Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 17/769,870

ELECTROLYTE FOR LITHIUM-SULFUR BATTERY, AND LITHIUM-SULFUR BATTERY INCLUDING SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 18, 2022
Priority
Mar 27, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0037351 +2 more
Examiner
MARTIN, ANGELA J
Art Unit
1727
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
35%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
592 granted / 883 resolved
+2.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -32% lift
Without
With
+-31.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 12m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
953
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
66.4%
+26.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 883 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The Applicant has amended independent claim 1; and canceled claims 2, 5, 12 ; and added new claim 17. The pending claims are claims 1, 3, 4, 6-11, 13-17. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3, 4, 6-11, 13-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang et al., WO 2018216866, in view of Eitouni et al., US 2017/0033400. Regarding claim 1, Yang et al., teaches an electrolyte (0020) for a lithium-sulfur battery (abstract) comprising a lithium salt (0020-0021); and a non-aqueous organic solvent (0020; 0038); containing an additive (0020; 0030), an ether-based compound (0081-0084) and a heterocyclic compound (0025; 0033; 0035; 0090), the heterocyclic compound including one or more double bonds (0054), and bonds (0039; 0048; 0070), wherein the additive comprises an alkyl vinyl ether compound (0047; 0052-0053; 0068). Yang et al., teaches an ether in amount of up to 15% by wt based on a total of 100% by wt of electrolyte for lithium sulfur battery (0038-0039). Yang et al., does not teach a compound represented by Formula 1: [Formula 1] PNG media_image1.png 17 118 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein R is an alkyl group a heterocyclic compound, the heterocyclic compound including one or more double having 1 to 10 carbon atoms. However, Eitouni et al., teaches Formula 1: [Formula 1] PNG media_image1.png 17 118 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein R is an alkyl group a heterocyclic compound, the heterocyclic compound including one or more double having 1 to 10 carbon atoms, wherein “What is really needed is a way to take full advantage of the high lithium capacity of sulfur-containing cathode materials coupled with lithium metal electrodes to make stable, long life cycle electrochemical cells.” (0007).Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to employ the general Formula I in Eitouni, which is a basic ether structure. Regarding claim 3, Yang et al., teaches wherein the alkyl vinyl ether compound comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of ether (0081-0084). Regarding claim 4, Yang et al., teaches wherein the alkyl vinyl ether compound has the effect of improving the efficiency and stability of the negative electrode (0090; 0104-0105) comprised in the lithium-sulfur battery (0018; 0020). Regarding claim 6, Yang et al., teaches wherein the ether-based compound comprises a linear ether compound (0082-0083). Regarding 7, Yang et al., teaches wherein the linear ether compound (0082-0083) comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of butyl vinyl ether (0081; 0082). Regarding claim 8, Yang et al., teaches wherein the heterocyclic compound includes at least one hetero atom selected from the group consisting of a sulfur atom (0057). Regarding claim 9, Yang et al., teaches wherein the heterocyclic compound comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of furan (0084). Regarding claim 10, Yang et al., does not teach wherein the non- aqueous organic solvent comprises the ether-based compound and the heterocyclic compound in a volume ratio of 95:5 to 5:95. However, "[W]here the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation." In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ 233, 235 (CCPA 1955). Regarding claim 11, Yang et al., teaches wherein the lithium salt (0020-0022) comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of LiBF4, LiPF6 (0079). Regarding claim 13, Yang et al., teaches a lithium-sulfur battery (abstract; 0018) comprising a positive electrode comprising a positive electrode active material (0096); a negative electrode comprising a negative electrode active material (0104); and an electrolyte (0074) according to claim 1. Regarding claim 14, Yang et al., teaches wherein the positive electrode active material comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of elemental sulfur (0095) and a sulfur compound (0004; 0095-0096). Regarding claim 15, Yang et al., teaches wherein the positive electrode active material comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of organic sulfur compound (0095). Regarding claim 16, Yang et al., teaches wherein the negative electrode active material (0104) comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of lithium metal (0101; 0104) and lithium alloy (0104). Regarding claim 17, Yang et al., teaches an electrolyte for a lithium-sulfur battery (abstract) comprising: a lithium salt (0020; 0038; 0079); and a non-aqueous organic solvent (0081) containing an additive in the electrolyte (0020; 0030; 0038), wherein the additive comprises an alkyl vinyl ether compound (0081-0084), wherein the alkyl vinyl ether compound (0081-0084; 0102). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 4/7/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The Applicant argues that “the additive is not a polymer.” However, “the additive is not a polymer” is not recited in the claim . The Applicant argues that “the cited reference does not teach or suggest an additive as recited in the claims.” However, the prior art teaches an additive comprising an alkyl chain (0025), which can be employed in the electrolyte as an additive. Additionally, a new reference, Yang et al., WO 2018216866, is now employed as the primary reference in this rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANGELA J MARTIN whose telephone number is (571)272-1288. The examiner can normally be reached 7am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barbara Gilliam can be reached at 571-272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ANGELA J. MARTIN Examiner Art Unit 1727 /ANGELA J MARTIN/Examiner, Art Unit 1727 /BARBARA L GILLIAM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Feb 14, 2025
Response Filed
May 29, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 29, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 12, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12671078
Rechargeable Alkaline Manganese Dioxide-Zinc Bipolar Batteries
7y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671076
Method for Preparing Positive Electrode Active Material for Secondary Battery
5y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12631565
Secondary Battery Having Lead Film Including Luminous Material and Method of Inspecting Defects of Secondary Battery
6y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633534
STABLE CATHODE MATERIALS
3y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626926
ELECTRODE WITH FLAME RETARDANT ADDITIVES AND METHOD AND SYSTEMS FOR PREPARATION AND USE
5y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
35%
With Interview (-31.9%)
3y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 883 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month