Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/767,471

DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE AND SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 08, 2022
Priority
Oct 18, 2019 — provisional 62/923,224 +5 more
Examiner
KOO, BENJAMIN K
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Amgen Inc.
OA Round
6 (Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
121 granted / 212 resolved
-12.9% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+49.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
258
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.4%
+9.4% vs TC avg
§102
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
§112
30.4%
-9.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 212 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Publication No. 2016/0151562 to MAGERS et al. (“Magers”) in view of U.S. Patent No. 5,431,509 to Anderson et al. (“Anderson”). Regarding claim 1, Magers teaches a drug delivery system for delivering a medicament (Figs. 12A & 12B), comprising a pump first housing (900) at least partially supporting and/or surrounding a fluid displacement assembly (Fig. 13b), the fluid displacement assembly comprising a positive displacement pump (942, [0226]), a pump second housing (1000) at least partially supporting and/or surrounding a drive component (1042, Fig. 13F) for driving medicament through the fluid displacement assembly, a fluid path assembly comprising an inlet (Fig. 12A, tube attached to 912) connected to the fluid displacement assembly and configured to deliver medicament to the fluid displacement assembly, the inlet comprising a flexible inlet tubing portion (as better seen as 52 in Fig. 1A, [0068]) connected to the fluid displacement assembly and extending external to the pump first housing, an outlet (Fig. 12A, tube attached to 914) connected to the fluid displacement assembly and configured to receive medicament from the fluid displacement assembly, the outlet comprising a flexible outlet tubing portion (as better seen as 54 in Fig. 1A) connected to the fluid displacement assembly and extending external to the pump first housing, wherein the fluid path assembly defines an enclosed flow path (923) through which the medicament flows, from the inlet to the outlet, without directly contacting the fluid displacement assembly (the medicament does not contact pump drive mechanism 942, which is defined above as the fluid displacement assembly), wherein the pump first housing and the pump second housing are removably coupled with each other (Figs. 12A/12B) at least by a slot (1074) and tab (974), but does not show the dovetail configuration. Anderson teaches a first housing and a second housing being removably coupled with each other at least by slots and tabs having a sliding dovetail configuration (column 8, lines 54 to column 9, lines 1-5). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have simply substituted one type of slot/tab configuration with another type of slot/tab configuration to obtain the predictable results of providing releasable attachment between two housings. Regarding claim 8, Magers teaches a drug delivery system for delivering a medicament (Fig. 1A), comprising a drug delivery device (Figs. 12A & 12B), a medicament container ([0068], IV bag) containing a medicament, the medicament container disposed external to the drug delivery device ([0068], Fig. 1A), a fluid path assembly comprising an inlet (Fig. 12A, tube attached to 912) comprising a flexible inlet tubing portion (as better seen as 52 in Fig. 1A, [0068]) connected to the drug delivery device and extending external to the drug delivery device, and an outlet (Fig. 12A, tube attached to 914) comprising a flexible outlet tubing portion (as better seen as 54 in Fig. 1A) connected to the drug delivery device and extending external to the drug delivery device, and the drug delivery device having a pump first housing (900) at least partially supporting and/or surrounding a fluid displacement assembly (Fig. 13b) connecting the inlet to the outlet, the fluid displacement assembly comprising a positive displacement pump (942, [0226]), a pump second housing (1000) at least partially supporting and/or surrounding a drive component (1042, Fig. 13F) for driving the medicament through the fluid displacement assembly, the inlet fluid path configured to receive the medicament from the medicament container and deliver the medicament to the fluid displacement assembly (medicament from the IV is sent to 912 to be driven through 900), the outlet fluid path configured to receive the medicament from the fluid displacement assembly and deliver the medicament to a patient (the outlet tubing portion delivers fluid to the patient), wherein the pump first housing and the pump second housing are removably coupled with each other (Figs. 12A/12B) at least by a slot (1074) and tab (974), wherein the fluid path assembly defines an enclosed flow path (923) through which the medicament flows, from the inlet to the outlet, without directly contacting the fluid displacement assembly (the medicament does not contact pump drive mechanism 942, which is defined above as the fluid displacement assembly), but does not show the dovetail configuration. Anderson teaches a first housing and a second housing being removably coupled with each other at least by slots and tabs having a sliding dovetail configuration (column 8, lines 54 to column 9, lines 1-5). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have simply substituted one type of slot/tab configuration with another type of slot/tab configuration to obtain the predictable results of providing releasable attachment between two pump housings. Claims 2-4, 6, 7, 55-57, and 59-62 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Magers in view of Anderson as applied to claims 1 and 8 above, and further in view of U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0073235 to Estes et al. (“Estes”). Regarding claim 2, Magers and Anderson teach the drug delivery device as in claim 1 as shown above, once modified by the slot/tab configuration of Anderson, Magers and Anderson teach the pump first housing and the pump second housing being removably coupled with each other by a second component (Anderson, Fig. 5, 32B/34) including the slots and tabs having the dovetail configuration, to resist movement along a second axis (as best shown in Magers Fig. 14D, axis 195, once modified by the dovetail slots/tabs, movement would be resisted in the vertical direction), but do not teach the first component. Estes teaches a pump first housing (200) and a pump second housing (220) being removably coupled with each other by a first component to resist movement ([0031], magnetic attachment) along a first axis (Estes Fig. 7, axis going in and out of 110). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have incorporated magnets to supplementally couple the pump first housing and pump second housing of Magers and Anderson, as taught by Estes, as magnets are a readily available type of attachment means that may be employed to releasably secure components of a pump device by, for example, retaining a pump housing structure within a cavity in conjunction with other connector devices such as mounting protrusions with mating cavities ([0031]). Once combined, the first axis (Magers, Fig. 14D, axis 197) and the second axis (axis 195) would be perpendicular to each other in the device of Magers, Anderson, and Estes. Regarding claim 3, Magers, Anderson, and Estes teach the drug delivery device as in claim 2 as shown above, and Magers further teaching the first axis (197, Fig. 14D) is parallel with an axis of the drive component (the pin of 1042 runs parallel to 197), and the second axis is generally perpendicular with the axis of the drive component (since the first and second axis are already perpendicular). Regarding claim 4, Magers, Anderson, and Estes teach the drug delivery device as in claim 2 as shown above, Estes previously teaching the first component being at least one magnet ([0031]). Regarding claim 6, Magers, Anderson, and Estes teach the drug delivery device as in claim 1 as shown above, Magers further teaching at least one isolation mount (seals 946) coupled with the first housing assembly and/or the fluid displacement assembly. Regarding claim 7, Magers, Anderson, and Estes teach the drug delivery device as in claim 1 as shown above, Magers further teaching the drug delivery device when the pump first housing and the pump second housing are removably coupled, at least a portion of the drive component (pin of 1042) is slidably received within at least a component (942) of the fluid displacement assembly. Regarding claim 55, Magers and Anderson teach the drug delivery system as in claim 8 as shown above, Anderson previously teaching the pump first housing and the pump second housing being removably coupled with each other along by a second component to resist movement along a second axis, the second component including the slots and table having the dovetail configuration (see above) but do not teach the first component. Estes teaches a pump first housing (200) and a pump second housing (220) being removably coupled with each other by a first component to resist movement ([0031], magnetic attachment) along a first axis (Estes Fig. 7, axis going in and out of 110). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have incorporated magnets to supplementally couple the pump first housing and pump second housing of Magers and Anderson, as magnets are a readily available type of attachment means that may be employed to releasably secure components of a pump device by, for example, retaining a pump housing structure within a cavity in conjunction with other connector devices such as mounting protrusions with mating cavities ([0031]). Once combined, the first axis (Magers, Fig. 14D, axis 197) and the second axis (axis 195) would be perpendicular to each other in the device of Magers, Anderson, and Estes. Regarding claim 56, Magers, Anderson, and Estes teach the drug delivery system as in claim 55 as shown above, Magers further teaching the first axis (197, Fig. 14D) is parallel with an axis of the drive component (the pin of 1042 runs parallel to 197) and the second axis is generally perpendicular with the axis of the drive component (since the first and second axis are already perpendicular). Regarding claim 57, Magers, Anderson, and Estes teach the drug delivery system as in claim 55 as shown above, Estes previously teaching the first component being at least one magnet (see above). Regarding claim 59, Magers and Anderson teach the drug delivery system as in claim 8 as shown above, Magers further teaching at least one isolation mount (seals 946) coupled with the first housing assembly and/or the fluid displacement assembly. Regarding claim 60, Magers and Anderson teach the drug delivery system as in claim 8 as shown above, Magers further teaching that when the pump first housing and the pump second housing are removably coupled, at least a portion of the drive component (pin of 1042) is slidably received within at least a component (942) of the fluid displacement assembly. Regarding claim 61, Magers, Anderson, and Estes teach the drug delivery device as in claim 2 as shown above, Magers further teaching the flexible inlet tubing portion and the flexible outlet tubing portion are parallel to the second axis (as previously described in the rejection of claim 2, the second axis 195 runs vertically which is parallel to the inlet and outlet tubing as shown in Fig. 14B). Regarding claim 62, Magers, Anderson, and Estes teach the drug delivery system as in claim 55 as shown above, Magers further teaching the flexible inlet tubing portion and the flexible outlet tubing portion are parallel to the second axis (as previously described in the rejection of claim 55, the second axis 195 runs vertically which is parallel to the inlet and outlet tubing as shown in Fig. 14B). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments and amendments with respect to the art rejections have been fully considered and are not persuasive. Claims 1 and 8 have been amended to recite, inter alia, that the fluid path assembly defines an enclosed flow path through which the medicament flows without directly contacting the fluid displacement assembly. [emphasis added] Applicant argues that the fluid displacement assembly 945 of Magers directly contacts the medicament at 923 as shown in Fig. 13E. As shown above, the fluid displacement assembly of claims 1 and 8 has now been mapped as pump drive mechanism 942 of Magers which is operatively coupled to piston 945, and element 942 does not directly contact the medicament. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN KOO whose telephone number is (703)756-1749. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Tsai can be reached at (571) 270-5246. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /B.K./Examiner, Art Unit 3783 /THEODORE J STIGELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 7 earlier events
Sep 05, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 18, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 05, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12728206
AUTO-INJECTOR
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12714839
TECHNOLOGIES FOR NEEDLES WITH MICROCHANNELS
4y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12697469
IV CATHETER INSERTION GUIDE
4y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12685816
BILATERAL-DRIVEN PATCH-TYPE DRUG INFUSION DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12653955
ANTI-ROTATION CARTRIDGE PIN
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+49.7%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 212 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month