Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 17/755,846

Silane-Based Coating Compositions Comprising a Metal Alkoxide Catalyst

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 10, 2022
Examiner
MOORE, MARGARET G
Art Unit
1765
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
BASF Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
885 granted / 1302 resolved
+3.0% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1346
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
57.4%
+17.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§112
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1302 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment Applicants’ reply has overcome the previous rejection dated 12/4/25. In view of this the Examiner has updated the prior art search and has found a new grounds of rejection. Because applicants’ amendment did not necessitate this new ground of rejection, this is a new non-final office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3 to 15, 21 and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ziche et al. in view of Wakabayashi et al. Ziche et al. teach a crosslinkable organosilicon composition. For claimed component a) see the polymer (A) found in line 52 of column 2. The terminal group of formula (I) corresponds to the claimed general formula (I). Specifically the formulas found on column 3, line 53 to column 4, line 5, exemplify groups of formula (I). Lines 59-66 show various silanes meeting claimed (I) in which the N atom is attach-ed to a methyl group and an alkylene group, as well as attachment to the polymer itself. For claimed component c) see the catalyst found in column 5, lines 50 to 61. This teaches multiple metal alkoxides. Column 9, line 25, teaches alkyl aromatics as useful solvents. These are aprotic organic solvents and meet claimed d). Ziche et al. teach each of claimed a), c) and d). This differs from that claimed in that it does not teach claimed b). . Note, though, that the teachings in Ziche et al. are inclusive of all known and useful condensation catalysts (column 5, lines 48 and 49). Wakabayashi et al. teach, as a condensation catalyst (c2), metal carboxylates having a quaternary carbon adjacent to the carbonyl group. See paragraph 109. This improves curability and adhesiveness. See paragraphs 104 and 105. Examples of the metal carboxylates are found in paragraph 115 to 118 and include potassium versatate (or potassium neodecanoic, as found in claims 4 and 20). Wakabayashi et al. also teach that these catalyst can be used in combination with other metal carboxylate catalysts. See paragraph 130. This combination increases catalytic activity, curability and other properties. From this one having ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to add the metal carboxylate (c2) in Wakabayashi et al. to the composition of Ziche et al. such that there is a combination of the claimed catalysts b) and c) therein, in an effort to take advantage of the properties and benefits thereof as taught by Wakabayashi et al., noted supra. In this manner claims 1, 4 and 20 are rendered obvious For claim 3, again see the end groups shown in column 3, lines 59 to 66, which show formulas meeting this claim. For claim 4, see column 5, lines 43 to 46. The preferred range of 20 to 40 wt% falls within the claimed range. For claim 5, note that such a potassium catalyst is specifically disclosed in para-graph 118. For claims 6 and 9, note that adjusting the amount of catalyst in the combined composition noted supra would have been well within the skill of the ordinary artisan, in an effort to optimize properties while not using an excess of catalyst. This is particularly true in view of the fact that Wakabayashi et al. teach adding two different catalysts. For claims 7 and 8, note that paragraph 130 in Wakabayashi et al. teach each of these catalysts. They are also taught in Ziche et al. in column 5, lines 51 to 53. For claim 10, note that no pigment or colorant is required such that the obvious composition noted above would be expected to be a clearcoat. Note that the claimed compositions are the same (with the exception of one catalyst) as that in Ziche et al. such that the appearance of the compositions would be expected to be the same. For claim 11 note that of the required components in Ziche et al., none is a cross-linking agent or a tin containing compound such that these limitations are met. On the other hand, see column 5, line 66 to column 6, line 4, which teaches tin in this amount. For claims 12 to 15, see column 10, line 16, which teaches using the composition as a coating. Note that multilayered coatings are extremely common and well known, in an effort to ensure optimal coverage and thickness and smoothness of the resulting layers. Column 9, line 50, through column 10, line 10, teaches the coating method as claimed. For claim 21 again see paragraph 130 in Wakabayashi et al. and column 5, lines 51 to 53 of Ziche et al. Both sections teach catalysts having 4 alkoxy groups. For claim 22, note that such polysiloxanes are not required in the composition of Ziche et al. Furthermore they are not embraced by the preferred composition as found in column 9, lines 34 to 44. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARGARET MOORE whose telephone number is (571)272-1090. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday to Friday, 10 am to 5 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Heidi Kelly, can be reached at 571-270-1831. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /MARGARET G MOORE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1765
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 10, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 18, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 02, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601178
BONDING ADHESIVE AND ADHERED ROOFING SYSTEMS PREPARED USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595339
PREPARATION OF ORGANOSILICON COMPOUNDS WITH ALDEHYDE FUNCTIONALITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590185
RAPID-CURING TWO-COMPONENT SILICONE COMPOSITION HAVING A LONGER MIXER OPEN TIME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583975
UV-CURABLE ORGANOPOLYSILOXANE COMPOSITION AND USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577351
Increasing the molecular weight of low molecular weight alpha,omega-polysiloxanediols
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+15.1%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1302 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month