Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/759,148

DIFFERENT RELIABILITY LEVELS FOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT/NEGATIVE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (ACK/NACK) TRANSMISSIONS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 20, 2022
Priority
Jan 21, 2020 — GR 20200100027 +3 more
Examiner
LINDENBAUM, ALAN LOUIS
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
6 (Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
64%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
210 granted / 434 resolved
-9.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
492
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
58.6%
+18.6% vs TC avg
§102
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 434 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 7/20/2022, 8/16/2023 and 5/2/2024 have been considered by the examiner. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed June 22, 2026 have been fully considered but they are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1, 8-9, 12, 18, 193, 196-199, 201-202, 204, 207-210, 212-213, 215-216 and 219-223 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Al-Imari et al. (US 2019/0053217) in view of Lee et al. (US 2021/0368453), and further in view of Xiong et al. (US 2020/0236670). Regarding claim 1, Al-Imari discloses a method of wireless communication (Al-Imari, paragraph [0010], wirelessly communicating), comprising: receiving, by a user equipment (UE) from a base station (BS), a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) configuration (Al-Imari, paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520), wherein the PUCCH configuration comprises a PUCCH transmit power control parameter for a PUCCH signal (Al-Imari, paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520), wherein the PUCCH configuration comprises a first negative acknowledgement (NACK) transmission configuration associated with a first PUCCH format (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520), wherein the first NACK transmission configuration comprises a first NACK transmission power increment (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520), wherein the PUCCH configuration indicates a transmit power boost is to be applied to the NACK transmissions for the first PUCCH format (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520), wherein the PUCCH configuration further comprises a second NACK transmission configuration associated with a second PUCCH format different from the first PUCCH format, and wherein the second NACK transmission configuration comprises a second NACK transmission power increment (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520); receiving, by the UE from the BS, a data transmission (Al-Imari, Fig. 1, DL Signal; paragraph [0022], downlink signal may comprise a data signal); and transmitting, by the UE to the BS, the physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) signal including a NACK for the data transmission (Al-Imari, Fig. 1, DL Signal; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH) based on the PUCCH transmit power control parameter, a PUCCH format of the first PUCCH format or the second PUCCH format, and one of the first NACK transmission configuration or the second NACK transmission configuration (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520). Al- Imari does not explicitly disclose wherein the PUCCH configuration further comprises a second NACK transmission configuration associated with a second PUCCH format different from the first PUCCH format, and wherein the second NACK transmission configuration comprises a second NACK transmission power increment. Lee discloses wherein the PUCCH configuration further comprises a second NACK transmission configuration associated with a second PUCCH format different from the first PUCCH format, and wherein the second NACK transmission configuration comprises a second NACK transmission power increment (Lee, paragraph [0167], table 6, PUCCH formats 1, 1a, 1b, 2, 2a, 2b having numbers of bits; paragraph [0257], unlike ACK/NACK transmission using PUCCH format 1a/1b, a plurality of ACK/NACK information may be transmitted through a PUCCH format 3; paragraph [0258]-[0260], PUCCH format 3 having an ACK/NACK payload with a size of 12 bits; paragraph [0285], URLLC service has a higher priority and reliability; paragraph [0286]-[0292], power boosting degree based ratio of NACK bits to ACK bits, drop lower priority ACK bits, power control parameter considering priority of services, PUCCH format 1/2/3 power parameter). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Lee into the system of Al- Imari in order to reduce transmission error in URLLC service (Lee; [0022]). The combination of Al- Imari and Lee does not explicitly disclose wherein the PUCCH configuration indicates the first PUCCH format is for NACK transmissions without other uplink control information. Xiong discloses wherein the PUCCH configuration indicates the first PUCCH format is for NACK transmissions without other uplink control information (Xiong, paragraph [0208], table having PUCCH formats 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 having numbers of bits, format 0 has 1-2 symbols, 1-2 bits; paragraph [0267], a second PUCCH resource configured for 1-bit HARQ-NACK only transmission; a PUCCH format having only one bit that is used for NACK-only transmission means that no other UCI is included in that PUCCH format). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Xiong into the system the combination of Al- Imari and Lee does in order to improve link budget and uplink coverage for control channel communication (Xiong; [0156]). Regarding claim 8, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Rao, particularly Al-Imari discloses wherein, a PUCCH transmit power control parameter comprises a first transmit power offset for a non-NACK transmission, and wherein the first NACK transmission power increment comprises a second transmit power offset different from the first transmit power offset (Al-Imari, Fig. 1, DL Signal; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520). Regarding claim 9, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Rao, particularly Al-Imari discloses wherein the second transmit power offset corresponds to a higher transmit power than the first transmit power offset (Al-Imari, Fig. 1, DL Signal; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520). Regarding claim 12, Al-Imari does not explicitly disclose wherein the first NACK transmission configuration includes: receiving, by the UE from the BS, at least one of a NACK-specific PUCCH format 0 configuration, a NACK-specific PUCCH format 1 configuration, a NACK-specific PUCCH format 2 configuration, a NACK-specific PUCCH format 3 configuration, or a NACK-specific PUCCH format 4 configuration. Lee discloses wherein the first NACK transmission configuration includes: receiving, by the UE from the BS, at least one of a NACK-specific PUCCH format 0 configuration, a NACK-specific PUCCH format 1 configuration, a NACK-specific PUCCH format 2 configuration, a NACK-specific PUCCH format 3 configuration, or a NACK-specific PUCCH format 4 configuration (Lee, paragraph [0293], PUCCH format 1/2/3 parameters defined so that power is determined by bits of transmitted uplink control information). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Lee into the system of Al- Imari in order to reduce transmission error in URLLC service (Lee; [0022]). Regarding claim 18, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Rao, particularly Al-Imari discloses wherein the PUCCH configuration further comprises: a first resource allocation for a non-NACK transmission; and a second resource allocation different from the first resource allocation (Al-Imari, Fig. 1, DL Signal; paragraph [0031], different configurations to transmit ACK and NACK may comprise different resource blocks). Regarding claim 193, Al-Imari discloses an apparatus for wireless (Al-Imari, paragraph [0010], transmission receiver capable of wirelessly communicating with nodes of a wireless network), the apparatus comprising: an interface configured to obtain a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) configuration from a network entity, wherein the PUCCH configuration comprises a PUCCH transmit power control parameter for a PUCCH signal, wherein the PUCCH configuration comprises a PUCCH transmit power control parameter, wherein the PUCCH configuration comprises a first negative acknowledgement (NACK) transmission configuration associated with a first PUCCH format, wherein the first NACK transmission configuration comprises a first NACK transmission power increment, (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520; the Examiner interprets different sets of ACK/NACK power parameter offset values as different logical channels, such as would be needed for higher latency and reliability requirements for URLLC), wherein the PUCCH configuration indicates a transmit power boost is to be applied to the NACK transmissions for the first PUCCH format (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520), wherein the PUCCH configuration further comprises a second NACK transmission configuration associated with a second PUCCH format different from the first PUCCH format (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520; the Examiner interprets different sets of ACK/NACK power parameter offset values as different logical channels, such as would be needed for higher latency and reliability requirements for URLLC); and a processing system configured to communicate with the network entity in accordance with the PUCCH transmit power control parameter, a PUCCH format of the first PUCCH format or the second PUCCH format, and one of the first NACK transmission configuration or the second NACK transmission configuration (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520; the Examiner interprets different sets of ACK/NACK power parameter offset values as different logical channels, such as would be needed for higher latency and reliability requirements for URLLC). Al- Imari does not explicitly disclose wherein the PUCCH configuration further comprises a second NACK transmission configuration associated with a second PUCCH format different from the first PUCCH format, and wherein the second NACK transmission configuration comprises a second NACK transmission power increment. Lee discloses wherein the PUCCH configuration further comprises a second NACK transmission configuration associated with a second PUCCH format different from the first PUCCH format, and wherein the second NACK transmission configuration comprises a second NACK transmission power increment (Lee, paragraph [0167], table 6, PUCCH formats 1, 1a, 1b, 2, 2a, 2b having numbers of bits; paragraph [0257], unlike ACK/NACK transmission using PUCCH format 1a/1b, a plurality of ACK/NACK information may be transmitted through a PUCCH format 3; paragraph [0258]-[0260], PUCCH format 3 having an ACK/NACK payload with a size of 12 bits; paragraph [0285], URLLC service has a higher priority and reliability; paragraph [0286]-[0292], power boosting degree based ratio of NACK bits to ACK bits, drop lower priority ACK bits, power control parameter considering priority of services, PUCCH format 1/2/3 power parameter). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Lee into the system of Al- Imari in order to reduce transmission error in URLLC service (Lee; [0022]). The combination of Al- Imari and Lee does not explicitly disclose wherein the PUCCH configuration indicates the first PUCCH format is for NACK transmissions without other uplink control information. Xiong discloses wherein the PUCCH configuration indicates the first PUCCH format is for NACK transmissions without other uplink control information (Xiong, paragraph [0208], table having PUCCH formats 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 having numbers of bits, format 0 has 1-2 symbols, 1-2 bits; paragraph [0267], a second PUCCH resource configured for 1-bit HARQ-NACK only transmission). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Xiong into the system the combination of Al- Imari and Lee does in order to improve link budget and uplink coverage for control channel communication (Xiong; [0156]). Regarding claim 196, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Rao, particularly Al-Imari discloses wherein the mechanism to increase reliability comprises at least one of: increased transmission power; use of at least one of different time resources or frequency resources; transmitting the NACK feedback with repetition; or transmitting the NACK feedback on an uplink channel without multiplexing other signals therein (Al-Imari, Fig. 1, DL Signal; paragraph [0005], ACK/NACK feedback; paragraph [0035], transmit the NACK with more repetitions; paragraph [0038], transmitting NACK information with enhanced reliability; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH;, paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520). Regarding claim 197, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Rao, particularly Al-Imari discloses wherein the repetition comprises at least one of: repetition in space using multiple beams, repetition in frequency, or repetition in time therein (Al-Imari, paragraph [0035], transmit the NACK with more repetitions). Regarding claim 198, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Rao, particularly Al-Imari discloses wherein the processing system communicates with the network entity in accordance with the acknowledgment feedback mode by: generating the NACK feedback for transmission to the network entity; or monitoring for the NACK feedback transmitted from the network entity in accordance with the acknowledgment feedback mode (Al-Imari, Fig. 1, DL Signal; paragraph [0005], ACK/NACK feedback; paragraph [0035], transmit the NACK with more repetitions; paragraph [0038], transmitting NACK information with enhanced reliability; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH;, paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520). Regarding claim 199, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Rao, particularly Al-Imari discloses wherein the signaling comprises a downlink control information with a field indicating the acknowledgment feedback mode (Al-Imari, paragraph [0022], downlink control signal PDCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520). Regarding claim 201, Al-Imari does not explicitly disclose wherein the signaling comprises a medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) or radio resource control (RRC) message. Lee discloses wherein the signaling comprises a medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) or radio resource control (RRC) message (Lee, paragraph [282], configured via RRC signaling and/or MAC-CE). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Lee into the system of Al- Imari in order to reduce transmission error in URLLC service (Lee; [0022]). Regarding claim 202, Al-Imari does not explicitly disclose wherein the RRC message comprises a RRC setup message, a RRC reconfiguration message, a RRC reestablishment message, or a RRC resume message. Lee discloses the apparatus of claim 201, wherein the RRC message comprises a RRC setup message, a RRC reconfiguration message, a RRC reestablishment message, or a RRC resume message (Lee, paragraph [282], configured via RRC signaling and/or MAC-CE). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Lee into the system of Al- Imari in order to reduce transmission error in URLLC service (Lee; [0022]). Regarding claim 204, Al-Imari discloses an apparatus for wireless (Al-Imari, paragraph [0010], transmission receiver capable of wirelessly communicating with nodes of a wireless network), the apparatus comprising: an interface configured to output, for transmission to a user equipment (UE), a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) configuration from a network entity, wherein the PUCCH configuration comprises a PUCCH transmit power control parameter for a PUCCH signal, wherein the PUCCH configuration comprises a PUCCH transmit power control parameter, wherein the PUCCH configuration comprises a first negative acknowledgement (NACK) transmission configuration associated with a first PUCCH format, wherein the first NACK transmission configuration comprises a first NACK transmission power increment, (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520; the Examiner interprets different sets of ACK/NACK power parameter offset values as different logical channels, such as would be needed for higher latency and reliability requirements for URLLC), wherein the PUCCH configuration indicates a transmit power boost is to be applied to the NACK transmissions for the first PUCCH format (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520), wherein the PUCCH configuration further comprises a second NACK transmission configuration associated with a second PUCCH format different from the first PUCCH format (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520; the Examiner interprets different sets of ACK/NACK power parameter offset values as different logical channels, such as would be needed for higher latency and reliability requirements for URLLC); and a processing system configured to communicate with the UE in accordance with the PUCCH transmit power control parameter, a PUCCH format of the first PUCCH format or the second PUCCH format, and one of the first NACK transmission configuration or the second NACK transmission configuration (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520; the Examiner interprets different sets of ACK/NACK power parameter offset values as different logical channels, such as would be needed for higher latency and reliability requirements for URLLC). Al- Imari does not explicitly disclose wherein the PUCCH configuration further comprises a second NACK transmission configuration associated with a second PUCCH format different from the first PUCCH format, and wherein the second NACK transmission configuration comprises a second NACK transmission power increment. Lee discloses wherein the PUCCH configuration further comprises a second NACK transmission configuration associated with a second PUCCH format different from the first PUCCH format, and wherein the second NACK transmission configuration comprises a second NACK transmission power increment (Lee, paragraph [0167], table 6, PUCCH formats 1, 1a, 1b, 2, 2a, 2b having numbers of bits; paragraph [0257], unlike ACK/NACK transmission using PUCCH format 1a/1b, a plurality of ACK/NACK information may be transmitted through a PUCCH format 3; paragraph [0258]-[0260], PUCCH format 3 having an ACK/NACK payload with a size of 12 bits; paragraph [0285], URLLC service has a higher priority and reliability; paragraph [0286]-[0292], power boosting degree based ratio of NACK bits to ACK bits, drop lower priority ACK bits, power control parameter considering priority of services, PUCCH format 1/2/3 power parameter). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Lee into the system of Al- Imari in order to reduce transmission error in URLLC service (Lee; [0022]). The combination of Al- Imari and Lee does not explicitly disclose wherein the PUCCH configuration indicates the first PUCCH format is for NACK transmissions without other uplink control information. Xiong discloses wherein the PUCCH configuration indicates the first PUCCH format is for NACK transmissions without other uplink control information (Xiong, paragraph [0208], table having PUCCH formats 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 having numbers of bits, format 0 has 1-2 symbols, 1-2 bits; paragraph [0267], a second PUCCH resource configured for 1-bit HARQ-NACK only transmission). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Xiong into the system the combination of Al- Imari and Lee does in order to improve link budget and uplink coverage for control channel communication (Xiong; [0156]). Claims 204 and 207-209 are rejected under substantially the same rationale as claims 193 and 196-198, respectively. Claim 212 is rejected under substantially the same rationale as claim 201. Claim 213 is rejected under substantially the same rationale as claim 202. Claim 215 is rejected under substantially the same rationale as claim 193. Al-Imari additionally discloses at least one antenna in paragraph [0037]. Claim 216 is rejected under substantially the same rationale as claim 204. Al-Imari additionally discloses at least one antenna in paragraph [0037]. Regarding claim 217, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Rao, particularly Al-Imari discloses wherein the NACK transmission configuration is associated with an acknowledgment feedback mode in which a NACK feedback is transmitted with a mechanism to increase reliability relative to positive acknowledgment (ACK) feedback transmitted in the acknowledgment feedback mode or a second acknowledgment feedback mode (Al-Imari, Fig. 1, DL Signal; paragraph [0005], ACK/NACK feedback; paragraph [0038], transmitting NACK information with enhanced reliability; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH;, paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520). Claims 218 is rejected under substantially the same rationale as claim 117. Regarding claim 219, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Rao, particularly Al-Imari discloses wherein the first NACK transmission configuration is associated with a first logical channel that is configured to serve ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC) traffic, and wherein the second NACK transmission configuration is associated with a second logical channel that is configured to serve non-URLLC traffic (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520; the Examiner interprets different sets of ACK/NACK power parameter offset values as different logical channels, such as would be needed for higher latency and reliability requirements for URLLC). Regarding claim 220, Al-Imari does not explicitly disclose wherein the PUCCH configuration comprises a third NACK transmission configuration that corresponds to a third PUCCH format, wherein the PUCCH configuration comprises a fourth NACK transmission configuration that corresponds to a fourth PUCCH format, and wherein the PUCCH configuration comprises a fifth NACK transmission configuration that corresponds to a fifth PUCCH format. Lee discloses wherein the PUCCH configuration comprises a third NACK transmission configuration that corresponds to a third PUCCH format, wherein the PUCCH configuration comprises a fourth NACK transmission configuration that corresponds to a fourth PUCCH format, and wherein the PUCCH configuration comprises a fifth NACK transmission configuration that corresponds to a fifth PUCCH format (Lee, paragraph [0285], URLLC service has a higher priority and reliability; paragraph [0286]-[0292], power boosting degree may be pre-defined for each ratio of NACK bits to ACK bits, drop lower priority ACK bits, power control parameter considering priority of services, PUCCH format 1/2/3 power parameter the Examiner interprets each pre-defined boosting degree and each type of service to be a distinct NACK transmission configuration). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Lee into the system of Al- Imari in order to reduce transmission error in URLLC service (Lee; [0022]). Regarding claim 221, the combination of Al-Imari and Lee does not explicitly disclose wherein the first PUCCH format includes a PUCCH format 0, a PUCCH format 1, a PUCCH format 2, a PUCCH format 3, or a PUCCH format 4. Xiong discloses wherein the first PUCCH format includes a PUCCH format 0, a PUCCH format 1, a PUCCH format 2, a PUCCH format 3, or a PUCCH format 4 (Xiong, paragraph [0208], table having PUCCH formats 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 having numbers of bits, format 0 has 1-2 symbols, 1-2 bits). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Xiong into the system the combination of Al- Imari and Lee does in order to improve link budget and uplink coverage for control channel communication (Xiong; [0156]). Regarding claim 222, Al-Imari discloses wherein the transmitting includes: transmitting, by the UE to the BS, the PUCCH signal with the transmit power boost applied to the transmit power of the PUCCH signal (Al-Imari, paragraph 0004], URLLC demands higher requirements for latency and reliability; paragraph [0030], offset power value dynamically configured by the network according to power headroom report; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH; paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520) Regarding claim 223, Al-Imari does not explicitly disclose wherein the transmit power boost corresponds to the first NACK transmission power increment or the second NACK transmission power increment based on the PUCCH format of the PUCCH signal. Lee discloses wherein the transmit power boost corresponds to the first NACK transmission power increment or the second NACK transmission power increment based on the PUCCH format of the PUCCH signal (Lee, paragraph [0167], table 6, PUCCH formats 1, 1a, 1b, 2, 2a, 2b having numbers of bits; paragraph [0257], unlike ACK/NACK transmission using PUCCH format 1a/1b, a plurality of ACK/NACK information may be transmitted through a PUCCH format 3; paragraph [0258]-[0260], PUCCH format 3 having an ACK/NACK payload with a size of 12 bits; paragraph [0285], URLLC service has a higher priority and reliability; paragraph [0286]-[0292], power boosting degree based ratio of NACK bits to ACK bits, drop lower priority ACK bits, power control parameter considering priority of services, PUCCH format 1/2/3 power parameter). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Lee into the system of Al- Imari in order to reduce transmission error in URLLC service (Lee; [0022]). Claim(s) 10-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Al-Imari et al. (US 2019/0053217) in view of Lee et al. (US 2021/0368453), and further in view of Xiong et al. (US 2020/0236670), and further in view of Gotoh et al. (US 2021/0045092). Regarding claim 10, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong does not disclose wherein the PUCCH transmit power control parameter comprises a first target received power for a non-NACK transmission, and wherein the first NACK transmission power increment comprises a second target received power different from the first target received power. Gotoh discloses wherein the PUCCH transmit power control parameter comprises a first target power for a non-NACK transmission, and wherein the first NACK transmission power increment comprises a second target power different from the first target received power (Gotoh, paragraph [0128], multiple target received powers used in dynamic scheduling; paragraph [0152], PUCCH transmission power control for URLLC for transmitting ACK/NACK; paragraph [0153], PUCCH target received power configured). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Gotoh into the system of the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong, in order to improve reliability for transmitting a transport block (Gotoh; [0012]). Regarding claim 11, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee, Xiong and Gotoh, particularly Al-Imari discloses the method of claim 10, wherein the second target received power is greater than the first target received power (Al-Imari, paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520). Claim(s) 13-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Al-Imari et al. (US 2019/0053217) in view of Lee et al. (US 2021/0368453), and further in view of Xiong et al. (US 2020/0236670), and further in view of Kang et al. (US 2021/0084640). Regarding claim 13, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong does not disclose wherein the PUCCH configuration further includes: a beam parameter indicating a number of transmission beams. Kang discloses wherein the PUCCH configuration further includes:, a beam parameter indicating a number of transmission beams (Kang, paragraph [0260], number of beams configured differently according to PUCCH format for information having a high priority such as NACK). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Kang into the system of the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong, in order that unnecessary power consumption can be reduced and communication disconnection and delay problems until recovery can be prevented (Kang; [0024]). Regarding claim 14, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong does not disclose wherein the PUCCH signal is a first PUCCH signal, and wherein the transmitting includes: transmitting, by the UE to the BS, the first PUCCH signal including the NACK in a first beam direction; and transmitting, by the UE to the BS based on the beam parameter, a second PUCCH signal including the NACK in a second beam direction different from the first beam direction. Kang discloses wherein the PUCCH signal is a first PUCCH signal, and wherein the transmitting includes: transmitting, by the UE to the BS, the first PUCCH signal including the NACK in a first beam direction; and transmitting, by the UE to the BS based on the beam parameter, a second PUCCH signal including the NACK in a second beam direction different from the first beam direction (Kang, paragraph [0275], base station receives PUCCH using beams in two directions by composite reception). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Kang into the system of the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong, in order that unnecessary power consumption can be reduced and communication disconnection and delay problems until recovery can be prevented (Kang; [0024]). Regarding claim 15, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong does not disclose wherein the beam parameter further indicates a beam sequence including the first beam direction and the second beam direction. Kang discloses wherein the beam parameter further indicates a beam sequence including the first beam direction and the second beam direction (Kang, paragraph [0275], base station may sequentially change the PUCCH beams, base station receives PUCCH using beams in two directions). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Kang into the system of the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong, in order that unnecessary power consumption can be reduced and communication disconnection and delay problems until recovery can be prevented (Kang; [0024]). Regarding claim 16, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong does not disclose wherein the transmitting includes: transmitting, by the UE to the BS, the first PUCCH signal in the first beam direction during a first time period; and transmitting, by the UE to the BS, the second PUCCH signal in the second beam direction during a second time period different from the first time period. Kang discloses wherein the transmitting includes: transmitting, by the UE to the BS, the first PUCCH signal in the first beam direction during a first time period; and transmitting, by the UE to the BS, the second PUCCH signal in the second beam direction during a second time period different from the first time period (Kang, paragraph [0275], base station may sequentially change the PUCCH beams, base station receives PUCCH using beams in two directions). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Kang into the system of the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong, in order that unnecessary power consumption can be reduced and communication disconnection and delay problems until recovery can be prevented (Kang; [0024]). Regarding claim 17, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong does not disclose wherein the transmitting includes: transmitting, by the UE to the BS based on the beam parameter, the second PUCCH signal in the second beam direction simultaneously with the first PUCCH signal in the first beam direction. Kang discloses wherein the transmitting includes: transmitting, by the UE to the BS based on the beam parameter, the second PUCCH signal in the second beam direction simultaneously with the first PUCCH signal in the first beam direction (Kang, paragraph [0275], base station receives PUCCH using beams in two directions simultaneously). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Kang into the system of the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong, in order that unnecessary power consumption can be reduced and communication disconnection and delay problems until recovery can be prevented (Kang; [0024]). Claim(s) 195 and 206 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Al-Imari et al. (US 2019/0053217) in view of Lee et al. (US 2021/0368453), and further in view of Xiong et al. (US 2020/0236670), and further in view of Yin et al. (US 2021/0314104). Regarding claim 195, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong, particularly Al-Imari discloses wherein the acknowledgment feedback mode comprises: a first acknowledgment feedback mode in which the NACK feedback and the ACK feedback are transmitted, wherein the NACK feedback is transmitted with the mechanism to increase reliability relative to the ACK feedback (Al-Imari, Fig. 1, DL Signal; paragraph [0005], ACK/NACK feedback; paragraph [0038], transmitting NACK information with enhanced reliability; paragraph [0045], configuration to transmit a NACK in response to unsuccessful detection of the downlink signal, NACK transmitted on the PUCCH;, paragraph [0046], offset power level to transmit the NACK at power level greater than the ACK; paragraph [0047], receive the offset power level from network apparatus 520; paragraph [0049], receive set of resource blocks from network apparatus 520). The combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong does not disclose a second acknowledgment feedback mode in which only the NACK feedback is transmitted with the mechanism. Yin discloses a second acknowledgment feedback mode in which only the NACK feedback is transmitted with the mechanism (Yin, paragraph [0118], ACK feedback off configuration, ACK does not need to be reported and only NACK is reported). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Yin into the system of the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong, in order to improve communication capacity, speed, flexibility and efficiency (Yin; [0003]). Claim 206 is rejected under substantially the same rationale as claim 195. Claim(s) 203 and 214 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Al-Imari et al. (US 2019/0053217) in view of Lee et al. (US 2021/0368453), and further in view of Xiong et al. (US 2020/0236670), and further in view of Lu et al. (US 2021/0218510). Regarding claim 203, the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong does not disclose does not explicitly disclose wherein the interface is further configured to: output, for transmission to the network entity, a request for the acknowledgment feedback mode, wherein the signaling is obtained after outputting the request. Lu discloses wherein the interface is further configured to: output, for transmission to the network entity, a request for the acknowledgment feedback mode, wherein the signaling is obtained after outputting the request (Lu, paragraph [0082], indication information sent by the network device after the terminal sends a resource request message to the network device). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Lu into the system of the combination of Al-Imari, Lee and Xiong, in order to ensure reliability of data transmission (Lu; [0004]). Claim 214 are rejected under substantially the same rationale as claim 203. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kou et al. (US 20220174666) discloses for NACK-only feedback using PUCCH format 1, a first PUCCH resource for NACK-only transmission is defined. In some embodiments, the first PUCCH resource includes at least one of a RB, one or more OFDM symbols and an initial cyclic shift. Wang et al. (US 20190363840) discloses the base station may schedule only one downlink time unit to fed back HARQ-ACK/NACK in one uplink time unit, and the user terminal performs a feedback according to the HARQ-ACK/NACK of one time unit without HARQ-ACK multiplexing. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALAN LOUIS LINDENBAUM whose telephone number is (571)270-3858. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday 11:00 AM to 7:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Un Cho can be reached on (571) 272-7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.L.L/ Examiner, Art Unit 2413 /UN C CHO/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 18 earlier events
Feb 18, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 02, 2026
Interview Requested
Jun 08, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 22, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739865
CHANNEL MONITORING AND SHARED USE OF A WIRELESS CHANNEL
5y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12726321
Flexible Cross Transmission-Time-Interval Data Portion Transmission in a Wireless Communication System
7y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12707489
RESOURCE EXCLUSION AND TRANSMISSIONS OVER SIDELINK WITH MULTI-TRP ENABLED UES
5y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12696319
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12652690
SYSTEM, METHOD AND APPARATUS TO REDUCE ERROR IN UNUSED TONES IN PARTIAL BANDWIDTH WIRELESS TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
64%
With Interview (+15.9%)
3y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 434 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month