Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 17/766,303

PURCHASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, SERVER APPARATUS, PURCHASE MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Apr 04, 2022
Priority
Oct 21, 2019 — JP 2019-191751 +1 more
Examiner
WILDER, ANDREW H
Art Unit
3627
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
8 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
8-9
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
350 granted / 558 resolved
+10.7% vs TC avg
Strong +58% interview lift
Without
With
+58.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
586
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§103
44.1%
+4.1% vs TC avg
§102
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 558 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 4 May 2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Amendment under 37 CFR 1.116 (“Response”), filed 4 May 2026, with respect to the rejection under 35 USC 112 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, Applicant’s deletion of some claim features in the Response has made claims rejectable under the same reasons applied in the Non-Final Rejection mailed 18 August 2025. Claim Objections Claim 12 is objected to because of the following informalities: “The p88urchase” should be --The purchase--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-5, 7-8 and 11-13 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 8 recite the limitation "the control signal". Claim 12 recites “each mobile terminal” however only one mobile terminal is listed. There is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claims. Claims 2-5, 7 and 11-13 are rejected for being dependent on a rejected claim under 35 USC 112(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 8 and 11-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over United States Patent Application Publication No. 2016/0379297 A1 to Aspholm (“Aspholm”) in view of Japanese Publication No. 2019-144797A to Yamashita (“Yamashita”), United States Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0018897 A1 to Bellis, JR. et al. (“Bellis”) and United States Patent Application Publication No. 2018/0232796 A1 to Glaser et al. (“Glaser”). As per claims 1 and 8, the claimed subject matter that is met by Aspholm includes: A purchase management system comprising (Aspholm: Fig. 1): a server apparatus including a first memory storing first instructions, and one or more first processors (Aspholm: ¶¶ 0080 and 0086 and Fig. 1, 112 and Fig. 3); and a checkout machine … configured to execute the second instructions (Aspholm: Fig. 1, 120), wherein the one or more first processors are configured to execute the first instructions to: receive, from a mobile terminal, a store ID acquired by the mobile terminal, and customer identification information identifying a customer who uses the mobile terminal (Aspholm: ¶¶ 0082-0086); receive item identification information, which is scanned from a code attached to each item, from the mobile terminal, and associate the customer identification information with the item identification information (Aspholm: ¶ 0116 and Fig. 4); create a list of items to be purchased based on the item identification information received from the mobile terminal, send the list of items to be purchased to the mobile terminal (Aspholm: ¶¶ 0087 and 0117 and Fig. 1, 104A); and generate checkout information based on the list of items to be purchased and transmit the checkout information to the mobile terminal (Aspholm: ¶¶ 0118-0121), and wherein the one or more second processors are configured to execute the second instructions to: acquire the checkout information from the mobile terminal, and acquire the list of items to be purchased based on the checkout information (Aspholm: ¶ 0121). Aspholm fails to specifically teach 1.) a second memory storing second instructions, and one or more second processors, 2.) update the list of items to be purchased in response to a change in a quantity of the item, caused by an operation of a button for changing the quantity of the item, the button corresponding to the item on an items-to-be-purchased list screen displayed based on the list of items to be purchased at the mobile terminal, 3.) display an age confirmation screen and turn on a light to call a clerk, in a case where an item requiring an age confirmation is included in the list of items to be purchased; acquire age confirmation information; complete the age confirmation in a case where the age confirmation information is acquired; and after the age confirmation is complete, display a checkout end screen; and 4.) while the age confirmation screen is displayed, turn on the light to call a clerk in response to receiving the control signal; and change a lighting state of the light in a case where the age confirmation information is acquired. The Examiner provides Yamashita to teach and disclose claimed features 1 and 3. The claimed subject matter that is met by Yamashita includes: a checkout machine including a second memory storing second instructions, and one or more second processors configured to execute the second instructions (Yamashita: ¶¶ 0008 and 0009), wherein the one or more second processors are configured to execute the second instructions to: display an age confirmation screen in a case where an item requiring an age confirmation is included in the list of items to be purchased (Yamashita: ¶¶ 0053-0058); acquire age confirmation information (Yamashita: ¶¶ 0053-0058); complete the age confirmation in a case where the age confirmation information is acquired (Yamashita: ¶¶ 0053-0058); and after the age confirmation is complete, display a checkout end screen (Yamashita: ¶¶ 0034-0036 and 0053-0055). Aspholm teaches a checkout system and method. Yamashita teaches a comparable checkout system and method that was improved in the same way as the claimed invention. Yamashita offers the embodiment of a checkout machine including a second memory storing second instructions, and one or more second processors configured to execute the second instructions and wherein the one or more second processors are configured to execute the second instructions to: display an age confirmation screen in a case where an item requiring an age confirmation is included in the list of items to be purchased; acquire age confirmation information; and complete the age confirmation in a case where the age confirmation information is acquired. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized the adaptation of the age confirmation screen and checkout as disclosed by Yamashita to the display of the payment machine as taught by Aspholm for the predicted result of improved checkout systems and methods. No additional findings are seen to be necessary. Aspholm and Yamashita fail to specifically teach 2.) update the list of items to be purchased in response to a change in a quantity of the item, caused by an operation of a button for changing the quantity of the item, the button corresponding to the item on an items-to-be-purchased list screen displayed based on the list of items to be purchased at the mobile terminal, 3.) display an age confirmation screen and turn on a light to call a clerk…; and 4.) while the age confirmation screen is displayed, turn on the light to call a clerk in response to receiving the control signal; and change a lighting state of the light in a case where the age confirmation information is acquired. The Examiner provides Bellis to teach and disclose claimed features 3 and 4. The claimed subject matter that is met by Bellis includes: display an age confirmation screen and turn on a light to call a clerk (Bellis: ¶¶ 0055-0056); while the age confirmation screen is displayed, turn on the light to call a clerk in response to receiving the control signal; and change a lighting state of the light in a case where the age confirmation information is acquired (Bellis: ¶¶ 0055-0056). Aspholm and Yamashita teach checkout systems and methods. Bellis teaches a comparable checkout system and method that was improved in the same way as the claimed invention. Bellis offers the embodiment of display an age confirmation screen and turn on a light to call a clerk; and while the age confirmation screen is displayed, turn on the light to call a clerk in response to receiving the control signal; and change a lighting state of the light in a case where the age confirmation information is acquired. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized the adaptation of the age notification light as disclosed by Bellis to the checkout processes as taught by Aspholm, Yamashita and Kaneko for the predicted result of improved checkout systems and methods. No additional findings are seen to be necessary. Aspholm, Yamashita and Bellis fail to specifically teach 2.) update the list of items to be purchased in response to a change in a quantity of the item, caused by an operation of a button for changing the quantity of the item, the button corresponding to the item on an items-to-be-purchased list screen displayed based on the list of items to be purchased at the mobile terminal. The Examiner provides Glaser to teach and disclose claimed feature 2. The claimed subject matter that is met by Glaser includes: update the list of items to be purchased in response to a change in a quantity of the item, caused by an operation of a button for changing the quantity of the item, the button corresponding to the item on an items-to-be-purchased list screen displayed based on the list of items to be purchased at the mobile terminal (Glaser: ¶ 0134 and Fig. 14) Aspholm, Yamashita and Bellis teach checkout systems and methods. Glaser teaches a comparable checkout system and method that was improved in the same way as the claimed invention. Glaser offers the embodiment of update the list of items to be purchased in response to a change in a quantity of the item, caused by an operation of a button for changing the quantity of the item, the button corresponding to the item on an items-to-be-purchased list screen displayed based on the list of items to be purchased at the mobile terminal. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized the adaptation updating the quantity of the item as disclosed by Glaser to the checkout processes as taught by Aspholm, Yamashita and Bellis for the predicted result of improved checkout systems and methods. No additional findings are seen to be necessary. As per claim 11, the claimed subject matter that is met by Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis and Glaser includes: wherein the one or more first processors transmits store information including a price list of a store identified by the store ID in response to receiving the store ID (Aspholm: ¶¶ 0016, 0018, 0042, 0087-0088 and 0091-0092). The motivation for combining the teachings of Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis and Glaser are discussed in the rejection of claim 9, and are incorporated herein. As per claim 12, the claimed subject matter that is met by Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis and Glaser includes: wherein the one or more first processors are configured to execute the first instructions to: transmit, to each mobile terminal, store information concerning items sold in the store corresponding to the store ID received from the mobile terminal, and wherein, in a case where the customer has interrupted shopping at the store for some reason, an items-to-be-purchased list screen corresponding to a transaction status up to that point is displayed on the mobile terminal based on the store information (Aspholm: ¶¶ 0082-0088 and 0094 and Glaser: ¶¶ 0194-0195). The motivation for combining the teachings of Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis and Glaser are discussed in the rejection of claim 1, and are incorporated herein. As per claim 13, the claimed subject matter that is met by Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis and Glaser includes: wherein the store information includes information indicating the transaction status of the customer in the store, and the transaction status becomes new in a case where a new shopping is started at the store (Aspholm: ¶¶ 0082-0088, 0094 and 0129 and Glaser: ¶¶ 0194-0195). The motivation for combining the teachings of Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis and Glaser are discussed in the rejection of claim 1, and are incorporated herein. Claims 2-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aspholm in view Yamashita, Bellis and Glaser as applied in claim 1, and further in view of United States Patent Application Publication No. 2021/0090049 A1 to Kaneko (“Kaneko”). As per claim 2, Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis and Glaser fail to specifically teach wherein the first processor generates checkout screen information and transmit the checkout screen information to the mobile terminal, the checkout screen information including the checkout information when the item requiring the age confirmation is not included in the list of items to be purchased and including the checkout information and an age confirmation message when the item requiring the age confirmation is included in the list of items to be purchased. The Examiner provides Kaneko to teach and disclose this claimed feature. The claimed subject matter that is met by Kaneko includes: wherein the first processor generates checkout screen information and transmit the checkout screen information to the mobile terminal, the checkout screen information including the checkout information when the item requiring the age confirmation is not included in the list of items to be purchased and including the checkout information and an age confirmation message when the item requiring the age confirmation is included in the list of items to be purchased (Kaneko: ¶ 0144). Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis and Glaser teach checkout systems and methods. Kaneko teaches a comparable checkout system and method that was improved in the same way as the claimed invention. Kaneko offers the embodiment of wherein the first processor generates checkout screen information and transmit the checkout screen information to the mobile terminal, the checkout screen information including the checkout information when the item requiring the age confirmation is not included in the list of items to be purchased and including the checkout information and an age confirmation message when the item requiring the age confirmation is included in the list of items to be purchased. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized the adaptation of displaying a message indicating an age confirmation requirement as disclosed by Kaneko to the checkout processes as taught by Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis and Glaser for the predicted result of improved checkout systems and methods. No additional findings are seen to be necessary. As per claim 3, the claimed subject matter that is met by Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis, Glaser and Kaneko includes: wherein the second processor displays the age confirmation screen when a specific code is included in the item identification information of an item listed in the list of items to be purchased (Yamashita: ¶ 0050 and Kaneko: ¶¶ 0046-0047). The motivation for combining the teachings of A Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis, Glaser and Kaneko are discussed in the rejection of claim 2, and are incorporated herein. As per claim 4, the claimed subject matter that is met by Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis, Glaser and Kaneko includes: the checkout machine stores, in the second memory, a list of items requiring the age confirmation which indicates item identification information of the items requiring the age confirmation (Kaneko: ¶¶ 0045 and 0144), and the second processor displays the age confirmation screen when item identification information of an item listed in the list of items to be purchased is included in the list of items requiring the age confirmation (Yamashita: ¶¶ 0050 and 0053-0058). The motivation for combining the teachings of Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis, Glaser and Kaneko are discussed in the rejection of claim 2, and are incorporated herein. As per claim 5, the claimed subject matter that is met by Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis, Glaser and Kaneko includes: wherein the age confirmation information indicates a clerk code applied on a possession of a clerk (Kaneko: ¶¶ 0246-0250) The motivation for combining the teachings of Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis, Glaser and Kaneko are discussed in the rejection of claim 2, and are incorporated herein. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aspholm in view of Yamashita, Bellis and Glaser as applied in claim 1, and further in view of United States Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0199702 A1 to Singh (“Singh”). As per claim 7, Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis and Glaser fail to specifically teach wherein the age confirmation information indicates biometric information of a customer. The Examiner provides Singh to teach and disclose this claimed feature. The claimed subject matter that is met by Singh includes: wherein the age confirmation information indicates biometric information of a customer (Singh: ¶ 0041) Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis and Glaser teach checkout systems and methods. Singh teaches a comparable checkout system and method that was improved in the same way as the claimed invention. Singh offers the embodiment of wherein the age confirmation information indicates biometric information of a customer. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized the adaptation of the biometric information as disclosed by Singh to the age information as taught by Aspholm, Yamashita, Bellis and Glaser for the predicted result of improved checkout systems and methods. No additional findings are seen to be necessary. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aspholm in view of Bellis and Glaser. As per claim 9, the claimed subject matter that is met by Aspholm includes: A server apparatus capable of communicating with a mobile terminal and a checkout machine, the server apparatus comprising (Aspholm: ¶¶ 0080 and 0086 and Fig. 1, 112 and Fig. 3): a memory storing instructions, and one or more processors configured to execute the instructions to (Aspholm: ¶¶ 0080 and 0086 and Fig. 1, 112 and Fig. 3); receive, from a mobile terminal, a store ID acquired by the mobile terminal, and customer identification information identifying a customer who uses the mobile terminal (Aspholm: ¶¶ 0082-0086); receive item identification information, which is scanned from a code attached to each item, from the mobile terminal (Aspholm: ¶ 0116 and Fig. 4); create a list of items to be purchased based on the item identification information received from the mobile terminal, send the list of items to be purchased to the mobile terminal (Aspholm: ¶¶ 0087 and 0117 and Fig. 1, 104A); and generate checkout information based on the list of items to be purchased upon receiving a checkout request from the mobile terminal, and transmit the checkout information to the mobile terminal (Aspholm: ¶¶ 0118-0121). Aspholm fails to specifically teach 1.) update the list of items to be purchased in response to a change in a quantity of the item, caused by an operation of a button for changing the quantity of the item, the button corresponding to the item on an items-to-be-purchased list screen displayed based on the list of items to be purchased at the mobile terminal, and 4.) wherein the checkout information causes the checkout machine to display an age confirmation screen and turn on a light to call a clerk, in a case where an item requiring an age confirmation is included in the list of items to be purchased. The Examiner provides Bellis to teach and disclose claimed feature 4. The claimed subject matter that is met by Bellis includes: wherein the checkout information causes the checkout machine to display an age confirmation screen and turn on a light to call a clerk, in a case where an item requiring an age confirmation is included in the list of items to be purchased (Bellis: ¶¶ 0055-0056). Aspholm teaches a checkout system and method. Bellis teaches a comparable checkout system and method that was improved in the same way as the claimed invention. Bellis offers the embodiment of wherein the checkout information causes the checkout machine to display an age confirmation screen and turn on a light to call a clerk, in a case where an item requiring an age confirmation is included in the list of items to be purchased. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized the adaptation of the age notification light as disclosed by Bellis to the checkout process as taught by Aspholm for the predicted result of improved checkout systems and methods. No additional findings are seen to be necessary. Aspholm and Bellis fail to specifically teach 1.) update the list of items to be purchased in response to a change in a quantity of the item, caused by an operation of a button for changing the quantity of the item, the button corresponding to the item on an items-to-be-purchased list screen displayed based on the list of items to be purchased at the mobile terminal. The Examiner provides Glaser to teach and disclose claimed feature 1. The claimed subject matter that is met by Glaser includes: update the list of items to be purchased in response to a change in a quantity of the item, caused by an operation of a button for changing the quantity of the item, the button corresponding to the item on an items-to-be-purchased list screen displayed based on the list of items to be purchased at the mobile terminal (Glaser: ¶ 0134 and Fig. 14) Aspholm and Bellis teach checkout systems and methods. Glaser teaches a comparable checkout system and method that was improved in the same way as the claimed invention. Glaser offers the embodiment of update the list of items to be purchased in response to a change in a quantity of the item, caused by an operation of a button for changing the quantity of the item, the button corresponding to the item on an items-to-be-purchased list screen displayed based on the list of items to be purchased at the mobile terminal. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized the adaptation updating the quantity of the item as disclosed by Glaser to the checkout processes as taught by Aspholm and Bellis for the predicted result of improved checkout systems and methods. No additional findings are seen to be necessary. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Hunter Wilder whose telephone number is (571)270-7948. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30AM-5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Florian Zeender can be reached on (571)272-6790. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A. Hunter Wilder/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 17 earlier events
Aug 07, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Dec 19, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
May 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705572
IMAGE-BASED INVENTORY SYSTEM
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699698
Product Logistics System for Autonomous Replacement
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12675785
SALES DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12657564
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-OPERATED AUTONOMOUS POINT-OF-SALE CABINET/REFRIGERATOR OPERATION SYSTEMS AND PROVISION OF RETRACTABLE VIDEO CAMERAS FOR THESE SYSTEMS (MACHINE LEARNING & COMPUTER VISION)
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651214
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING RECEIPT OF PACKAGE USING VEHICLE AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM FOR EXECUTING THE METHOD
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

8-9
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+58.5%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 558 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month