Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/782,682

Electronic Module and Modular System for a Drug Delivery Device

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 06, 2022
Examiner
FARRAR, LAUREN PENG
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sanofi
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
593 granted / 753 resolved
+8.8% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
60 currently pending
Career history
813
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
51.9%
+11.9% vs TC avg
§102
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§112
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 753 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 21 recites “a complementary shaped recess of the mechanical counter coding feature”. However a recess that is associated with the mechanical counter coding feature is already recited in claim 16 from which claim 21 depends. Therefore it is unclear whether the recess of claim 21 is the same or different than the one in claim 16. For purposes of examination the recess of claim 21 is the same as the recess of claim 16. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 16-35 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Byerly et al. (WO 2018/013419 A1). With regard to claim 16, Byerly discloses An electronic module (Fig. 5, element 20, see also Fig. 6) configured for attachment to a proximal end of a drug delivery device (Fig. 2 showing the entire system, the drug delivery device is 10) in a predefined fastening configuration (see Fig. 2), the drug delivery device comprising an elongated housing (12) extending in a longitudinal direction and comprising a distal end (at 24) and the proximal end (shown in Fig. 5), the electronic module comprising: a mechanical coding (108) comprising a mechanical coding feature (108/110, 108 extends in the longitudinal direction to engaged with the drug delivery device) to engage with a mechanical counter coding feature (39/41) of a mechanical counter coding (38) provided at the proximal end of the drug delivery device (p.6, line 30 to p. 7, line 16), wherein one of the mechanical coding feature (110) and the mechanical counter coding feature (39/41) comprises a protrusion (mechanical coding 108 is considered a protrusion in the longitudinal direction as it extends towards the distal end of the drug delivery device) extending in the longitudinal direction, and wherein the other one of the mechanical coding feature and the mechanical counter coding feature comprises a recess (39 are a plurality of ridges that create recesses for holding protrusion 110 of the mechanical coding feature. See Fig. 3, showing the recesses 39), and wherein when a geometric shape of the protrusion is not matching with a geometric shape of the recess (p. 10, lines 9-15), or when a position of the protrusion in a plane transverse to the longitudinal direction is not matching with a position of the recess in the transverse plane, or when a longitudinal extent of the protrusion is larger than a longitudinal extent of the recess, the mechanical coding and the mechanical counter coding being operable to prevent a fastening of the electronic module to the proximal end of the drug delivery device in a predefined fastening configuration (p.10, lines 9-15, keyed features define the connection between a specific module with the drug delivery device and prevents the connection of the incorrect module to the proximal end of an incorrect drug delivery device). With regard to claim 17, Byerly discloses further comprising a fastening element (edge surface of 110 that contacts ridge 41) configured to mechanically engage with a complementary shaped counter fastening element (41) of the drug delivery device in the predefined fastening configuration (see Fig. 5). With regard to claim 18, Byerly discloses wherein the mechanical coding (108) is defined by at least one of a position, an orientation and a longitudinal extent of the mechanical coding feature relative to the fastening element (p. 10, lines 9-15, p. 9, line 28-p.10, line 8). With regard to claim 19, Byerly discloses further comprising at least one longitudinal extension (Fig. 6, element 106) extending distally from a distal end of the electronic module and configured to extend into or through an aperture at the proximal end of the drug delivery device (extends into the skirt 38 apertures 39). With regard to claim 20, Byerly discloses wherein the mechanical coding is defined by at least one of a position, an orientation and a longitudinal extent of the mechanical coding feature relative to the longitudinal extension (p. 10, lines 9-15, p. 9, line 28-p.10, line 8). With regard to claim 21, Byerly discloses wherein the mechanical coding feature (108/110) comprises the protrusion protruding in a longitudinal distal direction (108 is considered longitudinal as it extends up and down along the side of the electronic module) from a distally facing surface (distal surface of the cap 120 as shown in Fig. 5) of the electronic module and configured to engage with a complementary shaped recess (39) of the mechanical counter coding feature. With regard to claim 22, Byerly discloses wherein the distally facing (the side wall 120 of the electronic module having a distal face, facing the drug delivery device) surface of the electronic module is in longitudinal abutment with a complementary shaped proximally facing surface of the drug delivery device (the claims do not require direct contact and therefore the distal face of 120 is considered is abutment with the drug delivery device via element 108). With regard to claim 23, Byerly discloses wherein the mechanical coding (108/110) comprises a coding section comprising a number of n discrete spatially non-overlapping coding feature positions (where each of 110 are located) and a number of k mechanical coding features ( each of 110) each one of which located on one of the coding feature positions, wherein n and k are integer numbers and wherein k less than or equal to n, (they are equal as 110 the coding features are considered located at specific positions equal to the number of coding features). With regard to claim 24, Byerly discloses A drug delivery device (Fig. 2 and 5) comprising: a housing (12) comprising a distal end (at 24) and a proximal end (at end 102), wherein the proximal end is configured for attachment of an electronic module (20, also see Fig. 5) in a predefined fastening configuration (the location where it is fastened is considered predefined without further limitations), wherein the electronic module comprises: a mechanical coding (108) comprising a mechanical coding feature (110 can be considered a feature or any other portion of 108 can be considered a feature as the term is broad and does not impart any specific structure) to engage with a mechanical counter coding feature (38/39) of a mechanical counter coding (38) provided at the proximal end of the drug delivery device, wherein one of the mechanical coding feature and the mechanical counter coding feature comprises a protrusion extending in the longitudinal direction (the distal end of 108 is considered a feature that extends in the longitudinal direction as it faces up and down parallel to the longitudinal axis and the term feature does not impart any specific structural limitations), and wherein the other one of the mechanical coding feature and the mechanical counter coding feature comprises a recess (39 is a recess which is better seen in Fig. 3), and wherein when a geometric shape of the protrusion is not matching with a geometric shape of the recess (p. 10, lines 9-15, p. 9, line 28-p.10, line 8), or when a position of the protrusion in a plane transverse to the longitudinal direction is not matching with a position of the recess in the transverse plane, or when a longitudinal extent of the protrusion is larger than a longitudinal extent of the recess, the mechanical coding and the mechanical counter coding being operable to prevent a fastening of the electronic module to the proximal end of the drug delivery device in a predefined fastening configuration (p. 10, lines 9-15, p. 9, line 28-p.10, line 8, if the incorrect module is used with the incorrect drug delivery device the module is improperly fastened and therefore not in the predefined configuration), the drug delivery device comprising: a drive mechanism (30, Fig. 2) configured to set and/or to deliver a dose of a drug out of the distal end (p. 6, lines 11-21); and wherein the mechanical counter coding (38) is provided at the proximal end and comprises the mechanical counter coding feature (39) to engage with the mechanical coding feature (110) of the mechanical coding of the electronic module (as shown in Fig. 5). With regard to claim 25, Byerly discloses further comprising a counter fastening element (the surface of 110 which contacts the ridge 41 for holding the module in place is considered the fastening element as read in light of the specification, further definition of the fastening element would be needed to overcome the current rejection) configured to mechanically engage with a complementary shaped fastening element (41) of the electronic module in the predefined fastening configuration (as shown in Fig. 5). With regard to claim 26, Byerly discloses wherein the mechanical counter coding (38) is defined by at least one of a position, an orientation, and a longitudinal extent of the mechanical counter coding feature relative to the counter fastening element (p. 10, lines 9-15, p. 9, line 28-p.10, line 8, if the incorrect module is used with the incorrect drug delivery device the module is improperly fastened and therefore not in the predefined configuration). With regard to claim 27, Byerly discloses wherein the mechanical counter coding feature comprises the recess (39) configured to receive or to engage with a complementary shaped and distally extending protrusion (110 which is part of the distally extending protrusion 108) of the coding feature of the mechanical coding when in the predefined fastening configuration (as shown in Fig. 5). With regard to claim 28, Byerly discloses wherein the recess (39) is provided in at least one of a proximal facing surface (38 is a proximal facing surface as it extends in a proximal direction as shown in Fig. 5, the recess 39 is formed in the side of 38 and therefore considered to be in at least a proximal facing surface) of the drug delivery device, an outside surface of a sidewall of the drug delivery device and an inside surface of the sidewall of the drug delivery device. With regard to claim 29, Byerly discloses further comprising a drug container filled with the drug (in 22 as shown in Fig. 2). With regard to claim 30, Byerly discloses A modular system (Fig. 2 and 5) comprising: an electronic module (20) configured for attachment to a proximal end of a drug delivery device (as shown in Fig. 5) in a predefined fastening configuration (the location where it is fastened is considered predefined without further limitations), the drug delivery device comprising an elongated housing (12/14) extending in a longitudinal direction and comprising a distal end (at 24) and the proximal end (generally where 102 is pointing), the electronic module comprising: a mechanical coding comprising a mechanical coding feature (108/110) to engage with a mechanical counter coding feature (38/39) of a mechanical counter coding (38) provided at the proximal end of the drug delivery device, wherein one of the mechanical coding feature and the mechanical counter coding feature comprises a protrusion (the distal end of 108 is considered a feature that extends in the longitudinal direction as it faces up and down parallel to the longitudinal axis and the term feature does not impart any specific structural limitations) extending in the longitudinal direction, and wherein the other one of the mechanical coding feature and the mechanical counter coding feature comprises a recess (39 is a recess, better seen in Fig. 3), and wherein when a geometric shape of the protrusion is not matching with a geometric shape of the recess (p. 10, lines 9-15, p. 9, line 28-p.10, line 8, if the incorrect module is used with the incorrect drug delivery device the module is improperly fastened and therefore not in the predefined configuration), or when a position of the protrusion in a plane transverse to the longitudinal direction is not matching with a position of the recess in the transverse plane, or when a longitudinal extent of the protrusion is larger than a longitudinal extent of the recess, the mechanical coding and the mechanical counter coding being operable to prevent a fastening of the electronic module to the proximal end of the drug delivery device in a predefined fastening configuration (p. 10, lines 9-15, p. 9, line 28-p.10, line 8, if the incorrect module is used with the incorrect drug delivery device the module is improperly fastened and therefore not in the predefined configuration), and the drug delivery device; wherein the mechanical coding (108/110) of the electronic module matches with the mechanical counter coding (39) of the drug delivery device (as shown in Fig. 5, the two components fit together), and wherein the mechanical coding mechanically engages with the mechanical counter coding when the electronic module and the drug delivery device are in the predefined fastening configuration (as shown in Fig. 5). With regard to claim 31, Byerly discloses further comprising a counter fastening element (the surface of 110 which contacts the ridge 41 for holding the module in place is considered the fastening element as read in light of the specification, further definition of the fastening element would be needed to overcome the current rejection) configured to mechanically engage with a complementary shaped fastening element (41) of the electronic module in the predefined fastening configuration (as shown in Fig. 5). With regard to claim 32, Byerly discloses wherein the mechanical coding (108) is defined by at least one of a position, an orientation and a longitudinal extent of the mechanical coding feature relative to the fastening element (p. 10, lines 9-15, p. 9, line 28-p.10, line 8). With regard to claim 33, Byerly discloses further comprising at least one longitudinal extension (Fig. 6, element 106) extending distally from a distal end of the electronic module and configured to extend into or through an aperture at the proximal end of the drug delivery device (extends into the skirt 38 apertures 39). With regard to claim 34, Byerly discloses wherein the mechanical coding is defined by at least one of a position, an orientation and a longitudinal extent of the mechanical coding feature relative to the longitudinal extension (p. 10, lines 9-15, p. 9, line 28-p.10, line 8). With regard to claim 35, Byerly discloses wherein the mechanical coding feature (108/110) comprises the protrusion protruding in a longitudinal distal direction (108 is considered longitudinal as it extends up and down along the side of the electronic module) from a distally facing surface (distal surface of the cap 120 as shown in Fig. 5) of the electronic module and configured to engage with a complementary shaped recess (39) of the mechanical counter coding feature. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAUREN P FARRAR whose telephone number is (571)270-1496. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kevin Sirmons can be reached at 571-272-4965. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Lauren P Farrar/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594410
DEVICE FOR DELIVERING AN ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOSITION INTO A MEDICAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12575966
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ULTRASOUND-ENHANCED DELIVERY OF DRUGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569662
MEDICAL CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564681
PEN-LIKE SYRINGE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558484
Autoinjector
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+15.1%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 753 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month