Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/759,060

CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION FEEDBACK FOR MULTIPLE TRANSMISSION RECEPTION POINTS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 19, 2022
Examiner
FOTAKIS, ARISTOCRATIS
Art Unit
2633
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
531 granted / 745 resolved
+9.3% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
780
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 745 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on December 23, 2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed December 23, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicants submit that Park describes a general precoder selection mechanism and an operational scenario where multiple TRPs use specific layer allocations during transmission. Park's generic distribution of layers for multi-layer transmission fails to teach or suggest that specific "set[s] of respective multiple columns" are "selected by the UE as sub-portions" of matrices that correspond to particular TRPs. Park further fails to teach or suggest that specific "sub-portions of' the respective matrices are reported "for each respective transmission reception point of the combination of transmission reception points associated with the transmission mode," and "for each transmission mode in a second subset of the plurality of transmission modes," as recited in amended independent claim 1. In response to applicant's arguments against the references individually, one cannot show nonobviousness by attacking references individually where the rejections are based on combinations of references. See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 208 USPQ 871 (CCPA 1981); In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 231 USPQ 375 (Fed. Cir. 1986). Examiner submits that Gao teaches of wherein the respective partial precoding matrix information report for each transmission mode in the second subset (layer indicator, Paragraph 0292) indicates a set of multiple columns selected by the UE (from a layer indicator of a CSI report performed by the UE, Paragraphs 0040 and 0294) as sub-portions of a respective matrix (subset of columns, Paragraph 0294) for a respective transmission reception point of a combination of transmission reception points associated with the transmission mode in the second subset (TRP1/TRP2, TRP1/TRP3 and TRP2/TRP3, Paragraphs 0116 and 0251). Therefore, the combination of Gao, Park and Jin teach all the limitations of the independent claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1, 21, 24, 44 – 46 and 53 – 56 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gao et al (US 2022/0094399) in view of Park et al (US 2020/0383091) and further in view of Jin et al (US 2019/0334594). Re claims 1 and 46, Gao teaches of a method for wireless communication, comprising: receiving, at a user equipment (UE) (WD, Figures 6 – 8 and 10), a request for precoding matrix information related to a plurality of transmission modes associated with a plurality of transmission reception points (plurality of TRPs, Figures 6 – 8 and 17) for a network device (CSI feedback report request, #S142, Fig.16); transmitting, from the UE to the network device, a respective precoding matrix information report (first CSI feedback in a CSI feedback report, #S146, Fig.16 and single TRP, DPS, Paragraphs 0109 and 0114) for each transmission mode in a first subset of the plurality of transmission modes (CSI #1 for TRP #1, CSI #2 for TRP #2, CSI #3 for TRP #3, for DPS, Paragraphs 0109, 0114 and 0240 – 0241), wherein each transmission mode in the first subset of the plurality of transmission modes corresponds to transmission from a single transmission reception point of the plurality of transmission reception points (each CSI corresponds to a TRP, CSI #1 for TRP #1, CSI #2 for TRP #2, CSI #3 for TRP #3, for DPS, Paragraphs 0109, 0114 and 0240 – 0241); and transmitting, from the UE to the network device, a respective partial precoding matrix information report (second CSI feedback in a CSI feedback report, #S146, Fig.16 and multi-TRP, NC-JT, Paragraphs 0109, 0116 – 0117, 0125, 0235, 0242 – 0248, 0294 and 0300) for each transmission mode in a second subset of the plurality of transmission modes (NC-JT CSI #4 for {TRP #1, TRP #2}, NC-JT CSI #5 for {TRP #1, TRP #3}, NC-JT CSI #6 for {TRP #2, TRP #3}, Paragraph 0109 and Paragraphs 0116 – 0117, 0125, 0235, 0242 – 0251, 0294 and 0300), wherein each transmission mode in the second subset of the plurality of transmission modes corresponds to transmission from at least two transmission reception points of the plurality of transmission reception points (each CSI corresponds to a plurality of TRPs, NC-JT CSI #4 for {TRP #1, TRP #2}, NC-JT CSI #5 for {TRP #1, TRP #3}, NC-JT CSI #6 for {TRP #2, TRP #3}, Paragraph 0109 and Paragraphs 0116 – 0117, 0125, 0235, 0242 – 0251, 0294 and 0300), wherein the respective partial precoding matrix information report for each transmission mode in the second subset (layer indicator, Paragraph 0292) indicates a set of multiple columns selected by the UE (from a layer indicator of a CSI report performed by the UE, Paragraphs 0040 and 0294) as sub-portions of a respective matrix (subset of columns, Paragraph 0294) for a respective transmission reception point of a combination of transmission reception points associated with the transmission mode in the second subset (TRP1/TRP2, TRP1/TRP3 and TRP2/TRP3, Paragraphs 0116 and 0251), and wherein each respective partial precoding matrix information report (NC-JT CSI) comprises a smaller quantity of bits than each respective precoding matrix information report (TRP CSI) (NC-JT CSI (smaller quantity of bits) being part of the TRP CSI (full quantity of bits), Paragraphs 0237 and 0294). However, Gao does not specifically teach of wherein the respective partial precoding matrix information report for each transmission mode in the second subset indicates a partial precoding matrix comprising a set of columns for each respective transmission point of a combination of transmission reception points. Gao does not specifically teach of wherein a respective precoding matrix associated with each transmission mode in the second subset is associated with a block diagonalization of the respective matrices for each respective transmission reception point of the combination of transmission reception points associated with the transmission mode. Park teaches of a respective partial precoding matrix information report (feedback information, Paragraph 0118) for each transmission mode in the second subset (NC-JT, Paragraph 0231) indicates a partial precoding matrix comprising a set of columns (number of columns is the same as the number of layers, Paragraph 0118) for each respective transmission point of a combination of transmission reception points (TRP1 may perform two-layer transmission (using a set of two columns of a precoding matrix), and TRP2 may perform two-layer transmission (using another set of two columns of the precoding matrix), Paragraph 0231). Jin teaches of a precoding matrix that is approximately represented by a weighted sum of a plurality of component matrices may need to be reconstructed before being used for precoding. A purpose of the reconstruction may be for setting precoding vectors of different receive end devices orthogonal to each other, so as to reduce interference caused by a signal sent to one receive end device to another receive end device. The reconstruction process may be performed according to a plurality of algorithms, for example without limitation to, a zero forcing (Zero Forcing, ZF) algorithm, a minimum mean square error (Minimum Mean Square Error, MMSE) algorithm, and a block diagonalization (Block Diagonalization, BD) algorithm (Paragraph 0169). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have known that in a codebook matrix each column corresponds to a layer and have the partial precoding matrix comprise a set of columns for each respective transmission point of a combination of transmission reception points for increased throughput. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a respective precoding matrix associated with a block diagonalization of the respective matrices for reconstructing efficiently each precoding matrix separately for each respective transmission reception point of the combination of transmission reception points. Re claim 21, Gao teaches of wherein: the respective precoding matrix information report for a transmission mode in the first subset comprises a first quantity of information (Single TRP CSI, Paragraphs 0239 – 0241); and the respective partial precoding matrix information report for a transmission mode in the second subset comprises a second quantity of information that is less than the first quantity of information (the precoding matrix for NC-JT comprises a subset of column(s) of the precoding matrix associated with the single TRP CSI, Paragraphs 0294 and 0300). Re claim 24, Gao teaches of a method for wireless communication, comprising: transmitting, from a network device (Network Node, #16, Fig.10) to a user equipment (UE) (WD, #22, Fig.10), a request for precoding matrix information related to a plurality of transmission modes associated with a plurality of transmission reception points for the network device (see claim 1); receiving, at the network device from the UE, a respective precoding matrix information report for each transmission mode in a first subset of the plurality of transmission modes, wherein each transmission mode in the first subset of the plurality of transmission modes corresponds to transmission from a single transmission reception point of the plurality of transmission reception points; receiving, at the network device from the UE, a respective partial precoding matrix information report for each transmission mode in a second subset of the plurality of transmission modes (see claim 1), wherein each transmission mode in the second subset of the plurality of transmission modes corresponds to transmission from at least two transmission reception points of the plurality of transmission reception points (each CSI corresponds to a plurality of TRPs, NC-JT CSI #4 for {TRP #1, TRP #2}, NC-JT CSI #5 for {TRP #1, TRP #3}, NC-JT CSI #6 for {TRP #2, TRP #3}, Paragraph 0109 and Paragraphs 0116 – 0117, 0125, 0235, 0242 – 0251, 0294 and 0300), wherein the respective partial precoding matrix information report for each transmission mode in the second subset (layer indicator, Paragraph 0292) indicates a set of multiple columns selected by the UE (from a layer indicator of a CSI report performed by the UE, Paragraphs 0040 and 0294) as sub-portions of a respective matrix (subset of columns, Paragraph 0294) for a respective transmission reception point of a combination of transmission reception points associated with the transmission mode in the second subset (TRP1/TRP2, TRP1/TRP3 and TRP2/TRP3, Paragraphs 0116 and 0251), and wherein each respective partial precoding matrix information report (NC-JT CSI) comprises a smaller quantity of bits than each respective precoding matrix information report (TRP CSI) (NC-JT CSI (smaller quantity of bits) being part of the TRP CSI (full quantity of bits), Paragraphs 0237 and 0294); determining a precoding matrix for a transmission mode in the second subset (precoding matrix for NC-JT, Paragraphs 0235 – 0248, 0294 and 0300) based at least in part on a first precoding matrix information report for a first transmission mode in the first subset (CSI for TRP#1, Paragraphs 0238 – 0248, 0294 and 0300), a second precoding matrix information report for a second transmission mode in the first subset (CSI for TRP#2, Paragraphs 0238 – 0248, 0294 and 0300), and a partial precoding matrix information report for the transmission mode in the second subset (Paragraphs 0236 – 0248); and communicating with the UE based at least in part on the precoding matrix for the transmission mode in the second subset (Paragraphs 0235 – 0248). However, Gao does not specifically teach of wherein the respective partial precoding matrix information report for each transmission mode in the second subset indicates a partial precoding matrix comprising a set of columns for each respective transmission point of a combination of transmission reception points. Gao does not specifically teach of wherein a respective precoding matrix associated with each transmission mode in the second subset is associated with a block diagonalization of the respective matrices for each respective transmission reception point of the combination of transmission reception points associated with the transmission mode. Park teaches of a respective partial precoding matrix information report (feedback information, Paragraph 0118) for each transmission mode in the second subset (NC-JT, Paragraph 0231) indicates a partial precoding matrix comprising a set of columns (number of columns is the same as the number of layers, Paragraph 0118) for each respective transmission point of a combination of transmission reception points (TRP1 may perform two-layer transmission (using a set of two columns of a precoding matrix), and TRP2 may perform two-layer transmission (using another set of two columns of the precoding matrix), Paragraph 0231). Jin teaches of a precoding matrix that is approximately represented by a weighted sum of a plurality of component matrices may need to be reconstructed before being used for precoding. A purpose of the reconstruction may be, for example without limitation to, setting precoding vectors of different receive end devices orthogonal to each other, so as to reduce interference caused by a signal sent to one receive end device to another receive end device. The reconstruction process may be performed according to a plurality of algorithms, for example without limitation to, a zero forcing (Zero Forcing, ZF) algorithm, a minimum mean square error (Minimum Mean Square Error, MMSE) algorithm, and a block diagonalization (Block Diagonalization, BD) algorithm (Paragraph 0169). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have known that in a codebook matrix each column corresponds to a layer and have the partial precoding matrix comprise a set of columns for each respective transmission point of a combination of transmission reception points for increased throughput. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a respective precoding matrix associated with a block diagonalization of the respective matrices for reconstructing efficiently each precoding matrix separately for each respective transmission reception point of the combination of transmission reception points. Re claim 44, Gao teaches of an apparatus for wireless communication, comprising: one or more processors (#86, Fig.10) of a user equipment (UE) (#22, Fig.10), memory coupled with the one or more processors (#88, Fig.10); and instructions stored in the memory and executable by the one or more processors individually or collectively to cause the apparatus to: receive, at the UE, a request for precoding matrix information related to a plurality of transmission modes associated with a plurality of transmission reception points for a network device; transmit, from the UE to the network device, a respective precoding matrix information report for each transmission mode in a first subset of the plurality of transmission modes, wherein each transmission mode in the second subset of the plurality of transmission modes corresponds to transmission from a single transmission reception point of the plurality of transmission reception points; and transmit, from the UE to the network device, a respective partial precoding matrix information report for each transmission mode in a second subset of the plurality of transmission modes (see claim 1), wherein each transmission mode in the second subset of the plurality of transmission modes corresponds to transmission from at least two transmission reception points of the plurality of transmission reception points (each CSI corresponds to a plurality of TRPs, NC-JT CSI #4 for {TRP #1, TRP #2}, NC-JT CSI #5 for {TRP #1, TRP #3}, NC-JT CSI #6 for {TRP #2, TRP #3}, Paragraph 0109 and Paragraphs 0116 – 0117, 0125, 0235, 0242 – 0251, 0294 and 0300), wherein the respective partial precoding matrix information report for each transmission mode in the second subset (layer indicator, Paragraph 0292) indicates a set of multiple columns selected by the UE (from a layer indicator of a CSI report performed by the UE, Paragraphs 0040 and 0294) as sub-portions of a respective matrix (subset of columns, Paragraph 0294) for a respective transmission reception point of a combination of transmission reception points associated with the transmission mode in the second subset (TRP1/TRP2, TRP1/TRP3 and TRP2/TRP3, Paragraphs 0116 and 0251), and wherein each respective partial precoding matrix information report (NC-JT CSI) comprises a smaller quantity of bits than each respective precoding matrix information report (TRP CSI) (NC-JT CSI (smaller quantity of bits) being part of the TRP CSI (full quantity of bits), Paragraphs 0237 and 0294). However, Gao does not specifically teach of wherein the respective partial precoding matrix information report for each transmission mode in the second subset indicates a partial precoding matrix comprising a set of columns for each respective transmission point of a combination of transmission reception points. Gao does not specifically teach of wherein a respective precoding matrix associated with each transmission mode in the second subset is associated with a block diagonalization of the respective matrices for each respective transmission reception point of the combination of transmission reception points associated with the transmission mode. Park teaches of a respective partial precoding matrix information report (feedback information, Paragraph 0118) for each transmission mode in the second subset (NC-JT, Paragraph 0231) indicates a partial precoding matrix comprising a set of columns (number of columns is the same as the number of layers, Paragraph 0118) for each respective transmission point of a combination of transmission reception points (TRP1 may perform two-layer transmission (using a set of two columns of a precoding matrix), and TRP2 may perform two-layer transmission (using another set of two columns of the precoding matrix), Paragraph 0231). Jin teaches of a precoding matrix that is approximately represented by a weighted sum of a plurality of component matrices may need to be reconstructed before being used for precoding. A purpose of the reconstruction may be, for example without limitation to, setting precoding vectors of different receive end devices orthogonal to each other, so as to reduce interference caused by a signal sent to one receive end device to another receive end device. The reconstruction process may be performed according to a plurality of algorithms, for example without limitation to, a zero forcing (Zero Forcing, ZF) algorithm, a minimum mean square error (Minimum Mean Square Error, MMSE) algorithm, and a block diagonalization (Block Diagonalization, BD) algorithm (Paragraph 0169). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have known that in a codebook matrix each column corresponds to a layer and have the partial precoding matrix comprise a set of columns for each respective transmission point of a combination of transmission reception points for increased throughput. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a respective precoding matrix associated with a block diagonalization of the respective matrices for reconstructing efficiently each precoding matrix separately for each respective transmission reception point of the combination of transmission reception points. Re claim 45, Gao, Park and Jin teach of an apparatus for wireless communication, comprising: one or more processors (#70, Fig.10 of Gao) of a network device (#16, Fig.10 of Gao), memory coupled with the one or more processors (#72, Fig.10 of Gao); and instructions stored in the memory and executable by the one or more processors individually or collectively to cause the apparatus to: transmit, from the network device to a user equipment (UE), a request for precoding matrix information related to a plurality of transmission modes associated with a plurality of transmission reception points for the network device; receive, at the network device from the UE, a respective precoding matrix information report for each transmission mode in a first subset of the plurality of transmission modes, wherein each transmission mode in the first subset of the plurality of transmission modes corresponds to transmission from a single transmission reception point of the plurality of transmission reception points; receive, at the network device from the UE, a respective partial precoding matrix information report for each transmission mode in a second subset of the plurality of transmission modes, wherein each transmission mode in the second subset of the plurality of transmission modes corresponds to transmission from at least two transmission reception points of the plurality of transmission reception points, wherein the respective partial precoding matrix information report for each transmission mode in the second subset indicates a set of respective multiple columns that are sub-portions of a respective matrix for each respective transmission reception point of a combination of transmission reception points associated with the transmission mode in the second subset, wherein a respective precoding matrix associated with each transmission mode in the second subset is associated with a block diagonalization of the respective matrices for each respective transmission reception point of the combination of transmission reception points associated with the transmission mode, and wherein each respective partial precoding matrix information report comprises a smaller quantity of bits than each respective precoding matrix information report; determine the respective precoding matrix for a transmission mode in the second subset based at least in part on a first precoding matrix information report for a first transmission mode in the first subset, a second precoding matrix information report for a second transmission mode in the first subset, and a partial precoding matrix information report for the transmission mode in the second subset; and communicate with the UE based at least in part on the respective precoding matrix for the transmission mode in the second subset (see claim 24). Re claim 53, Gao teaches of wherein: the respective precoding matrix information report for a transmission mode in the first subset comprises a first quantity of information; and the respective partial precoding matrix information report for a transmission mode in the second subset comprises a second quantity of information that is less than the first quantity of information (see claim 21). Re claims 54 – 56, Gao teaches of wherein the plurality of transmission reception points comprises three of more transmission reception points (TRP #1 – TRP #3, Paragraph 0250), and wherein the second subset of the plurality of transmission modes comprises two or more transmission modes (NC-JT CSI #4 for {TRP #1, TRP #2}, NC-JT CSI #5 for {TRP #1, TRP #3}, NC-JT CSI #6 for {TRP #2, TRP #3}, Paragraph 0109 and Paragraphs 0116 – 0117, 0125, 0235, 0242 – 0251, 0294 and 0300). Claims 3, 12, 20, 26, 35 and 51 – 52 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gao, Park and Jin in view of Zhang et al (US 2020/0220591). Re claims 3 and 51, Gao, Park and Jin teach all the limitations of claims 1 and 44 except of further comprising: determining, for each transmission mode in the first subset, a respective first set of values for a respective spatial domain basis matrix; and determining, for each transmission mode in the first subset, a respective second set of values for a respective coefficient matrix, each element of the respective coefficient matrix comprising a coefficient for a corresponding beam within a corresponding transmission layer, wherein: the respective precoding matrix information report for a transmission mode in the first subset indicates the respective first set of values and the respective second set of values for the transmission mode in the first subset . Zhang teaches of determining a respective first set of values for a respective spatial domain basis matrix (W1, spatial bases, Fig.12); and determining a respective second set of values for a respective coefficient matrix (W2, compressed combination coefficients, Fig.12), each element of the respective coefficient matrix comprising a coefficient for a corresponding beam (Paragraph 0175, Fig.12) within a corresponding transmission layer (lth layer, Paragraph 0175), wherein: the respective precoding matrix information report for a transmission mode in the first subset indicates the respective first set of values and the respective second set of values for the transmission mode in the first subset (Paragraphs 0015 – 0016 and 0175 – 0179). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have determined a respective first set of values for a respective spatial domain basis matrix and a respective second set of values for a respective coefficient matrix to perform precoding associated with Type II CSI reporting. Re claims 12 and 52, Gao, Park and Jin teach all the limitations of claims 1 and 44 except of further comprising: determining, for each transmission mode in the first subset, a respective first set of values for a respective spatial domain basis matrix; determining, for each transmission mode in the first subset, a respective second set of values for a respective coefficient matrix, wherein elements of the respective coefficient matrix comprise linear combination coefficients for a set of beams; and determining, for each transmission mode in the first subset, a respective third set of values for a respective frequency domain basis matrix, wherein: the respective precoding matrix information report for a transmission mode in the first subset indicates the respective first set of values, the respective second set of values, and the respective third set of values for the transmission mode in the first subset. Zhang teaches of determining a respective first set of values for a respective spatial domain basis matrix (W1, spatial bases, Figures 9 and 12); determining a respective second set of values for a respective coefficient matrix (W2, compressed combination coefficients, Figures 9 and 12), wherein elements of the coefficient matrix comprise linear combination coefficients for a set of beams (Paragraphs 0175 – 0176, Figures 9 and 12); and determining, for each transmission mode in the first subset, a respective third set of values for a respective frequency domain basis matrix (Paragraphs 0175 – 0179, Wf, Figures 9 and 12), wherein: the respective precoding matrix information report for a transmission mode in the first subset indicates the respective first set of values, the respective second set of values, and the respective third set of values for the transmission mode in the first subset (Paragraphs 0015 – 0016 and 0175 – 0179). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have determined a respective first set of values for a respective spatial domain basis matrix, a respective second set of values for a respective coefficient matrix and a respective frequency domain basis matrix to perform precoding associated with Type II CSI reporting. Re claim 20, Gao, Park, Jin and Zhang teach all the limitations of claim 12 as well as Zhang teaches of wherein: the respective first set of values for a transmission mode corresponds to a first set of one or more codebook indices for a precoding matrix for the transmission mode (as shown in Figures 9 and 12); and the respective third set of values for the transmission mode corresponds to a second set of one or more codebook indices for the precoding matrix for the transmission mode (as shown in Figures 9 and 12). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the first and second set of values for a transmission mode correspond to sets of one or more codebook indices so as to construct the spatial basis and frequency domain basis matrices. Re claim 26, Gao, Park and Jin teach all the limitations of claim 24 except of wherein the first precoding matrix information report for the first transmission mode in the first subset indicates a first set of values for a spatial domain basis matrix and a second set of values for a coefficient matrix, each element of the coefficient matrix comprising a coefficient for a corresponding beam within a corresponding transmission layer, the method further comprising: determining the precoding matrix for the first transmission mode in the first subset based at least in part on the spatial domain basis matrix and the coefficient matrix. Zhang teaches of a first precoding matrix information report indicates a first set of values for a spatial domain basis matrix and a second set of values for a coefficient matrix, each element of the coefficient matrix comprising a coefficient for a corresponding beam within a corresponding transmission layer (see claim 3), the method further comprising: determining the precoding matrix based at least in part on the spatial domain basis matrix and the coefficient matrix (Figures 9 and 12). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have determined a respective first set of values for a respective spatial domain basis matrix and a respective second set of values for a respective coefficient matrix to perform precoding associated with Type II CSI reporting. Re claim 35, Gao, Park and Jin teach all the limitations of claim 24 except of wherein the first precoding matrix information report for the first transmission mode in the first subset indicates a first set of values for a spatial domain basis matrix, a second set of values for a coefficient matrix, and a third set of values for a frequency domain basis matrix, and wherein elements of the coefficient matrix comprise linear combination coefficients for a set of beams, the method further comprising: determining the precoding matrix for the transmission mode in the first subset based at least in part on the spatial domain basis matrix, the coefficient matrix, and the frequency domain basis matrix. Zhang teaches of wherein the first precoding matrix information report for the first transmission mode in the first subset indicates a first set of values for a spatial domain basis matrix, a second set of values for a coefficient matrix, and a third set of values for a frequency domain basis matrix, and wherein elements of the coefficient matrix comprise linear combination coefficients for a set of beams (see claim 12), the method further comprising: determining the precoding matrix for the transmission mode in the first subset based at least in part on the spatial domain basis matrix, the coefficient matrix, and the frequency domain basis matrix (Figures 9 and 12). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have determined a respective first set of values for a respective spatial domain basis matrix, a respective second set of values for a respective coefficient matrix and a respective frequency domain basis matrix to perform precoding associated with Type II CSI reporting. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 – 10, 14 – 16,18, 27, 29, 31, 33, 36, 38, 40 and 42 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARISTOCRATIS FOTAKIS whose telephone number is (571)270-1206. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sam K Ahn can be reached on (571) 272-3044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ARISTOCRATIS FOTAKIS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 19, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 17, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 15, 2024
Response Filed
Mar 07, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
May 10, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
May 22, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 11, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 15, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 09, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 13, 2024
Response Filed
Jan 23, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Mar 06, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 06, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 07, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 08, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 22, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 26, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 01, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 23, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603807
DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND DEVICE FOR FRAME SYNCHRONIZATION, AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592707
CIRCUITS FOR ONLINE ADAPTIVE DC OFFSET CORRECTION AND RECEIVERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587260
BEAM WEIGHT ADAPTATION TO REALIZE ENHANCED BEAM PROPERTIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587417
APPARATUS AND METHOD OF PERFORMING CHANNEL SOUNDING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574271
FREQUENCY SHIFT KEYING (FSK)-MODULATED SIGNAL DISCRIMINATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.8%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 745 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month