Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/761,826

METHOD AND DEVICES FOR IMPLANTATION OF BIOLOGIC CONSTRUCTS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 18, 2022
Examiner
PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Kirigenx Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 6m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allow Rate
515 granted / 797 resolved
-5.4% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 6m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
855
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.3%
+2.3% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 797 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/04/2025 has been entered. Priority This application claims priority from provisional application 62/905,988 filed 09/25/2019. Status of Claims Claims 25-30 are pending. Claims 1-24 and 31-39 have been cancelled. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement filed on 12/04/25 have been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 25 and 27 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Blackburn US 2015/0250576 A1in view of Levy US 2011/0245597 A1 and Euteneuer et al (Euteneuer) US 2010/0191332 A1. Blackburn discloses the invention substantially as claimed being a rollable sheet (Figures 4-5) implant 10 (Figures 1-9) comprising: a top layer 12 comprising a biological sheet (Blackburn discloses it as a hernia patch which is considered to be a biological sheet); and a bottom layer 26 comprising a spring material biased to an open flat configuration ([0028] discloses shape memory alloys), the bottom layer further comprising a rollable frame (the claims do not limit how the frame is rolled, for example upon itself or as a whole device, therefore the frame of Blackburn is fully capable of being rolled in a whole expanded configuration from side to side) However, Blackburn does not disclose the frame comprises bioabsorbable material or the inner channels/port. Levy teaches the use of a sheet implant comprising a top layer and a bottom bioabsorbable material [0033] in the same field of endeavor for the purpose of eliminating the removal step and allowing for temporary support while the top layer is absorbed. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the bottom layer of Blackburn to include bioabsorbable material as disclosed by Levy in order to eliminate the removal step and allow for temporary support while the top layer is absorbed Euteneuer teaches the use of a porous plate (Figure 9) comprising a porous top layer 374 in combination with a bottom layer 378 comprising an inflow port 386 for introduction of fluid and inner fluid channels (long open channels in layer 378) including apertures (rectangular ends in layer 378) for disbursement of fluid to the top layer (apertures are in direct communication with the pores 380 of top layer 374) in the same field of endeavor for the purpose of allowing for fluid to be evenly dispersed throughout the implant. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the bottom layer of Blackburn to comprise the frame shape of Euteneuer including the inflow port, channels, and apertures in order to better distribute fluid and forces evenly throughout the entire implant. Furthermore, the channels of Euteneuer disclose an "x" pattern (Figure 9). In regards to claim 27, the combination of Blackburn, Levy, and Euteneuer as combined above read upon this claim in the same manner, the only difference between this claim and claim 25 is the shape of the channels. However, the channels of Euteneuer include a central strip (narrowed up and down opening of Figure 9) with a plurality of ribs extending perpendicular to the central strip (the middle channels extending left and right at a perpendicular angle to the central strip in Figure 9). Claim(s) 26, 28, 29, and 30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Blackburn, Levy, and Euteneuer (Combination 1) as applied to claims 25 and 27 above, and further in view of Koizumi et al (Koizumi) US 2016/0183990 A1. Combination 1 discloses the invention substantially as claimed being described above. Claim 26, 28, 29, and 30 only differ from claim 25 above in their description of the shape of the channels. However, Combination 1 fails to disclose the channels form a honeycomb pattern, a quadrilateral with molded tabs, a round shaped hoop with a plurality of molded tabs disposed on the hoop, or a serpentine shaped spring. Koizumi discloses a porous sheet implant comprising a bottom layer with channels forming honeycomb pattern (Figure 5), a quadrilateral with molded tabs disposed on the corners of the quadrilateral (Figure 9B includes two quadrilateral shaped diamonds with wider portions at the corners considered to read upon the molded tabs), a round shaped hoop with a plurality of molded tabs disposed on the hoop (Figure 10 includes a plurality of small round hoops surrounding reference numbers 68 with struts extending radially outward which are considered to read upon the molded tabs), and/or a serpentine shaped spring (Koizumi diagonal struts in Figure 9A-B). It is old and extremely well known to provide channels to dispersion of fluid in a variety of shapes and patterns. Therefore it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the channels of bottom layer of Blackburn as modified by Euteneuer to have a honeycomb pattern, a quadrilateral pattern with molded tabs, a round shaped hoop with a plurality of molded tabs disposed on the hoop, or a serpentine shaped spring in order to provide uniform distribution of fluid throughout the implant. In regards to claim 30, Euteneuer further teaches the use of a lower second side of the bottom layer of the frame with a plurality of anchors (Abstract and [0061] teaches the use of barbs hooks and staples for aiding with anchoring to surrounding tissue). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 07/17/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant’s arguments focus on the Levy base reference but the prior art rejection has been amended to no longer rely on Levy for the base structure. Blackburn as modified above clearly discloses all the claimed components. This is consistent with the findings of the Chinese Patent Office. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER D PRONE whose telephone number is (571)272-6085. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10 am - 6 pm (HST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Melanie R Tyson can be reached on (571)272-9062. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. CHRISTOPHER D. PRONE Primary Examiner Art Unit 3774 /Christopher D. Prone/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 18, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 17, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 04, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 20, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594175
CORE ASSEMBLY FOR MEDICAL DEVICE DELIVERY SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594153
GENDER-SPECIFIC MESH IMPLANT WITH BARRIER FOR INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588985
COMPLIANT BIOLOGICAL SCAFFOLD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12575934
PROSTHETIC IMPLANTS INCLUDING A FRAME FOR FIXATION TO BONE AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12564492
Retrievable Self-Expanding Non-Thrombogenic Low-Profile Percutaneous Atrioventricular Valve Prosthesis
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+19.4%)
4y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 797 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month