Office Action Predictor
Application No. 17/775,405

MEMBER FOR ELECTRICITY STORAGE DEVICES, AND ELECTRICITY STORAGE DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 09, 2022
Examiner
NGUYEN, KEVIN NMN
Art Unit
1752
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Nippon Electric Glass Co., LTD.
OA Round
4 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

84%
Career Allow Rate
41 granted / 49 resolved
Without
With
+17.0%
Interview Lift
avg trend
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
43 pending
92
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
66.3%
+26.3% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/31/2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Status of Claims The Applicant’s amendment and arguments, filed 10/31/2025, has been entered. Claims 1-11 are amended. Support for the amendments is found in the original filing, and there is no new matter. Upon considered said amendments and arguments, the previous 35 U.S.C.102 rejection set forth in Office Action mailed 07/31/2025 has been withdrawn, and amended and new grounds of rejections under 35 U.S.C. 102 citing to a new reference are set forth below as necessitated by the claim amendments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yui et al. (JP 2015198055 A, hereinafter Yui). Regarding Claim 1, Yui discloses the limitations regarding a sodium-ion all-solid-state battery (Yui, sodium secondary battery using a solid electrolyte that allows sodium ions to pass through, [0034]) comprising: a solid electrolyte layer containing a sodium ion-conducting solid electrolyte (Yui, solid electrolyte that allows sodium ions to pass through, [0034]), an alkali metal layer consisting of metallic sodium laid on the solid electrolyte layer and containing an alkali metal (Yui, metallic sodium foil is directly attached to the sheet electrode, and the electrolyte is located between the positive and negative electrode, [0026, 0063]; the Examiner notes that the metallic sodium foil is contacting the solid electrolyte); and a first electrode layer laid on the alkali metal layer and containing a material capable of absorbing and releasing alkali metal ions (Yui, a negative electrode of Na-containing Sn formed into a sheet electrode, [0026, 0029]). Regarding Claim 2, Yui discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Yui discloses the limitations regarding a sodium-ion all-solid-state battery (Yui, sodium secondary battery using a solid electrolyte that allows sodium ions to pass through, [0034]), wherein the first electrode layer is a negative electrode layer (Yui, a negative electrode of Na-containing Sn formed into a sheet electrode, [0026, 0029]). Regarding Claim 3, Yui discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Yui discloses the limitations regarding a sodium-ion all-solid-state battery (Yui, sodium secondary battery using a solid electrolyte that allows sodium ions to pass through, [0034]), a negative-electrode active material contained in the negative electrode layer is a compound containing at least one selected from the group consisting of metal, alloy, and an alkali metal element of the same type as contained in the alkali metal layer (Yui, the negative electrode contains, as a negative electrode active material, sodium-doped tin, or a sodium-doped tin-containing alloy represented by Na-Sn-M, wherein M is Co, Fe, Mn, Ni, Ti, or Cu, [0018-0019]). Regarding Claim 4, Yui discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Yui discloses the limitations regarding a sodium-ion all-solid-state battery (Yui, sodium secondary battery using a solid electrolyte that allows sodium ions to pass through, [0034]), wherein at least a portion of the negative electrode layer is made of an alloy containing the alkali metal element of the same type as contained in the alkali metal layer (Yui, the negative electrode contains, as a negative electrode active material, sodium-doped tin, or a sodium-doped tin-containing alloy represented by Na-Sn-M, wherein M is Co, Fe, Mn, Ni, Ti, or Cu, [0018-0019]). Regarding Claim 5, Yui discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Yui discloses the limitations regarding a sodium-ion all-solid-state battery (Yui, sodium secondary battery using a solid electrolyte that allows sodium ions to pass through, [0034]), wherein the alkali metal contained in the alkali metal layer is diffused into the negative electrode layer metal (Yui, metallic sodium foil is directly attached to the sheet electrode, [0026]). Regarding Claim 6, Yui discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Yui discloses the limitations regarding a sodium-ion all-solid-state battery (Yui, sodium secondary battery using a solid electrolyte that allows sodium ions to pass through, [0034]), the negative-electrode active material is a compound containing Na (Yui, the negative electrode contains, as a negative electrode active material, sodium-doped tin, or a sodium-doped tin-containing alloy represented by Na-Sn-M, wherein M is Co, Fe, Mn, Ni, Ti, or Cu, [0018-0019]). Regarding Claim 7, Yui discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Yui discloses the limitations regarding a sodium-ion all-solid-state battery (Yui, sodium battery, [0014]), wherein the negative-electrode active material contains at least one element selected from the group consisting of Sn (Yui, the negative electrode contains, as a negative electrode active material, sodium-doped tin, or a sodium-doped tin-containing alloy represented by Na-Sn-M, wherein M is Co, Fe, Mn, Ni, Ti, or Cu, [0018-0019]). Regarding Claim 8, Yui discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Yui discloses the limitations regarding a sodium-ion all-solid-state battery (Yui, sodium secondary battery using a solid electrolyte that allows sodium ions to pass through, [0034]), wherein the electrode layer contains a binder (Yui, the negative electrode of the sodium secondary battery can optionally contain a binder powder, [0027]). Regarding Claim 9, Yui discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Yui discloses the limitations regarding a sodium-ion all-solid-state battery (Yui, sodium secondary battery using a solid electrolyte that allows sodium ions to pass through, [0034]), wherein the solid electrolyte layer contains an oxide (Yui, solid electrolytes having sodium ion conductivity, for example, NASICON, Na3Zr2Si2PO12, and polymer electrolytes having sodium ion conductivity, for example polyethylene oxide, [0044]). Regarding Claim 10, Yui discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Yui discloses the limitations regarding a sodium-ion all-solid-state battery (Yui, sodium secondary battery using a solid electrolyte that allows sodium ions to pass through, [0034]), wherein the alkali metal layer has a thickness of not less than 5 nm and not more than 500 µm (Yui, a commercially available sodium metal sheet formed into a sheet of the same size as the sheet electrode was directly attached to the sheet electrode, and the sheet electrode has a thickness of 0.5 mm, or 500 µm , [0072, 0089]; the disclosed thickness of 500 µm falls within the claimed range of 5 nm to 500 µm). Regarding Claim 11, Yui discloses all of the claim limitations as set forth above. Yui discloses the limitations regarding the sodium-ion all-solid-state battery (Yui, sodium secondary battery using a solid electrolyte that allows sodium ions to pass through, [0034]) further comprising a second electrode layer laid on the solid electrolyte layer to sandwich the solid electrolyte layer together with the alkali metal layer (Yui, the sodium secondary battery comprises a positive electrode, a negative electrode, and an electrolyte between both electrodes, [0063]). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks (Pages , filed 10/31/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-3, 5, 8, and 10 under 35 U.S.C 102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Yui et al. (JP 2015198055 A), as noted above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEVIN NGUYEN whose telephone number is (703)756-1745. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9:50 - 7:50 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NICHOLAS A SMITH can be reached at (571) 272-8760. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /K.N./Examiner, Art Unit 1752 /NICHOLAS A SMITH/Supervisory Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 17, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 21, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 09, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Jul 01, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 15, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Oct 31, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §102
Mar 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12597664
Reinforced carrier device for a battery pack and process for the assembling of a reinforced battery pack
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12580256
TRACTION BATTERY PACKS WITH MIXED MATERIAL TRAY STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12567636
Battery Pack Having Handle
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12512507
A SULFIDIC SOLID ELECTROYLYTE AND ITS PRECURSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12489115
NEGATIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY, NEGATIVE ELECTRODE, AND LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.0%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 49 resolved cases by this examiner