DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Objections
Claims 16, 20 – 24 and 26 – 27 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 16 contains the limitation “and the orientation property of the screen of each smartwatch includes identifying a broadcast direction of the main screen (Emphasis Added).” The term “the main screen” to have antecedent basis in the instant claim language. The examiner assumes this to be a typo and that the applicant intended to claim “the screen” and the claim will be treated as such. Appropriate correction is required.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claims 16, 20 – 24 and 26 – 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ishii (U.S. PG Pub 2005/0174302) in view of Goel et al. (U.S. PG Pub 2014/0313103) in view of Vinmani et al. (U.S. PG Pub 2016/0366267).
Regarding Claim 16, Ishii teaches a method for managing a display interface (Figures 10 - 12, Elements 10-1 - 10-3. Paragraph 100) formed of a plurality of display screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) of smartwatches (Figure 1, Element 10. Paragraph 72) worn on parts of the body of users, which parts are capable of moving or are moving, said watches (Figure 1, Element 10. Paragraph 72) being capable of moving or moving (Paragraph 101) with respect to one another and being located in proximity of one another, the method comprising the following steps:
estimating at least one broadcasting property (Figure 3, Elements 17 and 18. Paragraph 78) of each display screen of the plurality of display screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) in said display interface (Figures 10 - 12, Elements 10-1 - 10-3. Paragraph 100) which they form together;
managing the display of a visual message (Figures 10 - 12, Element Apple. Paragraph 109) on the display interface (Figures 10 - 12, Elements 10-1 - 10-3. Paragraph 100) comprising a substep of generating portions (Seen in Figure 12) of said visual message (Figures 10 - 12, Element Apple. Paragraph 109) intended to be displayed on the screen of each smartwatch (Figure 1, Element 10. Paragraph 72) worn by a plurality of different users (Figure 17. Paragraph 168), the portions are generated as a function of measurement data (Paragraph 101) relating to the at least one broadcasting property (Figure 3, Elements 17 and 18. Paragraph 78), the at least one broadcasting property (Figure 3, Elements 17 and 18. Paragraph 78) includes each of a location property (Paragraphs 105 - 107) and an orientation property (Paragraph 101), the location property (Paragraphs 105 - 107) being a location of each watch relative to the other smartwatches (Figure 1, Element 10. Paragraph 72) worn by a plurality of different users (Figure 17. Paragraph 168), the location property (Paragraphs 105 - 107) including a distance (Paragraph 175) between a plurality of screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) of the plurality of display screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) worn by a plurality of different users (Figure 17. Paragraph 168), the screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) of which form the display interface (Figures 10 - 12, Elements 10-1 - 10-3. Paragraph 100) and the orientation property (Paragraph 101) of the screen of each smartwatch (Figure 1, Element 10. Paragraph 72) includes identifying a broadcast direction of the screen;
identifying a plurality of screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) to be activated (Element not labeled, but is the display device within the predetermined distance. Paragraphs 174 – 176) and one or more screens of the plurality of screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) to be in a second mode (Element not labeled, but is the display device not within the predetermined distance. Paragraphs 174 – 176), the identifying based on each of the distance (Element predetermined distance. Paragraphs 174 – 176) between the plurality of screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) and the orientation property (Paragraph 101) of each screen; and
broadcasting portions (Seen in Figure 12) of said message on each activated screen of the plurality of display screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) constituting this display interface (Figures 10 - 12, Elements 10-1 - 10-3. Paragraph 100);
wherein the display management step comprises a substep of designing a mapping relating to the position of all the smartwatches (Figure 1, Element 10. Paragraph 72) of the activated screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) of the plurality of display screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) constituting and forming the display interface (Figures 10 - 12, Elements 10-1 - 10-3. Paragraph 100), said design substep comprising a phase of selecting screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) of the plurality of display screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) which are most suitable for (Paragraph 152) broadcasting the visual message (Figures 10 - 12, Element Apple. Paragraph 109) produced, based on the orientation (Paragraph 101) of the activated screens and of the distance (Paragraph 175) which separates the activated screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) of the plurality of display screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72),and
wherein each display screen is a secondary display screen (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) of these smartwatches (Figure 1, Element 10. Paragraph 72), and each secondary screen (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) is in a corresponding watch strap (Seen in Figure 1) of the smartwatch (Figure 1, Element 10. Paragraph 72).
Ishii is silent with regards to wherein the second mode is deactivated, and wherein each of the plurality of smartwatch includes a main screen and a display screen separate from the main screen.
Goel et al. teach wherein the second mode is deactivated (Figure 10E, Element power off. Paragraph 93).
It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the teachings of the display device of Ishii with the display coordination of Goel et al. The motivation to modify the teachings of Ishii with the teachings of Goel et al. is to save power, as taught by Goel et al. (Paragraph 93).
Vinmani et al. teach wherein each of the plurality of smartwatch includes a main screen (Figure 1, Element 106. Paragraph 31) and a display screen (Figure 1, Element 108. Paragraph 31) separate from the main screen (Figure 1, Element 106. Paragraph 31), and wherein each display screen (Figure 1, Element 108. Paragraph 31) is a secondary display screen (Figure 1, Element 108. Paragraph 31) of these smartwatches, and each secondary screen (Figure 1, Element 108. Paragraph 31) is in a corresponding watch strap (Figure 1, Element not labeled, but is the strap. Paragraph 31) of the smartwatch (Figure 1, Element 102. Paragraph 29).
It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the teachings of a user worn display device of Ishii and the display coordination of Goel et al. with the teachings of the multiple screen device of Vinmani et al. The motivation to modify the teachings of Ishii and Goel et al. with the teachings of Vinmani et al. is to provide the user with privacy or secrecy to the user, as taught by Vinmani et al. (Paragraph 48).
Regarding Claim 20, Ishii in view of Goel et al. in view of Vinmani et al. teach the method according to claim 16 (See Above). Ishii teaches wherein the estimation step comprises a substep of transmission (Figure 3, Element 18. Paragraph 78) by the smartwatches (Figure 1, Element 10. Paragraph 72) of said measurement data (Paragraph 101) to a management server (Figure 7, Element 5. Paragraph 78) of the display interface (Figures 10 - 12, Elements 10-1 - 10-3. Paragraph 100).
Regarding Claim 21, Ishii in view of Goel et al. in view of Vinmani et al. teach the method according to claim 16 (See Above). Ishii teaches wherein the display management step comprises a substep of producing the visual message (Figures 10 - 12, Element Apple. Paragraph 109) to be displayed on said display interface (Figures 10 - 12, Elements 10-1 - 10-3. Paragraph 100).
Regarding Claim 22, Ishii in view of Goel et al. in view of Vinmani et al. teach the method according to claim 16 (See Above). Ishii teaches wherein the screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) of the smartwatches (Figure 1, Element 10. Paragraph 72) are each specifically dedicated to (Seen in Figure 12) and configured for the display of a portion of visual message (Figures 10 - 12, Element Apple. Paragraph 109) transmitted by the management server (Figure 7, Element 5. Paragraph 78).
Regarding Claim 23, Ishii in view of Goel et al. in view of Vinmani et al. teach the method according to claim 16 (See Above). Ishii teaches wherein the screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) of the smartwatches (Figure 1, Element 10. Paragraph 72) each have the sole function of (Seen in Figure 12) displaying a portion of the visual message (Figures 10 - 12, Element Apple. Paragraph 109) transmitted by the management server (Figure 7, Element 5. Paragraph 78).
Regarding Claim 24, Ishii in view of Goel et al. in view of Vinmani et al. teach the method according to claim 16 (See Above). Ishii teaches wherein the screens (Figure 1, Element 11. Paragraph 72) of the smartwatches (Figure 1, Element 10. Paragraph 72) each have the sole function and/or purpose of (Seen in Figure 12) constituting said display interface (Figures 10 - 12, Elements 10-1 - 10-3. Paragraph 100).
Regarding Claim 26, Ishii in view of Goel et al. in view of Vinmani et al. teach the method according to claim 16 (See Above). Ishii is silent with regards to wherein the smartwatches each comprise a main screen dedicated to the display of information specifically or exclusively intended for the user thereof.
Vinmani et al. teach wherein the smartwatches each comprise a main screen (Figure 1, Element 106. Paragraph 31) dedicated to the display of information specifically or exclusively intended for the user thereof (Seen in Figures 6a – 10).
It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify the teachings of a user worn display device of Ishii and the display coordination of Goel et al. with the teachings of the multiple screen device of Vinmani et al. The motivation to modify the teachings of Ishii and Goel et al. with the teachings of Vinmani et al. is to provide the user with privacy or secrecy to the user, as taught by Vinmani et al. (Paragraph 48).
Regarding Claim 27, Ishii in view of Goel et al. in view of Vinmani et al. teach a non-transitory computer readable medium storing computer readable instructions thereon that when executed by a computer cause the computer to perform a method according to claim 16 (See Above). Ishii teaches when said program is executed by processing units (Figure 3, Element 14. Paragraph 74) of a smartwatch (Figure 1, Element 10. Paragraph 72) and a management server (Figure 7, Element 5. Paragraph 78) of the display interface (Figures 10 - 12, Elements 10-1 - 10-3. Paragraph 100).
Response to Arguments
Regarding the first argument, in which the applicant asserts that the prior art of record fails to teach at least the newly added limitations to at least Claim 16. The applicant argues that Ishii fails to teach generating portions of the visual message as a function of measurement data relating to each of a location property and an orientation property. The examiner respectfully disagrees with the applicant’s assertion. Ishii discloses “That is, the display device 10 according to the present embodiment differs from the display device 10 in the first embodiment in that a sensor 17 has a function serving as an operation unit, a function serving as a rotational position detector, and a receiver 104 and a transmitter 105 permitting short-distance radio communication having directivity. When the sensor 17 functions as the operation unit, it has an acceleration sensor, a gyro sensor, etc., for example, as a sensor, and detects a state where the user swings his or her arm, for example, to perform various types of operations such as selection of a display image and start/stop of display. When the sensor 17 functions as the rotational position detector, at least one LED 60 and a plurality of photodiodes 61 are provided on each of both side surfaces of the display device, as shown in FIG. 11, for example, as a sensor. In FIG. 11, one LED 60 and 36 photodiodes 61 are arranged (Paragraph 101. Emphasis Added).” Ishii further discloses “A case where the display device 10-2 is fixed in the state shown in FIG. 12 is illustrated. In this case, even if the display device 10-1 and the display device 10-3 are respectively independently rotated in either a direction indicated by an arrow Z1 or a direction indicated by an arrow Z2, the display device 10-1 and the display device 10-3 correct the position where an image is displayed by taking the position where the LED 60 in the display device 10-2 is provided as a display reference position. Therefore, an apple is always integrally displayed (Paragraph 109. Emphasis Added).” Ishii further discloses “Further, in a case where the transfer is performed automatically, the synchronous display program and the display data can be also updated when the display device 10 leads to a communication allowable range of the external equipment. By such a configuration, applications such as a change in the contents of display of images which are synchronously displayed are allowed depending on places in an auditorium in a concert hall, for example (Paragraph 174. Emphasis Added).” Therefore, it is clear by the disclosure of Ishii that the visual message displayed as a function of a broadcasting property and the broadcasting property including a location property (places in an auditorium) and an orientation property (based on the rotation). The Office is unmoved by the applicant’s argument and the rejection is maintained.
All other arguments are considered moot in light of the above rejection and/or the response to the first argument.
Conclusion
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure:
Mager et al. (U.S. PG Pub 2003/0017823) disclose a mobile device where a secondary display screen (Element 714) is used in a venue event in order for multiple users to make visible displays, similar to the instant invention.
DePrycker et al. (U.S. PG Pub 2009/0230895) disclose and LED unit that is used in an arena in order to make a visible display in the crowd, similar to the instant invention.
Chang (U.S. PG Pub 2014/0009366) disclose a plurality for display devices that are put in a matrix form in order to create a bigger display area, similar to the instant invention.
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW B SCHNIREL whose telephone number is (571)270-7690. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 10 - 6 EST.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Boddie can be reached at 571-272-0666. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/A.B.S/Examiner, Art Unit 2625
/WILLIAM BODDIE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2625
Prosecution Insights