Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/775,525

BRAKE HOUSING

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 09, 2022
Priority
Nov 08, 2019 — AU 2019904210 +1 more
Examiner
BURCH, MELODY M
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Advanced Braking Pty Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
665 granted / 1037 resolved
+12.1% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1082
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
65.8%
+25.8% vs TC avg
§102
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1037 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 4/9/26 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 22, 27, and 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The phrase “the housing” lacks proper antecedent basis in the claim. The remaining claims are indefinite due to their dependency from claim 22. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 22, 27, and 28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Patent Application 2016/0025162 to Morse et al. Re: claim 22. Morse et al. show in figure brake system for attachment to an axle of a vehicle, the brake system comprising a braking mechanism having a rotor 24 attached to a hub 42, and a caliper 26 for receiving a portion of the outer circumference of the rotor permitting stopping rotation of the rotor, and comprising a body 20 defining the space for containment of the braking mechanism, and a circular portion shown in figure 2 having an outer periphery shown for example within elements 80 configured to divert debris generated during operation of the vehicle from the outer periphery, wherein the outer periphery comprises a plurality of protrusions shown between elements 80 protruding outwards from the outer periphery and arranged in a spaced apart relationship with respect to each other as shown to define a plurality of channels 80 arranged in a spaced apart relationship with respect to each other as shown best in figure 7, each channel having a limited circumferential extent and extending transversely across the outer periphery from one side of the housing to the other side of the housing as shown in figure 7, wherein each channel comprises a first or top/left open end at the one side of the housing and a second or bottom/right open end at the other side of the housing to divert the debris away from the outer periphery, through the open ends of the channels. Re: claims 27 and 28. Morse et al. show in figures 2 and 7 wherein the circular portion is defined by outer peripheral sections or the surfaces of elements 80 defined by wall segments arranged side by side at particular orientations with respect to each other defining surfaces or the surfaces of elements 80 configured to avoid build-up of debris by diverting the debris through the open ends. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3-4, 11-12, 15-21, 23, and 26 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 22 and its dependent claims have been considered but are moot because the new grounds of rejection do not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MELODY M BURCH whose telephone number is (571)272-7114. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 6:30AM-3PM, generally. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at 571-272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. mmb May 5, 2026 /MELODY M BURCH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3616
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Sep 10, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 09, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Apr 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12631234
DRUM BRAKE
3y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624740
FREQUENCY SENSITIVE SHOCK ABSORBER
3y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624739
CONTROLLABLE VIBRATION DAMPER
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618446
DAMPER ASSEMBLY
3y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618451
RAPID ACTIVE VIBRATION REDUCTION METHOD FOR HIGH-SPEED MOTION STAGE
3y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+26.0%)
3y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1037 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month