Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/757,406

ELECTRICAL STORAGE MODULE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 15, 2022
Priority
Dec 27, 2019 — JP 2019-238376 +3 more
Examiner
RHEE, JANE J
Art Unit
1724
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
969 granted / 1127 resolved
+21.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1150
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
79.0%
+39.0% vs TC avg
§102
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1127 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Rejections Withdrawn 1. The 35 U.S.C. 102(a) rejection of claims 1-5,7 anticipated by Kimura et al. has been withdrawn due to applicant’s amendment filed on 5/26/26. 2. The 35 U.S.C. 103(a) rejection of claim 6 unpatentable over Kimura et al. in view of Enomoto et al. has been withdrawn due to applicant’s amendment filed on 5/26/26. 3. The 35 U.S.C. 103(a) rejection of claim 9-17,20 unpatentable over Kimura et al. in view of Takano et al. has been withdrawn due to applicant’s amendment filed on 5/26/26. 4. The 35 U.S.C. 103(a) rejection of claim 18-19 unpatentable over Kimura et al. in view of Motokawa et al. has been repeated withdrawn due to applicant’s amendment filed on 5/26/26. New Rejections Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 5. Claim(s) 1,3-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by Geshi et al. (WO2019194053). As to claim 1, Geshi et al. discloses a power storage module (figure 4b) comprising: a plurality of power storage devices (10a); and a first current collector (600) that holds the plurality of power storage devices, the first current collector entirely composed of an electrical conductor wherein, the plurality of power storage devices (figure 2a) each include: a case including an opening (100a): an electrode assembly (200a) including a first electrode and a second electrode housed in the case; and a sealing member (300a) that seals the opening, the case includes: a tubular part including one end provided with the opening; a flange part (110a) extending radially outward from the one end of the tubular part and a bottom that closes another end of the tubular part, the first current collector (600) includes a plate with a plurality of first through-holes in each of which a corresponding one of the plurality of power storage devices is set, and the plate of the first current collector is at least partially in direct contact with and is electrically connected to the flange part (figure 1c number 400). As to claim 3, wherein the periphery of each of the first through-holes and the flange part are at least partially joined by welding is a product by process limitation. Even though product-by-process claims are limited by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product itself. The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the product in the product-by- process claim is the same as or obvious from a product of the prior art, the claim is unpatentable even though the prior product was made by a different process. In re Thorpe, 227 USPQ 964, 966 (Fed. Cir. 1985). As to claim 4, Geshi et al. discloses wherein the first current collector includes a plurality of walls, each of which extends from periphery of a corresponding one of the first through-holes toward the bottom of the case of the corresponding one of the power storage devices and is at least partially in direct contact with the tubular part of the case of the corresponding one of the power storage devices (figure 4b number 600). As to claim 5, Geshi et al. discloses further comprising a second current collector electrically connected to the second electrode of the electrode assembly, wherein the flange part is disposed between the first current collector and the second current collector (figure 4b number 700). As to claim 6, Geshi et al. discloses further comprising an insulating member interposed between the first current collector and the second current collector, wherein the insulating member includes a first surface in contact with the second current collector, and a second surface located opposite to the first surface, the second surface being in contact with the flange part or the sealing member (figure 4b number 800). As to claim 7, Geshi et al. wherein the sealing member includes: a sealing plate a cap in an annular shape surrounding the sealing plate; and a gasket that insulates the sealing plate from the cap, and the cap is electrically connected to the flange part, and the sealing plate is electrically connected to the second electrode of the electrode assembly (figure 2a number 310,300,320a). As to claim 8, Geshi et al. discloses, wherein the second current collector includes a region facing the sealing plate, the region including a second through-hole and a tongue-shaped lead extending from a periphery of the second through-hole toward an inside of the second through-hole, and the tongue- shaped lead is electrically connected to the sealing plate (figure 4a number 700,701). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 6. Claim(s) 9-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Geshi et al. in view of Takano et al. (US20260020893). Geshi et al. teaches the power storage module described above. Geshi et al. fail to disclose wherein the case further includes an enlarged diameter part that is continuous with the one end of the tubular part and includes an opening end corresponding to the opening, and a groove in an annular shape that is provided between the tubular part and the enlarged diameter part and is recessed inward in a radial direction of the tubular part, the enlarged diameter part includes a maximum outer diameter DI larger than an outer diameter D2 of the tubular part, the enlarged diameter part compresses the sealing member, the first current collector is electrically connected to at least one of the enlarged diameter part and the groove, and the periphery surrounding each of the first through-holes of the first current collector overlaps a surface close to the enlarged diameter part in inner surfaces of the groove. Takano et al. teaches fail to disclose wherein the case further includes an enlarged diameter part that is continuous with the one end of the tubular part and includes an opening end corresponding to the opening, and a groove in an annular shape that is provided between the tubular part and the enlarged diameter part and is recessed inward in a radial direction of the tubular part, the enlarged diameter part includes a maximum outer diameter DI larger than an outer diameter D2 of the tubular part, the enlarged diameter part compresses the sealing member, the first current collector is electrically connected to at least one of the enlarged diameter part and the groove, and the periphery surrounding each of the first through-holes of the first current collector overlaps a surface close to the enlarged diameter part in inner surfaces of the groove (figure 1 number 150) for the purpose of anchoring the metal case to a holder (paragraph 0026). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant's invention was made to provide Geshi et al. with wherein the case further includes an enlarged diameter part that is continuous with the one end of the tubular part and includes an opening end corresponding to the opening, and a groove in an annular shape that is provided between the tubular part and the enlarged diameter part and is recessed inward in a radial direction of the tubular part, the enlarged diameter part includes a maximum outer diameter DI larger than an outer diameter D2 of the tubular part, the enlarged diameter part compresses the sealing member, the first current collector is electrically connected to at least one of the enlarged diameter part and the groove, and the periphery surrounding each of the first through-holes of the first current collector overlaps a surface close to the enlarged diameter part in inner surfaces of the groove (figure 1 number 150) for the purpose of anchoring the metal case to a holder (paragraph 0026). As to claim 10, Geshi et al. discloses wherein each of the retainers receives an inner surface of the groove of the case of he corresponding one of the power storage (figure 3b). As to claim 11, Geshi et al. fail to disclose wherein the enlarged diameter part is bent. Kimura et al. discloses including a first part disposed on an outer surface of a periphery of the sealing member and a second part disposed on a side surface of the periphery of the sealing member, and the first part and the groove compress the periphery of the sealing member in a direction in which an outer surface and an inner surface of the sealing member face each other (figure 4b number 600). Takano et al. teaches wherein the enlarged diameter part is bent, (figure 1 number 150) for the purpose of anchoring the metal case to a holder (paragraph 0026). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant's invention was made to provide Geshi et al. with wherein the enlarged diameter part is bent, including a first part disposed on an outer surface of a periphery of the sealing member and a second part disposed on a side surface of the periphery, and the first part and the groove compress the periphery of the sealing member in a direction in which an outer surface and an inner surface of the sealing member face each other (figure 1 number 150) for the purpose of anchoring the metal case to a holder (paragraph 0026). As to claim 12, Geshi et al. discloses wherein the retainer of the first current collector includes a first wall extending toward the bottom of the case and facing the second part, and an inner flange part continuous with the first wall and supporting the surface close to the enlarged diameter part in the inner surfaces of the groove (figure 4b number 600). As to claim 13, Geshi et al. discloses wherein the retainer of the first current collector further includes a second wall that is continuous with the inner flange part, extends toward the bottom of the case, and faces the tubular part (figure 4b number 600). As to claim 14, Geshi et al. discloses wherein the first part is flush with a surface of the first current collector (figure 4b number 600). As to claim 15 Geshi et al. discloses wherein the periphery surrounding each of the first through-holes of the first current collector is welded to a bent part at a boundary between the first part and the second part over an entire circumference of the bent part (figure 4b number 600). As to claim 16, Geshi et al. discloses wherein the periphery surrounding each of the first through-holes of the first current collector is welded to a bent part at a boundary between the first part and the second part over at a plurality of welds along a periphery of the bent part (figure 4b number 600). As to claim 17, Geshi et al. discloses wherein the sealing member includes: a sealing plate with conductivity; and a gasket that insulates the sealing plate from the enlarged diameter part, and the sealing plate is electrically connected to the second electrode of the electrode assembly (paragraph 0034). As to claim 18, Geshi et al. discloses further comprising: a second current collector electrically connected to the second electrode of the electrode assembly, wherein an insulating member is interposed between the first current collector and the second current collector, the insulating member includes a first surface in contact with the second current collector, and a second surface located opposite to the first surface, the second surface being in contact with the first current collector (figure 4b number 700,800,600). As to claim 19, Geshi et al. discloses, wherein the second current collector includes a region facing the sealing plate, the region including a second through-hole, and a tongue-shaped lead extending from a periphery of the second through-hole toward an inside of the second through-hole, and the tongue-shaped lead is electrically connected to the sealing plate (figure 4b number 700,703,701). As to claim 20, Geshi et al. fail to disclose wherein the tubular part has a maximum outer diameter larger than a minimum outer diameter of the groove, and the periphery surrounding each of the first through-holes of the first current collector does not overlap a surface close to the tubular part in the inner surfaces of the groove. Takano et al. teaches wherein the tubular part has a maximum outer diameter larger than a minimum outer diameter of the groove, and the periphery surrounding each of the first through-holes of the first current collector does not overlap a surface close to the tubular part in the inner surfaces of the groove (figure 1 number 150) for the purpose of anchoring the metal case to a holder (paragraph 0026). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant's invention was made to provide Geshi et al. with wherein the tubular part has a maximum outer diameter larger than a minimum outer diameter of the groove, and the periphery surrounding each of the first through-holes of the first current collector does not overlap a surface close to the tubular part in the inner surfaces of the groove for the purpose of anchoring the metal case to a holder (paragraph 0026). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1,3-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JANE J RHEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1499. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday (10-6:30). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Miriam Stagg can be reached at 571-270-5256. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JANE J RHEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1724
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 15, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jan 15, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12665183
ION-CONDUCTIVE SOLID AND ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665221
ION-CONDUCTIVE SOLID AND ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658511
ALL SOLID SECONDARY BATTERY, ALL SOLID SECONDARY BATTERY STRUCTURE AND PREPARATION METHOD FOR ALL SOLID SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658542
RIVETING STRUCTURE OF ELECTRODE TERMINAL, AND SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY PACK, AND AUTOMOBILE COMPRISING SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651789
Battery Cell and Manufacturing Method Thereof
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+12.4%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1127 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month