Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/760,298

THERAPEUTIC COMBINATIONS COMPRISING A RAF INHIBITOR FOR USE IN TREATING BRAF MUTANT NSCLC

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 05, 2022
Examiner
ROBINSON, MIKHAIL O'DONNEL
Art Unit
1627
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Novartis AG
OA Round
3 (Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allow Rate
59 granted / 103 resolved
-2.7% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+47.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
153
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
41.6%
+1.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 103 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 10/09/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues the teachings of Cooke does not describe the use of the combination of Compound A and trametinib for the treatment of NSCLC with one or more Class II BRAF mutations or more or Class III BRAF mutation (page 1). Applicant additionally argues Welsch teaches an extensive list of MEK and RAF inhibitors and it would have been hindsight bias to choose the Cooke reference. It is noted from previous office action Cooke teaches the claimed invention combination to treat typical and atypical BRAF NSCLC mutations, which includes Class I-III mutations and Welsch teaches different combinations of MEK and RAF inhibitors which include claimed invention to treat claimed particular NSCLC Class II and Class III BRAF mutations. Applicant has overcome the 112b rejection of claim 5 by the cancelation of the claim. Claims 1, 3-4, 6-8, 13-16, 20, 23 and 32 is now evaluated on its merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3-4, 6-8, 13-16, 20, 23 and 32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cooke (WO 2018203219 A1) in view of Welsch et al. (WO 2018213302 A1). Regarding claims 1, 3-4, 6-8, 13-16, 20, 23 and 32, Cooke teaches a method for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprising administration of a therapeutically effective amount of a combination therapy of formula (I) PNG media_image1.png 162 298 media_image1.png Greyscale and a MEK inhibitor selected from a list which includes trametinib (Page 6, lines 10-15, 27-32). Accordingly, compound of formula (I), or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and Compound of formula (II), or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, in combination with a MEK inhibitor, and in particular with trametinib, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or solvate thereof, for treating solid tumors, particularly tumors that harbor one or more MAPK pathway alterations, e.g. BRAF-mutant, KRAS-mutant and NRAS-mutant cancers (Page 25 lines 7-16). Cooke teaches the treatment of oral dosage form (relevant to claims 7-8 and 13) (page 7, last para.) separately, simultaneously or sequentially (relevant to claim 20) to patients with NSCLC BRAF mutations of NSCLC having at least one V600E or other BRAF mutation, whether typical or atypical, i.e. BRAFV600E-mutant NSCLC or BRAF non- V600E-mutant NSCLC (relevant to claims 1, 6 and 23) (page 27, lines 14-17). Cooke additionally teaches the daily dose of Compound (I) administered twice a day and trametinib administered once daily in the amounts of Table: PNG media_image2.png 145 502 media_image2.png Greyscale (relevant to claims 14-16) (Page 56, last para.), and the treatment led to the reduction or stabilization of tumor size or cancerous cell count (Page 20, 1st para). Cooke fails to teach the combination therapy to treat the specific Class II and Class III BRAF mutant NSCLC from the list of claims 3-4. Welsch teaches a method for the treatment of non-V600E/K BRAF cancers of melanoma, colorectal and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (para. 0019) comprising administration of an effective amount of an ERK inhibitor. Welsch teaches the method further comprises a MEK inhibitor, a RAF inhibitor, an HDAC inhibitor, and combinations thereof (para. 0021). Of the therapeutics the ERK inhibitor can be selected from a list of inhibitors that includes LTT-462 (para. 0008), RAF inhibitor from a list that includes LXH254 PNG media_image1.png 162 298 media_image1.png Greyscale (para. 0135) and MEK inhibitor from a list that includes trametinib (para. 0051). Of the non-V600E/K BRAF Welsch teaches G466E, G464R, G464V, L597R, D594A, D594E, D594G, D594H and K601E (relevant to claims 3-4) (para. 10-14). Welsch additionally teaches the pharmaceutical combination in oral dosage form (para. 0217), administered separately at appropriate intervals (para. 0210) and reduction of the tumor size or cancerous cell count (para. 0228). Therefore, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filling to have administered to a patient with Class II or Class III BRAF NSCLC mutation a pharmaceutical combination comprising PNG media_image1.png 162 298 media_image1.png Greyscale in a total daily dosage from 400-800 mg and trametinib in an amount of 0.5 to 2mg. One would have been motivated to do so from the teachings of Cooke and Welsch on the therapeutics of PNG media_image1.png 162 298 media_image1.png Greyscale and trametinib used to treat non-V600E/K BRAF mutant NSCLC). Cooke teaches the claimed mg range of claimed compound A and trametinib to treat atypical BRAF mutation NSCLC, which includes Class II-III, while Welsch teaches the claimed Class II and Class III BRAF mutant NSCLC (non-V600E/K BRAF mutant NSCLC) to be treated with claimed compound and trametinib. One would have combined the RAF inhibitor of PNG media_image1.png 162 298 media_image1.png Greyscale and MEK inhibitor of trametinib with the claimed range from the teachings of Cooke with the teaching of Welsch of LXH254 and trametinib to treat a Class II and Class III BRAF mutant NSCLC. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MIKHAIL O'DONNEL ROBINSON whose telephone number is (571)270-0777. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kortney Klinkel can be reached at 571-270-5239. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MIKHAIL O'DONNEL. ROBINSON Examiner Art Unit 1627 /MIKHAIL O'DONNEL ROBINSON/Examiner, Art Unit 1627 /SARAH PIHONAK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 05, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 28, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 09, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600729
NEW-TYPE BENZAZEPINE FUSED RING DERIVATIVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595247
SUBSTITUTED PYRAZOLO PIPERIDINE CARBOXYLIC ACIDS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590086
3-((1H-PYRAZOL-4-YL)METHYL)-6'-(PHENYL)-2H-(1,2'-BIPYRIDIN)-2-ONE DERIVATIVES AND RELATED COMPOUNDS AS GPR139 ANTAGONISTS FOR USE IN A METHOD OF TREATMENT OF E.G. DEPRESSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583871
PRMT5 INHIBITORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583825
BENZO[H]QUINAZOLIN-4-AMINE AND THIENO[3,2-H]QUINAZOLIN-4-AMINE DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+47.7%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 103 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month