Office Action Predictor
Application No. 17/780,884

METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROVIDING DATA FROM AN INTERNAL DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM OF AN INDUSTRIAL PLANT TO AN EXTERNAL DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM

Final Rejection §112§DP
Filed
May 27, 2022
Examiner
BARRY, LANCE LEONARD
Art Unit
2457
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
4 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

85%
Career Allow Rate
333 granted / 393 resolved
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
avg trend
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
28 pending
421
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
§103
44.4%
+4.4% vs TC avg
§102
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§112
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§112 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Rejoinder Claims 22, 23, 26-31, 33-36, and 39-45 are allowable. Claim 32, previously withdrawn from consideration as a result of an election of species requirement, require all the limitations of an allowable claim. Pursuant to the procedures set forth in MPEP § 821.04(a), the requirement is hereby withdrawn and the latter claim(s) is/are hereby rejoined and fully examined for patentability under 37 CFR 1.104. In view of the withdrawal of the requirement, the applicant(s) is/are advised that if any claim presented in a continuation or divisional application is anticipated by, or includes all the limitations of, a claim that is allowable in the present application, such claim may be subject to provisional statutory and/or nonstatutory double patenting rejections over the claims of the instant application. Once the requirement is withdrawn, the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 121 are no longer applicable. See In re Ziegler, 443 F.2d 1211, 1215, 170 USPQ 129, 131-32 (CCPA 1971). See also MPEP § 804.01. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 32 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Specifically, “the data filter (DF)” lacks antecedent basis. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which the applicant(s) may become aware. The abstract is objected to for not being descriptive as it could be. It should reflect the amendments of Jan. 6, 2026. Other Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to the instant disclosure. For example, US 20200192344 includes one or more edge manager devices 102 that are coupled to industrial machines (¶ 44). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Lance Leonard Barry whose telephone number is (571)272-5856. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 700-430 ET 730-1630. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to email the Examiner. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ario Etienne can be reached on 571-272-4001. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LANCE LEONARD BARRY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2457
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 27, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 01, 2024
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 01, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 12, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 14, 2024
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 14, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 05, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Nov 13, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 13, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 10, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Jun 20, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 18, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Jan 06, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Mar 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12580993
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DISCOVERING USER PLANE FUNCTION UPF IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12568149
DYNAMIC PLACEMENT OF SERVICES CLOSER TO ENDPOINT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562792
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CSI CONFIGURATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556610
Devices and Methods for Location-Dependent Prioritized Communication
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12550218
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR ENABLING SECONDARY CELL GROUP (SCG) SUSPENSION AND RESUMPTION OR PRIMARY SECONDARY CELL (PSCELL) DEACTIVATION AND ACTIVATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+5.1%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 393 resolved cases by this examiner