Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 17/760,626

QUANTITATIVE METHOD OF MEASURING LEAKAGE VOLUME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 15, 2022
Priority
Sep 17, 2019 — provisional 62/901,275 +1 more
Examiner
BAHLS, JENNIFER E. S.
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Curapipe System Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
69%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
331 granted / 570 resolved
-9.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
591
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§103
44.4%
+4.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 570 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Group I, claims 1-6, in the reply filed on 9/25/2025 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 7-11, 13-15, 17-21, and 23 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 9/25/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Barnard et al. (GB 2553833 A). As to claim 1, Barnard et al. teaches a method for measuring a fluid leakage volume in a pipeline network (abstract), the method comprising: a. providing a leakage measurement apparatus (100) comprising: i. a fluid entry conduit (108) comprising a pressure gauge (112) and a fluid flowmeter (110) for introducing said fluid to said pipeline network (figure 1; page 9, lines 19-25); and ii. valves (103) for closing a section of said pipeline network (page 9, lines 11-14); b. determining a fluid flowrate using said fluid flowmeter through said leakage measurement apparatus (page 9, lines 22-26, page 10, lines 29-36, and page 18); and c. adjusting an externally controlled pressure located at a pressure point in said apparatus thereby determining said fluid leakage volume (page 11, line 1-page 12, line 2, page 13, line 14-page 14, line 7, page 18, table 1). As to claim 2, Barnard et al. teaches wherein said pipeline complex is at least partially one of underground and underwater (page 1, lines 3-6, page 4, lines 16-18, and figure 1 show an at least partly underground pipeline). As to claim 3, Barnard et al. teaches wherein said pipeline complex is at least one of underground and underwater (page 1, lines 3-6, page 4, lines 16-18, and figure 1 show an underground pipeline complex). As to claim 4, Barnard et al. teaches further comprising measuring pressure of said pressure point in said pipeline complex using said pressure gauge (page 9, lines 21-22 and page 11, lines 1-9). As to claim 5, Barnard et al. teaches wherein said valves comprise a water inlet valve (103 on the inlet side of 101 having 125 in figure 1) at a first end of a conduit (section of 101 between the valves shown in figure 1), and wherein said pressure gauge and said fluid flowmeter are in fluid connection with said conduit (page 9, lines 12-26). As to claim 6, Barnard et al. teaches wherein said conduit is in fluid connection with said pipeline complex at a second end thereof (see figure 1 where the connection to downstream pipeline complex is shown). Conclusion The prior art and related art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Abhulimen et al. (6,970,808 B2), Rannow (WO 2015/021366 A1), and Soda (WO 2014/091513 A2) teach systems with similarities to the disclosed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENNIFER E S BAHLS whose telephone number is (571)270-7807. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:00 am-5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephen Meier can be reached at (571) 272-2149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNIFER BAHLS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 15, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 09, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12612089
MONITORING PASSING TRAINS, SYSTEM AND METHOD
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12611781
MANUFACTURING OVERHEAD PHOTOGRAMMETRY GUIDANCE SYSTEM FOR ROBOTIC BASED FORMATION AND INSPECTION OF WORKPIECE FEATURES
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12596846
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594637
TOOL DAMAGE DETECTION DEVICE AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584887
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING RESIDUAL LIFE OF COMPONENTS MADE OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS
3y 6m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
69%
With Interview (+10.9%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 570 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month