Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/758,503

POWER PORT CONNECTOR FOR MEDICAL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 07, 2022
Examiner
MONAHAN, MEGAN ELIZABETH
Art Unit
3795
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Gyrus ACMI, Inc. D/B/A Olympus Surgical Technologies America
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 11m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
62 granted / 106 resolved
-11.5% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
149
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.7%
+1.7% vs TC avg
§102
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§112
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 106 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 09/22/2025 has been entered. Response to Amendment The amendment filed 08/25/2025 has been entered. In the present application, claims 46-64 are currently pending. Claims 1-45 and 65 have been canceled. Claims 46-64 are examined below. Claims 46, 52, and 61-62 have been amended. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, dated 08/25/2025, regarding the pending claims have been considered. Applicant has amended the independent claims with newly added limitations. Such newly added limitations change the scope of the claims and renders the rejections previously identified in the final office action dated 06/20/2025 moot. Therefore, the rejections within the final office action dated 06/20/2025 have been withdrawn. However, upon further search and consideration, a new ground of rejection is made below. Please see section 35 U.S.C. §103 below for further explanation. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 46-49 and 51-64 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Beaupre et al. (US12004799) hereinafter Beaupre, in view of Irion et al. (US8613699) hereinafter Irion. Regarding Claim 46, Beaupre discloses a surgical device comprising: an elongated shaft (Beaupre: Fig. 1 elongated shaft 92) configured to be guided via an access stabilizer (Beaupre: Fig. 3 trocar cannula housing 86); a housing (Beaupre: Figs. 1-3 instrument body 94) mechanically coupled to the elongated shaft (Beaupre: Fig. 1 elongated shaft 92), the elongated shaft (Beaupre: Fig. 1 elongated shaft 92) extending distal from the housing (Beaupre: Figs. 1-3 instrument body 94); an electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) having an opening (Beaupre: Fig. 3 center opening of instrument connector 50 where elongated shaft 92 resides) wherein the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) is configured to at least partially surround the elongated shaft (Beaupre: Fig. 1 elongated shaft 92), wherein the elongated shaft (Beaupre: Fig. 1 elongated shaft 92) is configured to extend through and longitudinally translate through the opening (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 center opening of instrument connector 50 where elongated shaft 92 resides) in the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50); wherein the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) is configured to transition between a connected state (Beaupre: Fig. 2 mated engagement [col. 2 lines 50-57] “In FIG. 2 , the signal interface adapter and instrument connector are in mating engagement, with the shaft of the surgical instrument fully extended into the trocar cannula.”) and a disconnected state (Fig. 1 unmated engagement), the connected state (Beaupre: Fig. 2 mated engagement [col. 2 lines 50-57]) including the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) electrically and mechanically connected (Beaupre: [col. 6 lines 13-33]) to a complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12) of the access stabilizer (Beaupre: Fig. 3 trocar cannula housing 86), the disconnected state (Beaupre: Fig. 1 unmated engagement) including the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) electrically and mechanically disconnected (Beaupre: Fig. 3, [col. 6 lines 13-33]) from the complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12); one or more electrical interconnects (Beaupre: Figs. 1-5 instrument cable 52) electrically and mechanically attached to the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) and within the housing (Beaupre: Figs. 1-3 instrument body 94, [col. 11 lines 29-57]), the one or more electrical interconnects (Beaupre: Figs. 1-5 instrument cable 52) configured to transmit or receive an electrical signal (Beaupre: [col. 10 line 38 -col. 11 line7) from or provide the electrical signal to the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50); and Beaupre is silent whether further comprising a shroud having a proximal end and an opposing distal end and configured to transition the electrical port between the connected state and the disconnected state as the elongated shaft longitudinally translates out of the opening, the shroud situated around the elongated shaft, the shroud configured to surround the one or more electrical interconnects, the proximal end of the shroud attached to the housing outside of the one or more electrical interconnects, and the distal end of the shroud attached to the electrical port outside of the one or more electrical interconnects. However Irion, in the same field of endeavor teaches, a shroud (Irion: Figs. 1-5 sterile hose 14) having a proximal end (Irion: Fig. 1 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 26 and in Fig. 5 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 22) and an opposing distal end (Irion: Fig. 1 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 16, and in Fig. 5 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 48) and configured to transition the electrical port (Irion: Fig. 5 near handle 50) between the connected state (Irion: Figs. 4-5, when handling element 12 is mated to transfer station 18) and the disconnected state (Irion: Fig. 1, when handling element 12 is NOT mated to transfer station 18) as the elongated shaft (Irion: Fig. 5 cable 52) longitudinally translates out of the opening (Irion: Fig. 1 opening near operating par 20), the shroud (Irion: Figs. 1-5 sterile hose 14) situated around the elongated shaft (Irion: Fig. 5 cable 52), the shroud (Irion: Figs. 1-5 sterile hose 14) configured to surround the one or more electrical interconnects (Irion: [col. 6 lines 54-59] “The sterilization-sensitive operating part 20 contains sensitive electronic components and an integrated lighting unit with LEDs or respectively fibre optics, not illustrated here.”), the proximal end (Irion: Fig. 1 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 26 and in Fig. 5 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 22) of the shroud (Irion: Figs. 1-5 sterile hose 14) attached to the housing (Irion: Fig. 1 near operating part 20) outside of the one or more electrical interconnects (Irion: [col. 6 lines 54-59] “The sterilization-sensitive operating part 20 is designed in this exemplary embodiment as a handle 50, connected to a cable 52. The sterilization-sensitive operating part 20 contains sensitive electronic components and an integrated lighting unit with LEDs or respectively fibre optics, not illustrated here.”), and the distal end (Irion: Fig. 1 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 16, and in Fig. 5 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 48) of the shroud (Irion: Figs. 1-5 sterile hose 14) attached to the electrical port (Irion: Fig. 5 near handle 50) outside of the one or more electrical interconnects (Irion: [col. 6 lines 54-59]). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Beaupre with the teachings of Irion to further comprising a shroud having a proximal end and an opposing distal end and configured to transition the electrical port between the connected state and the disconnected state as the elongated shaft longitudinally translates out of the opening, the shroud situated around the elongated shaft, the shroud configured to surround the one or more electrical interconnects, the proximal end of the shroud attached to the housing outside of the one or more electrical interconnects, and the distal end of the shroud attached to the electrical port outside of the one or more electrical interconnects for the benefit of having “a device for the sterile sheathing of a sterilization-sensitive operating part of the abovementioned type to the effect that connecting the medical instrument to the sterilization-sensitive operating part and sheathing the sterilization-sensitive operating part can be done easily by one person, one-handed if possible, without any danger of a contamination of the sterilization-sensitive operating part” (Irion: [col. 2 lines 16-23]). Regarding Claim 47, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical device of claim 46, wherein the shroud (Irion: Figs. 1-5 sterile hose 14) is rotatable (Irion: Fig. 4 arrow) around the elongated shaft (Irion: Fig. 5 cable 52). Regarding Claim 48, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical device of claim 46, wherein the shroud (Irion: Figs. 1-5 sterile hose 14) is collapsible (Irion: Figs. 1-5) Regarding Claim 49, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical device of claim 48, wherein the one or more electrical interconnects include electrical wires (Irion: [col. 6 lines 54-59] “The sterilization-sensitive operating part 20 is designed in this exemplary embodiment as a handle 50, connected to a cable 52. The sterilization-sensitive operating part 20 contains sensitive electronic components and an integrated lighting unit with LEDs or respectively fibre optics, not illustrated here.”) and the shroud (Irion: Figs. 1-5 sterile hose 14) completely surrounds a portion of the electrical wires (Irion: [col. 6 lines 54-59]) and outside of the housing (Irion: Fig. 1 near operating part 20) Regarding Claim 51, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical device of claim 46, wherein the shroud (Irion: Figs. 1-5 sterile hose 14) is attached to the electrical port (Irion: Fig. 5 near handle 50) outside of the electrical interconnects (Irion: Fig. 5 [col. 6 lines 54-59] “The sterilization-sensitive operating part 20 is designed in this exemplary embodiment as a handle 50, connected to a cable 52. The sterilization-sensitive operating part 20 contains sensitive electronic components and an integrated lighting unit with LEDs or respectively fibre optics, not illustrated here.”). Regarding Claim 52, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical device of claim 46, wherein the complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12) is mechanically coupled to or integrally formed with the access stabilizer (Beaupre: Fig. 3 trocar cannula housing 86). Regarding Claim 53, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical device of claim 52, wherein the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) is configured to break an electrical and mechanical contact with the complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12) during removal of (Beaupre: [col. 10 lines 1-13] “The instrument connector (50) is slidingly mounted on the elongate shaft (92) of a powered surgical instrument (90) that extends distally away from the instrument body (94) (also commonly referred to as the instrument handle).”) the elongated shaft (Beaupre: Fig. 1 elongated shaft 92) from the opening (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 opening within instrument connector 50). Regarding Claim 54, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical device of claim 52, wherein the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) has a keyed surface (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5) configured to mate with the complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12). Regarding Claim 55, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical device of claim 54, wherein the keyed surface includes at least one of a magnet or a contoured surface configured to align the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) with the complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12, [col. 12 line 39 – col. 13 line 8] “As also seen in FIGS. 4 and 5 , a pair of opposite polarity magnetic regions, e.g., from magnets (20N, 20S), are provided on signal interface adapter (12) adjacent the proximal face (18) thereof. Similarly, a pair of opposite polarity magnetic regions, e.g., from magnets (58N, 58S), are provided on instrument connector (50) adjacent the distal face (56) thereof. Although the opposite polarity magnetic regions can be arranged at any of a variety of circumferentially spaced-apart locations on the interface adapter (12) and instrument connector (50), in the embodiment shown the magnets of each component (12, 50) of the interface system are located 180 degrees apart (i.e., on opposite sides of the central aperture), with the orientation of their polarities reversed. Such an arrangement maximizes magnetically induced rotational torque on the instrument connector (50) during mating engagement of the two components (12, 50). Although a single magnet can be used on each component (12, 50), with the magnets arranged to provide magnetic fields of opposite polarity, the use of two magnets arranged to provide magnetic fields of opposite polarity adjacent the mating face of each component not only increases the magnetic forces that pull the components into alignment, but also helps to ensure that the instrument connector (50) cannot be advanced towards the interface adapter (12) in such a way that the magnetic forces are unable to pull the components (12, 50) into proper, mating engagement.”). Regarding Claim 56, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical device of claim 55, wherein the keyed surface (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 the surface between components 12 and 50) includes the contoured surface (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5) and the contoured surface (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5) includes one or more bumps (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 pogo pins 26A-C), depressions, grooves (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 islands 64A-B, or a combination thereof. Regarding Claim 57, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical device of claim 55, wherein the keyed surface (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 the surface between components 12 and 50) includes the contoured surface and the contoured surface reduces a number of orientations in which the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) and the complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12) can mate (Beaupre: [col. 12 line 39 – col. 13 line 8]). Regarding Claim 58, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical device of claim 57, wherein the number of orientations in which the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) and the complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12) can mate is two (Beaupre: [col. 12 line 39 – col. 13 line 8]). Regarding Claim 59, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical device of claim 58, wherein the keyed surface (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 the surface between components 12 and 50) further includes the magnet (Beaupre: [col. 12 line 39 – col. 13 line 8]). Regarding Claim 60, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical device of claim 59, wherein the magnet further reduces the number of orientations in which the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) and the complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12) can mate to one (Beaupre: [col. 12 line 39 – col. 13 line 8]). Regarding Claim 61, Beaupre discloses a surgical device comprising: an access stabilizer (Beaupre: Fig. 3 trocar cannula housing 86) including a complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12); an elongated shaft (Beaupre: Fig. 1 elongated shaft 92) configured to be guided via the access stabilizer (Beaupre: Fig. 3 trocar cannula housing 86); a housing (Beaupre: Figs. 1-3 instrument body 94) mechanically coupled to the elongated shaft (Fig. 1 elongated shaft 92), the elongated shaft (Beaupre: Fig. 1 elongated shaft 92) extending distal from the housing (Beaupre: Figs. 1-3 instrument body 94); an electrical port (Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) including an opening wherein the electrical is configured to at least partially surround the elongated shaft (Fig. 1 elongated shaft 92), wherein the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) has a keyed surface (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 the surface between components 12 and 50) configured to mate with a corresponding keyed surface (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 the surface between components 12 and 50) of the complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12) and wherein the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) is configured to transition between a connected state (Beaupre: Fig. 2 mated engagement [col. 2 lines 50-57] “In FIG. 2 , the signal interface adapter and instrument connector are in mating engagement, with the shaft of the surgical instrument fully extended into the trocar cannula.”) and a disconnected state (Beaupre: Fig. 1 unmated engagement), the connected state (Beaupre: Fig. 2 mated engagement [col. 2 lines 50-57]) including the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) electrically and mechanically connected to a complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12) of the access stabilizer (Beaupre: Fig. 3 trocar cannula housing 86), the disconnected state (Beaupre: Fig. 1 unmated engagement) including the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) electrically and mechanically disconnected from the complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12); wherein the elongated shaft (Beaupre: Fig. 1 elongated shaft 92) is configured to extend through and longitudinally translate through the opening (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 opening within instrument connector 50) in the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50), one or more electrical interconnects (Beaupre: Figs. 1-5 instrument cable 52) electrically and mechanically attached to the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) and within the housing (Beaupre: Figs. 1-3 instrument body 94, [col. 11 lines 29-57]), the one or more electrical interconnects (Beaupre: Figs. 1-5 instrument cable 52) configured to transmit or receive an electrical signal (Beaupre: [col. 10 line 38 -col. 11 line7) from or provide the electrical signal to the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50); and Beaupre is silent whether further comprising a shroud having a proximal end and an opposing distal end and configured to transition the electrical port between the connected state and the disconnected state as the elongated shaft longitudinally translates out of the opening, the shroud situated around the elongated shaft, the shroud configured to surround the one or more electrical interconnects, the proximal end of the shroud attached to the housing outside of the one or more electrical interconnects, and the distal end of the shroud attached to the electrical port outside of the one or more electrical interconnects. However Irion, in the same field of endeavor teaches, a shroud (Irion: Figs. 1-5 sterile hose 14) having a proximal end (Irion: Fig. 1 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 26 and in Fig. 5 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 22) and an opposing distal end (Irion: Fig. 1 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 16, and in Fig. 5 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 48) and configured to transition the electrical port (Irion: Fig. 5 near handle 50) between the connected state (Irion: Figs. 4-5, when handling element 12 is mated to transfer station 18) and the disconnected state (Irion: Fig. 1, when handling element 12 is NOT mated to transfer station 18) as the elongated shaft (Irion: Fig. 5 cable 52) longitudinally translates out of the opening (Irion: Fig. 1 opening near operating par 20), the shroud (Irion: Figs. 1-5 sterile hose 14) situated around the elongated shaft (Irion: Fig. 5 cable 52), the shroud (Irion: Figs. 1-5 sterile hose 14) configured to surround the one or more electrical interconnects (Irion: [col. 6 lines 54-59] “The sterilization-sensitive operating part 20 contains sensitive electronic components and an integrated lighting unit with LEDs or respectively fibre optics, not illustrated here.”), the proximal end (Irion: Fig. 1 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 26 and in Fig. 5 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 22) of the shroud (Irion: Figs. 1-5 sterile hose 14) attached to the housing (Irion: Fig. 1 near operating part 20) outside of the one or more electrical interconnects (Irion: [col. 6 lines 54-59] “The sterilization-sensitive operating part 20 is designed in this exemplary embodiment as a handle 50, connected to a cable 52. The sterilization-sensitive operating part 20 contains sensitive electronic components and an integrated lighting unit with LEDs or respectively fibre optics, not illustrated here.”), and the distal end (Irion: Fig. 1 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 16, and in Fig. 5 portion of hose 14 near reference numeral 48) of the shroud (Irion: Figs. 1-5 sterile hose 14) attached to the electrical port (Irion: Fig. 5 near handle 50) outside of the one or more electrical interconnects (Irion: [col. 6 lines 54-59]). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Beaupre with the teachings of Irion to further comprising a shroud having a proximal end and an opposing distal end and configured to transition the electrical port between the connected state and the disconnected state as the elongated shaft longitudinally translates out of the opening, the shroud situated around the elongated shaft, the shroud configured to surround the one or more electrical interconnects, the proximal end of the shroud attached to the housing outside of the one or more electrical interconnects, and the distal end of the shroud attached to the electrical port outside of the one or more electrical interconnects for the benefit of having “a device for the sterile sheathing of a sterilization-sensitive operating part of the abovementioned type to the effect that connecting the medical instrument to the sterilization-sensitive operating part and sheathing the sterilization-sensitive operating part can be done easily by one person, one-handed if possible, without any danger of a contamination of the sterilization-sensitive operating part” (Irion: [col. 2 lines 16-23]). Regarding Claim 62, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical system of claim 61, wherein the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) is configured to break an electrical and mechanical contact with the complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12) during removal of (Beaupre: [col. 10 lines 1-13] “The instrument connector (50) is slidingly mounted on the elongate shaft (92) of a powered surgical instrument (90) that extends distally away from the instrument body (94) (also commonly referred to as the instrument handle).”) the elongated shaft (Beaupre: Fig. 1 elongated shaft 92) from the opening (Figs. 1-2 opening within instrument connector 50). Regarding Claim 63, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical system of claim 61, wherein the keyed surface (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 the surface between components 12 and 50) includes at least one of a magnet or a contoured surface configured to align the electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 1-2 instrument connector 50) with the complementary electrical port (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 signal interface adapter 12, [col. 12 line 39 – col. 13 line 8] “As also seen in FIGS. 4 and 5 , a pair of opposite polarity magnetic regions, e.g., from magnets (20N, 20S), are provided on signal interface adapter (12) adjacent the proximal face (18) thereof. Similarly, a pair of opposite polarity magnetic regions, e.g., from magnets (58N, 58S), are provided on instrument connector (50) adjacent the distal face (56) thereof. Although the opposite polarity magnetic regions can be arranged at any of a variety of circumferentially spaced-apart locations on the interface adapter (12) and instrument connector (50), in the embodiment shown the magnets of each component (12, 50) of the interface system are located 180 degrees apart (i.e., on opposite sides of the central aperture), with the orientation of their polarities reversed. Such an arrangement maximizes magnetically induced rotational torque on the instrument connector (50) during mating engagement of the two components (12, 50). Although a single magnet can be used on each component (12, 50), with the magnets arranged to provide magnetic fields of opposite polarity, the use of two magnets arranged to provide magnetic fields of opposite polarity adjacent the mating face of each component not only increases the magnetic forces that pull the components into alignment, but also helps to ensure that the instrument connector (50) cannot be advanced towards the interface adapter (12) in such a way that the magnetic forces are unable to pull the components (12, 50) into proper, mating engagement.”). Regarding Claim 64, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical system of claim 61, Beaupre continues to disclose wherein the keyed surface (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 the surface between components 12 and 50) includes the contoured surface (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5) and the contoured surface (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5) includes one or more bumps (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 pogo pins 26A-C), depressions, grooves (Beaupre: Figs. 3-5 islands 64A-B), or a combination thereof. Claim 50 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Beaupre et al. (US12004799) hereinafter Beaupre, in view of Irion et al. (US8613699) hereinafter Irion, in view of Yabe et al. (US5924977) hereinafter Yabe. Regarding Claim 50, Beaupre in view of Irion teach the surgical device of claim 46 but are silent as to wherein the shroud includes fabric, polymer, wire, fiber, or a combination thereof. However Yabe in the same field of endeavor, teach wherein the shroud (Yabe: over cover 149) includes fabric, polymer, wire, fiber, or a combination thereof (Yabe: [col. 15 lines 1-23] “…The outer cover 149 is made of a transparent Synthetic resin sheet having a thickness Smaller than 0.5 mm and having good water proof and expansion properties. For instance, the Outer cover 149 may be made of inexpensive PVC.”) (Yabe: [col. 15 lines 1-23] “…The outer cover 149 is made of a transparent Synthetic resin sheet having a thickness Smaller than 0.5 mm and having good water proof and expansion properties. For instance, the Outer cover 149 may be made of inexpensive PVC.”) It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Beaupre in view of Irion with the teachings of Yabe wherein the shroud includes fabric, polymer, wire, fiber, or a combination thereof for the benefit of the shroud being water proof (Yabe: [col. 15 lines 1-23]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure: Jaworek et al. (US8647261); Hershey et al. (US2008/0145815); Perkins (US5496259); Lafferty et al. (5301657); and Steve Livneh (US2015/0100053) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MEGAN E MONAHAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7330. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Carey can be reached on (571) 270-7235. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MEGAN ELIZABETH MONAHAN/Examiner, Art Unit 3795
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 07, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 23, 2025
Interview Requested
Apr 30, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 30, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
May 05, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 13, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Aug 25, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 02, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 01, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 18, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593960
Endoscope provided with a device for closing a fluid flow circuit, for improved sterilisation
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588799
IMAGE DIAGNOSIS ASSISTANCE APPARATUS, ENDOSCOPE SYSTEM, IMAGE DIAGNOSIS ASSISTANCE METHOD, AND IMAGE DIAGNOSIS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582291
ENDOSCOPE AND ENDOSCOPE ILLUMINATION SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582299
ENDOSCOPE COMPRISING A BENDING SECTION HAVING INDIVIDUAL SEGMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12543932
WIRE-DRIVEN MANIPULATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+21.7%)
3y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 106 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month