Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/768,878

CUSTOMIZABLE DELIMINATED TEXT COMPRESSION FRAMEWORK

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 14, 2022
Priority
Oct 18, 2019 — provisional 62/923,113 +2 more
Examiner
PHAN, TUANKHANH D
Art Unit
2154
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
460 granted / 582 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
604
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
76.4%
+36.4% vs TC avg
§102
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
§112
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 582 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The Amendment, filed on 3/13/2026, has been entered and acknowledged by the Examiner. Claims 21-35 are pending. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 21-32 have been considered and they are persuasive; however, rejection of claims 33-35 is sustained since no amendment nor argument based on the amendment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 33-35 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Chandrasekar (EP2577873B 1) in view of JP5280425 (hereinafter “425”), and further in view of Hiroaki (JP 2005018672). Regarding claim 33, Chandrasekar and Hiroaki disclose a system for compressing data, comprising: a schema manager configured to allow users to create, select or auto-generate a compression schema customized to a format of an input delimited text file, which compression schema comprises a table defining a number of ranges of line number and a number of ranges of columns numbers, enabling a specification of a covering with variable-sized rectangles of data in the an input delimited text file (¶ [0030]); a parser configured to parse the data of the input delimited text file into a plurality of blocks based on the rectangle definitions in the compression schema (¶ [0059], parsing/extracting); and a compression manager configured to compress the plurality of data units in the plurality of data blocks using different compression algorithms indicated by the compression instructions in the compression schema (¶¶ [0030]-[0031], a determination of a row-storage format for storing said columns. The means for analyzing includes means for determining whether to store column values in column-major or row-major format, and means for determining whether to use a compression technique to compress said column values). Chandrasekar does not explicitly disclose “variable-size rectangle”; however, 425 and Hiroaki disclose “variable size rectangle” (middle page 3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate 425 into Chandrasekar to enable to select specified characters for compression. Hiroaki further discloses two or more different compression algorithms (¶ [0080], The schema update block 119 accepts user tag name batch change and node batch delete requests, and changes the schema tree. The schema tree 102 changed by the schema compression block 110 is converted into the compression schema 103, and is combined with the compressed data by the BXML combination block 114 to output a BXML document 105). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate Hiroaki into Chandrasekar and 425 to allow different compressions in an XML file. Regarding claim 34, Chandrasekar in view of 425 and Hiroaki disclose the system of claim 33, wherein the schema manager is to create a new compression schema or determine the best-matching one from a plurality of compression schemas based on information input by a user, wherein each of the plurality of compression schemas is customized for respective one of a plurality of different formats of delimited text files (¶ [0003]). Regarding claim 35, Chandrasekar in view of 425 and Hiroaki disclose the system of claim 33, wherein the compression manager is to obtain codes of the compression algorithms from the user or a compressor repository, instantiate the compressors for each data block by allocating computational resources and memory, and running and monitoring the compression of the data units (¶ [0065]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 21-32 are allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUANKHANH D PHAN whose telephone number is (571)270-3047. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri, 10:00am-18:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Boris Gorney can be reached on 571-270-5626. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 or 571-272-1000. /TUANKHANH D PHAN/ Examiner, Art Unit 2154
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Feb 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 23, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 04, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12664188
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR QUESTION-ANSWERING USING A DATABASE CONSIST OF QUERY VECTORS
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12664208
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROVIDING A SECURE AUTOMATED ASSISTANT
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12640234
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SUBSAMPLING OF CELLS FROM SINGLE-CELL GENOMICS DATASET
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12618845
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR PROTEIN SEQUENCING
1y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12536215
AUTOMATED GENERATION OF GOVERNING LABEL RECOMMENDATIONS
1y 8m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+13.0%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 582 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month