Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/770,678

LASER COOLING OF SILICA GLASS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 21, 2022
Priority
Oct 22, 2019 — provisional 62/924,479 +1 more
Examiner
KING, JOSHUA
Art Unit
2828
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Unm Rainforest Innovations
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allowance Rate
473 granted / 732 resolved
-3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
765
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
87.1%
+47.1% vs TC avg
§102
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 732 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 04/28/2026 has been entered. Allowable Subject Matter The indicated allowability of the claims is withdrawn in view of the newly discovered reference(s) to Wang (“Determination of External Quantum Efficiency in Semiconductors Using Pulsed Power-Dependent Photoluminescence”). Rejections based on the newly cited reference(s) follow. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/28/2026 was filed with a Request for Continued Examination. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1 and 2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mobini et al. (“Spectroscopic Investigation of Yb-Doped Silica Glass for Solid-State Optical Refrigeration”), hereafter Mobini, in view of Wang (“Determination of External Quantum Efficiency in Semiconductors Using Pulsed Power-Dependent Photoluminescence”), hereafter Wang. Regarding claim 1, Mobini discloses a device (Abstract) comprising: a ytterbium-doped silica glass that is laser cooled using anti-Stokes fluorescence (Abstract) and doped with one or more codopants (pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph) the one or more codopants comprise Aluminum (Al), fluorine (F), phosphorus (P), cerium (Ce), germanium (Ge), or tin (Sn) (pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph discloses Aluminum) and with a ytterbium density (pg. 4 col. 1 ll 3-4) selected to provide suppression of ytterbium-ytterbium interactions in ytterbium ion clustering and mitigation of ytterbium impurity interactions (paragraph bridging pg. 2 col. 2 and pg. 3 col. 1) and the ytterbium -doped silica glass has an internal quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling (pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph). Mobini does not explicitly disclose ytterbium density of up to including 4 wt% or an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling. However, Mobini discloses balancing ytterbium density to balance cooling efficiency and quenching concentration (pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph to pg. 5 col. 2 ll. 2) and to prevent ytterbium-ytterbium interactions in ytterbium ion clustering and mitigation of ytterbium impurity interactions that lower internal quantum efficiency (paragraph bridging pg. 2 col. 2 and pg. 3 col. 1). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Mobini with ytterbium density of up to including 4 wt%, since Mobini discloses optimizing ytterbium density to balance cooling efficiency and quenching concentration and to prevent ytterbium-ytterbium interactions in ytterbium ion clustering and mitigation of ytterbium impurity interactions that lower internal quantum efficiency and since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). As modified, Mobini still does not disclose an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling. However, Wang discloses high external quantum efficiency is essential for achieving net cooling in devices (Abstract). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify Mobini with an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling, since Wang discloses high external quantum efficiency is essential for achieving net cooling in devices and since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Regarding claim 2, Mobini further discloses the ytterbium -doped silica glass is laser cooled at a wavelength of about 1020 nm to about 1100 nm (Fig. 4 pg. 4 col. 1 discloses a wavelength of 1030nm). Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mobini in view of Wang, as applied claim Deki et al. (JP200495839), hereafter Deki. Regarding claim 5, Mobini in view of Wang do not explicitly disclose the codopants comprise a first group of Al, P, Ge, and Sn, a second group of Al, F, Ge, and Sn, or a third group of Al, F, Ce, Ge, and Sn. However, Deki discloses the codopants include one or more of aluminum (Al), boron (B), gallium (Ga), indium (In), germanium (Ge), tin (Sn), bismuth (Bi), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), yttrium (Yb), oxides thereof ([0042]-[0043]). An advantage is to suppress clustering. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Mobini with the codopants comprise a first group of Al, P, Ge, and Sn, a second group of Al, F, Ge, and Sn, or a third group of Al, F, Ce, Ge, and Sn, since Deki discloses the codopants include one or more of aluminum (Al), boron (B), gallium (Ga), indium (In), germanium (Ge), tin (Sn), bismuth (Bi), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), yttrium (Yb), oxides thereof in order to suppress clustering, it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice (In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416), and the Court has held that choosing from a finite number of identified, predictable solutions, with a reasonable expectation of success requires only ordinary skill in the art1 (KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 415-421, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395-97 (2007)). Claims 6-8, 13, 16, 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mobini in view of Epstein (US5447032), hereafter Epstein, in further view of Wang. Regarding claim 6, Mobini discloses a method for laser cooling rare earth doped silica glass using anti-Stokes fluorescence (Abstract; Fig. 4), the method comprising: providing radiation from a laser at an appropriate wavelength to a first surface (Fig. 4; pg. 4 col. 1) and through a body of the rare earth doped silica glass (Abstract), wherein the rare earth doped silica glass is doped with one or more codopants (Abstract; pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph) wherein the one or more codopants comprise Aluminum (Al), fluorine (F), phosphorus (P), cerium (Ce), germanium (Ge), or tin (Sn) (pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph discloses Aluminum), wherein the one or more rare earth elements comprise cerium (Ce), dysprosium (Dy), erbium (Er), europium (Eu), gadolinium (Gd), holmium (Ho), lanthanum (La), lutetium (Lu), neodymium (Nd), praseodymium (Pr), promethium (Pm), samarium (Sm), scandium (Sc), terbium (Tb), thulium (Tm), ytterbium (Yb) with a ytterbium density (pg. 4 col. 1 ll 3-4) selected to provide suppression of ytterbium-ytterbium interactions in ytterbium ion clustering and mitigation of ytterbium impurity interactions (paragraph bridging pg. 2 col. 2 and pg. 3 col. 1), or yttrium (Y) (Abstract) and the ytterbium -doped silica glass has an internal quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling (pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph). Mobini does not explicitly disclose the laser is a continuous wave laser, the ytterbium density of up to including 4 wt%, or an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling. However, Mobini discloses balancing ytterbium density to balance cooling efficiency and quenching concentration (pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph to pg. 5 col. 2 ll. 2) and to prevent ytterbium-ytterbium interactions in ytterbium ion clustering and mitigation of ytterbium impurity interactions that lower internal quantum efficiency (paragraph bridging pg. 2 col. 2 and pg. 3 col. 1). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Mobini with ytterbium density of up to including 4 wt%, since Mobini discloses optimizing ytterbium density to balance cooling efficiency and quenching concentration and to prevent ytterbium-ytterbium interactions in ytterbium ion clustering and mitigation of ytterbium impurity interactions that lower internal quantum efficiency and since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Mobini still does not explicitly disclose the laser is a continuous wave laser or an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling. However, Epstein discloses the laser is a continuous wave laser (col. 6 ll. 58-60; col. 8 ll. 40-41). An advantage, as is known in the art, is to use a single device to determine the optimal wavelength for pumping the device to cause cooling. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Mobini with the laser is a continuous wave laser as disclosed by Epstein in order to use a single device to determine the optimal wavelength for pumping the device to cause cooling. Mobini in view of Epstein do not explicitly disclose or an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling. However, Wang discloses high external quantum efficiency is essential for achieving net cooling in devices (Abstract). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify Mobini with an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling, since Wang discloses high external quantum efficiency is essential for achieving net cooling in devices and since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Regarding claim 7, Mobini further discloses changing a wavelength from a first wavelength to a second wavelength; monitoring the rare earth doped silica glass using a thermally sensitive device during the changing and determining a third wavelength between the first wavelength and the second wavelength where the rare earth doped silica glass is maximumly or near maximumly cooled based on the monitoring (pg. 4 col. 1; Fig. 4). Mobini does not explicitly disclose the laser is a continuous wave laser and the wavelength is changed by tuning the laser. However, Epstein discloses the laser is a continuous wave laser and the wavelength is changed by tuning the laser (col. 6 ll. 58-60; col. 8 ll. 40-41). An advantage, as is known in the art, is to use a single device to determine the optimal wavelength for pumping the device to cause cooling. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Mobini with the laser is a continuous wave laser and the wavelength is changed by tuning the laser as disclosed by Epstein in order to use a single device to determine the optimal wavelength for pumping the device to cause cooling. Regarding claim 8, Mobini further discloses the thermally sensitive device comprises a thermal camera or a thermometer or other methods of the temperature measurement (pg. 4 col 1 discloses measuring the temperature that at least constitutes “other methods”). Regarding claim 13, Mobini discloses a method for laser cooling rare earth doped silica glass using anti-Stokes fluorescence (Abstract; Fig. 4), the method comprising: providing radiation from a laser to a first surface (Fig. 4; pg. 4 col. 1) and through a body of the rare earth doped and codoped with one or more codopants silica glass (Abstract; pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph) wherein the one or more codopants comprise Aluminum (Al), fluorine (F), phosphorus (P), cerium (Ce), germanium (Ge), or tin (Sn) (pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph discloses Aluminum), wherein the one or more rare earth elements comprise cerium (Ce), dysprosium (Dy), erbium (Er), europium (Eu), gadolinium (Gd), holmium (Ho), lanthanum (La), lutetium (Lu), neodymium (Nd), praseodymium (Pr), promethium (Pm), samarium (Sm), scandium (Sc), terbium (Tb), thulium (Tm), ytterbium (Yb) with a ytterbium density (pg. 4 col. 1 ll 3-4) selected to provide suppression of ytterbium-ytterbium interactions in ytterbium ion clustering and mitigation of ytterbium impurity interactions (paragraph bridging pg. 2 col. 2 and pg. 3 col. 1), or yttrium (Y) (Abstract); changing the laser from a first wavelength to a second wavelength (pg. 4 col. 1; Fig. 4); monitoring the rare earth doped silica glass using a thermally sensitive device during the changing (pg. 4 col. 1; Fig. 4); and determining a third wavelength between the first wavelength and the second wavelength where the rare earth doped silica glass is maximumly or near maximumly cooled based on the monitoring (pg. 4 col. 1; Fig. 4) and the ytterbium -doped silica glass has an internal quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling (pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph). Mobini does not explicitly disclose ytterbium density of up to including 4 wt%, the wavelength is changed by tuning the laser, or an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling. However, Mobini discloses balancing ytterbium density to balance cooling efficiency and quenching concentration (pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph to pg. 5 col. 2 ll. 2) and to prevent ytterbium-ytterbium interactions in ytterbium ion clustering and mitigation of ytterbium impurity interactions that lower internal quantum efficiency (paragraph bridging pg. 2 col. 2 and pg. 3 col. 1). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Mobini with ytterbium density of up to including 4 wt%, since Mobini discloses optimizing ytterbium density to balance cooling efficiency and quenching concentration and to prevent ytterbium-ytterbium interactions in ytterbium ion clustering and mitigation of ytterbium impurity interactions that lower internal quantum efficiency and since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Mobini still does not explicitly disclose the wavelength is changed by tuning the laser or the one or an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling. However, Epstein discloses the laser is a continuous wave laser and the wavelength is changed by tuning the laser (col. 6 ll. 58-60; col. 8 ll. 40-41). An advantage, as is known in the art, is to use a single device to determine the optimal wavelength for pumping the device to cause cooling. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Mobini with the wavelength is changed by tuning the laser as disclosed by Epstein in order to use a single device to determine the optimal wavelength for pumping the device to cause cooling. Mobini in view of Epstein do not explicitly disclose or an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling. However, Wang discloses high external quantum efficiency is essential for achieving net cooling in devices (Abstract). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify Mobini with an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling, since Wang discloses high external quantum efficiency is essential for achieving net cooling in devices and since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Regarding claim 16, Mobini further discloses the first wavelength is around 1020 nm and the second wavelength is around 1100 nm (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 18, Epstein further discloses redirecting the radiation to a second surface of the material (Fig. 6 element 28b). Regarding claim 19, Epstein further discloses the material is arranged in a vacuum chamber (col. 2 ll. 34-35). Mobini in view of Epstein do not explicitly disclose the chamber is reduced to a pressure of about 10-6 torr. However, the Office takes Official Notice that the chamber is reduced to a pressure of about 10-6 torr is well known in the art. An advantage is to achieve the necessary vacuum to prevent delirious effects caused by an atmosphere in the cell based on the intended use. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Mobini in view of Epstein in further view of Deki with the chamber is reduced to a pressure of about 10-6 torr as is known in the art in order to achieve the necessary vacuum to prevent delirious effects caused by an atmosphere in the cell based on the intended use and since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Regarding claim 20, Epstein further discloses the material is arranged in a multiple-pass or long path absorption cell (Fig. 6; col. 8 ll. 1-6). An advantage is to increase the pathlength of the excitation radiation (col. 8 ll. 1-6). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify Mobini in view of Epstein in further view of Deki with the material is arranged in a multiple-pass or long path absorption cell as disclosed by Epstein in order to increase the pathlength of the excitation radiation. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mobini in view of Epstein in further view of Wang, as applied to claim 6, in further view of Deki. Regarding claim 12, Mobini in view of Epstein in further view of Wang do not explicitly disclose the codopants comprise a first group of Al, P, Ge, and Sn, a second group of Al, F, Ge, and Sn, or a third group of Al, F, Ce, Ge, and Sn. However, Deki discloses the codopants include one or more of aluminum (Al), boron (B), gallium (Ga), indium (In), germanium (Ge), tin (Sn), bismuth (Bi), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), yttrium (Yb), oxides thereof ([0042]-[0043]). An advantage is to suppress clustering. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify Mobini in view of Epstein in further view of Wang with the codopants comprise a first group of Al, P, Ge, and Sn, a second group of Al, F, Ge, and Sn, or a third group of Al, F, Ce, Ge, and Sn, since Deki discloses the codopants include one or more of aluminum (Al), boron (B), gallium (Ga), indium (In), germanium (Ge), tin (Sn), bismuth (Bi), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), yttrium (Yb), oxides thereof in order to suppress clustering, it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice (In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416), and the Court has held that choosing from a finite number of identified, predictable solutions, with a reasonable expectation of success requires only ordinary skill in the art2 (KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 415-421, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395-97 (2007)). Claims 22, 26, 28, and 29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mobini in view of Epstein in further view of Hehlen (“Solid-State Optical Refrigeration”)3, hereafter Hehlen, in further view of Wang. Regarding claim 22, Mobini discloses a system for laser cooling rare earth doped silica glass using anti-Stokes fluorescence (Title; Abstract), the system comprising: a rare earth doped and codoped with one or more codopants silica glass (Abstract; pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph) wherein the one or more codopants comprise Aluminum (Al), fluorine (F), phosphorus (P), cerium (Ce), germanium (Ge), or tin (Sn) (pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph discloses Aluminum), wherein the rare earth doped silica glass is doped with one or more codopants (Abstract; pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph), wherein the one or more rare earth elements comprise cerium (Ce), dysprosium (Dy), erbium (Er), europium (Eu), gadolinium (Gd), holmium (Ho), lanthanum (La), lutetium (Lu), neodymium (Nd), praseodymium (Pr), promethium (Pm), samarium (Sm), scandium (Sc), terbium (Tb), thulium (Tm), ytterbium (Yb) with a ytterbium density (pg. 4 col. 1 ll 3-4) selected to provide suppression of ytterbium-ytterbium interactions in ytterbium ion clustering and mitigation of ytterbium impurity interactions (paragraph bridging pg. 2 col. 2 and pg. 3 col. 1), or yttrium (Y) (Abstract); a laser that provides radiation to a first surface and through a body of the rare earth doped silica glass (Fig. 4; pg. 4 col. 1), wherein the wavelength is changed from a first wavelength to a second wavelength (Fig. 4); measuring the temperature of the rare earth doped silica glass as the wavelength is changed and determines a third wavelength between the first wavelength (pg. 4 col. 1) and the second wavelength where the rare earth doped silica glass is maximumly or near maximumly cooled (Fig. 4) and the ytterbium -doped silica glass has an internal quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling (pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph). Mobini does not explicitly disclose tuning the laser to change the wavelength, a thermally sensitive device that captures images, the ytterbium density of up to including 4 wt%, or an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling. However, Mobini discloses balancing ytterbium density to balance cooling efficiency and quenching concentration (pg. 5 col. 1 first full paragraph to pg. 5 col. 2 ll. 2) and to prevent ytterbium-ytterbium interactions in ytterbium ion clustering and mitigation of ytterbium impurity interactions that lower internal quantum efficiency (paragraph bridging pg. 2 col. 2 and pg. 3 col. 1). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Mobini with ytterbium density of up to including 4 wt%, since Mobini discloses optimizing ytterbium density to balance cooling efficiency and quenching concentration and to prevent ytterbium-ytterbium interactions in ytterbium ion clustering and mitigation of ytterbium impurity interactions that lower internal quantum efficiency and since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Mobini still does not explicitly disclose tuning the laser to change the wavelength, a thermally sensitive device that captures images, or an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling. However, Epstein discloses tuning the laser to change the wavelength (col. 6 ll. 58-60; col. 8 ll. 40-41). An advantage, as is known in the art, is to use a single device to determine the optimal wavelength for pumping the device to cause cooling. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Mobini with the wavelength is changed by tuning the laser as disclosed by Epstein in order to use a single device to determine the optimal wavelength for pumping the device to cause cooling. Mobini in view of Epstein do not explicitly disclose a thermally sensitive device that captures images or an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling. However, Hehlen discloses measuring the temperature by a thermally sensitive device that captures images (pg. 233 paragraph 1). An advantage, as is known in the art, is to remotely detect the temperature. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify Mobini in view of Epstein with measuring the temperature by a thermally sensitive device that captures images as disclosed by Hehlen in order to remotely detect the temperature. Mobini in view of Epstein in further view of Hehlen do not explicitly disclose an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling. However, Wang discloses high external quantum efficiency is essential for achieving net cooling in devices (Abstract). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify Mobini in view of Epstein in further view of Hehlen with an external quantum efficiency of at least 97% to allow for laser cooling, since Wang discloses high external quantum efficiency is essential for achieving net cooling in devices and since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Regarding claim 26, Mobini further discloses the first wavelength is around 1020 nm and the second wavelength is around 1100 nm (Fig. 4). Regarding claim 28, Epstein further discloses the material is arranged in a vacuum chamber (col. 2 ll. 34-35). Mobini in view of Epstein in further view of Hehlen do not explicitly disclose the chamber is reduced to a pressure of about 10-6 torr. However, the Office takes Official Notice that the chamber is reduced to a pressure of about 10-6 torr is well known in the art. An advantage is to achieve the necessary vacuum to prevent delirious effects caused by an atmosphere in the cell based on the intended use. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Mobini in view of Epstein in further view of Hehlen in further view of Deki with the chamber is reduced to a pressure of about 10-6 torr as is known in the art in order to achieve the necessary vacuum to prevent delirious effects caused by an atmosphere in the cell based on the intended use and since it has been held that discovering an optimum value of a result effective variable involves only routine skill in the art. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980). Regarding claim 29, Epstein further discloses the material is arranged in a multiple-pass or long path absorption cell (Fig. 6; col. 8 ll. 1-6). An advantage is to increase the pathlength of the excitation radiation (col. 8 ll. 1-6). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify Mobini in view of Epstein in further view of Hehlen in further view of Deki with the material is arranged in a multiple-pass or long path absorption cell as disclosed by Epstein in order to increase the pathlength of the excitation radiation. Conclusion Relevant art for determining the teaching of Mobini, but does not constitute prior art: “Laser Cooling of Ytterbium-Doped Silica Glass” discloses “The non-radiative decay channels related to the concentration quenching are mainly due to the dipole–dipole interactions between Yb ions and impurities, which include OH−, transition metals, and undesirable RE ions, as well as Yb–Yb interactions in Yb ion clusters. Developing a high-purity Yb-doped silica glass is therefore required to avoid the interactions between the Yb ions and impurities16.” 16. Mobini, E., Peysokhan, M., Abaie, B., Hehlen, M. P. & Mafi, A. Spectroscopic investigation of Yb-doped silica glass for solid-state optical refrigeration. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 014066 (2019). The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached Notice of References Cited. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSHUA KING whose telephone number is (571)270-1441. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 10am-5pm MT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Min Sun Harvey can be reached on (571) 272-1835. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Joshua King/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2828 06/09/2026 1 Mobini discloses clustering to be problematic and suggest reducing the problem by incorporating aluminum with ytterbium. Deki discloses a similar issue with clustering and suggests using multiple codopants including Al, P, Ge, and Sn in combinations to reduce clustering. Finally, a person of ordinary skill in the art would have a reasonable expectation of success based on the limited number of elements suggested by Deki and because the problem of clustering is well recognized. 2 Mobini discloses clustering to be problematic and suggest reducing the problem by incorporating aluminum with ytterbium. Deki discloses a similar issue with clustering and suggests using multiple codopants including Al, P, Ge, and Sn in combinations to reduce clustering. Finally, a person of ordinary skill in the art would have a reasonable expectation of success based on the limited number of elements suggested by Deki and because the problem of clustering is well recognized. 3 Cite No. 3 in the IDS filed 04/21/2022.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 8 earlier events
Jun 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 16, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 28, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676677
Light Emission Assembly and an Optical Module
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676454
Tunable Laser Diode
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671226
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665372
LASER PROCESSING APPARATUS
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12644984
OPTICAL ISOLATION APPARATUS
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.0%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 732 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month