Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/782,172

REVERSIBLE CELL DETECTION VIA MHC WITH CONJUGATES HAVING AN ENZYMATICALLY CLEAVABLE DETECTION MOIETY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 03, 2022
Examiner
PAK, MICHAEL D
Art Unit
1674
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Miltenyi Biotec B.V. & Co. KG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
405 granted / 694 resolved
-1.6% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
718
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
§103
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§112
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 694 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of XXVI in the reply filed on October 10, 2025 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Applicant elected the species election in a phone interview on November 26, 2025. Applicants elect the species according to conjugate D in paragraph 182-184 and claim 4 (i.e. formula IV). Formula (IV) = (Xo-L)n – P – (V-Ym)q wherein X = fluorescein which is xanthene in claim 6. The n = 23, o=1, q=4, m=2, P = dextran. V and L have chemically the same linker backbone: polyethylene glycol (PEG). Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction/species requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 1-15 are pending. Claims 9-15 are withdrawn. Claims 1-8 are examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) s 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dose et al.(EP 3037821) in view of Wucherpfennig et al.(US 2005/0003431). Dose disclose the claimed formula (I) where the Y is MHC, P is a nucleic acid enzymatically degradable spacer, X is a fluorescence, o and m are 1-100 (paragraph 14-15, 25, 35, 39, 41-42; page 11, claims 1,5). Dose does not disclose the Y bound to P via the C-terminus. Wucherpfennig disclose the conjugation to the lavel via C-terminal regions of an MHC binding domain to ensure an orientation which allows for interaction of the MHC binding domain with a cognate T cell receptor (para 144). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to incorporate the teaching of Wucherpfennig to create the MHC with the C-terminus conjugation. One of ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to incorporate the C-terminus conjugation because the C-terminus conjugation allows the orientation which allows for the interaction of the MHC binding domain with the cognate T cell receptor. No claims are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL D PAK whose telephone number is (571)272-0879. The examiner can normally be reached on flexible time. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vanessa Ford can be reached on 571-272-0857. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL D PAK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1674
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 03, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595292
Interleukin-2 receptor (IL2R) and interleukin-2 (IL2) variants for specific activation of immune effector cells
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590959
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING CELL SIGNALING PROTEIN ACTIVITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577288
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS RELATING TO CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12559562
TREATMENT OF CANCER USING HUMANIZED ANTI-EGFRvIII CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12551531
NOVEL INTERLEUKIN-2 AND USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+30.7%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 694 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month