, Wherein the first SRS resource, the second SRS resource, the third SRS resource and the fourth SRS resource are located in different slots, respectively, as taught in Liu. One is motivated as such in order to better determine spatial relation information for uplink transmissions (See Liu Background; Summary). RE Claim 16, Yu, modified by Jang and Liu, discloses a terminal, as set forth in claim 7 above, wherein the processor uses the same spatial relation for the first SRS resource, the second SRS resource, the third SRS resource, and the fourth SRS resource in a case where the spatial relation information included in the configuration information is not configured in a Frequency Range 2 (FR2) (See Liu [0003]-[0004] – default spatial relation for SRS resources when spatial relation information is not configured in FR2). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 03/04/2026 have been fully considered but they are moot in view of new grounds of rejection, necessitated by amendment (See Claims above, Liu reference). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Steve R Young whose telephone number is (571)270-7518. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag G Shah can be reached at (571) 272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVE R YOUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 13 earlier events
Aug 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 20, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 11, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12634943
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING UPLINK CONTROL INFORMATION ON BASIS OF NEURAL NETWORK
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628220
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COOPERATIVE COMMUNICATION USING MULTI-LINK IN COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
4y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12598601
RADIO FREQUENCY SHARED PATH INFORMATION
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581395
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING SIGNALS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION, AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
3y 4m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580697
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 10m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+20.1%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 580 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month