Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/762,837

Method for Generating a Digital Twin of a System or Device

Non-Final OA §101§103
Filed
Mar 23, 2022
Examiner
COOK, BRIAN S
Art Unit
2187
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
302 granted / 489 resolved
+6.8% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
519
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§103
48.1%
+8.1% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 489 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Responsive to the communication dated 12/10/2025. Claims 1 – 17, 19, 21, 29, 31 are cancelled. Claims 18, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 30, 32 are amended. Claims 18, 20, 22 – 28, 30, 32 - 37 are presented for examination. Claims 18, 20, 22 – 28, 30, 32, 34, 35, 36 are allowable. Claims 33, 37 stand rejected. Response to Arguments Claim Objections The Applicant has amended claim 28 to overcome the previous objection. Due to the amendment the objection is withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The Applicant has amended the claims in order to incorporate subject matter that was previously indicated as potentially allowable. Accordingly, the previous rejections under 35 USC 103 are withdrawn. End Response to Arguments Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 33 and 37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because claim 33 recites “a digital twin for a device or installation” which is not one of the statutory categories. MPEP 2106.03 indicates that the four statutory categories include “process, machine, manufacture, and composition of matter.” A “digital twin” is not one of these items because a digital twin is a digital in nature existing only electronically (i.e., digital bits/bytes). A machine is a concrete thing consisting of parts or combination of parts. A digital twin is not concrete as it is only electronic in nature and does not exist in the physical world. A manufacture is also a tangible article that has form, quality, property, or combination through man-made means. A digital twin is not a tangible article with form, quality, property or any combination of these things because a digital twin does not exist in the tangible world. A composition of matter is a combination of two or more substances and includes all composite articles. A digital twin does not contain any matter nor any combination of substances because, again, a digital twin does not exist in the physical, tangible world and therefore cannot be a combination of substances. While claim 33 recites that the digital twin is created by the method of claim 18, when viewed, as a whole the claim does not recite any computer components (i.e., non-transitory memory) or any other non-transitory media upon which the digital twin might exist in order to provide any underlying manufacture or composition. Accordingly, the digital twin is merely a disembodied ephemeral notion existing only as intangible electric data (i.e., bits/bytes). Accordingly, the claimed “digital twin” is, at best, “data er se” Therefore, the claims are not eligible under 35 USC 101. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN S COOK whose telephone number is (571)272-4276. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Emerson Puente can be reached at 571-272-3652. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN S COOK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2187
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 23, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §103
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602035
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DEFINING A SENSOR LAYOUT FOR PALLET ROUTING IN A MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12547793
DIGITAL TWIN SIMULATION BASED COMPLIANCE OPTIMIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12547796
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE BLUEPRINT SELECTION FOR OPTIMIZED RESPONSE TO STATE CHANGING CONDITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12542198
EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM FOR SEARCHING FOR A CHEMICAL STRUCTURE HAVING A TARGET PHYSICAL PROPERTY THAT MAINTAINS STRUCTURAL DIVERSITY AMONG CANDIDATES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12541027
LIDAR SIMULATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+29.6%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 489 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month