Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/782,809

DEVICE FOR ADJUSTING THE INCLINATION OF AN OBJECT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 06, 2022
Examiner
BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Endepro GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
975 granted / 1218 resolved
+28.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1241
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
38.3%
-1.7% vs TC avg
§102
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1218 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-28 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1, the phrase "for example" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Regarding claims 8, 12-13 and 26 the phrase "in particular" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. A broad range or limitation together with a narrow range or limitation that falls within the broad range or limitation (in the same claim) may be considered indefinite if the resulting claim does not clearly set forth the metes and bounds of the patent protection desired. See MPEP § 2173.05(c). In the present instance, claims 20 and 28 recites the broad recitation “direction” in claim 20 and “elongated , flexible” in claim 28, and the claim also recites “a radial direction” in claim 20 and “non-stretchable” in claim 28 which is the narrower statement of the range/limitation. The claim(s) are considered indefinite because there is a question or doubt as to whether the feature introduced by such narrower language is (a) merely exemplary of the remainder of the claim, and therefore not required, or (b) a required feature of the claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-12, 16-24 and 28 as best understood is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yao et al (EP 2878513). Yao et al. shows the use of a device (1) for adjusting the height or the distance or the inclination of an object (5) in relation to a structure (6) to which the object is displaceably or pivotably coupled. The coupling of the object to the structure comprising a traction means (501,502) having at least one strand (501,502) whose free length is adjustable, and which in the region of one of its ends is connected to the structure, and in the region of its other end is connected to the device (Fig. 2) that is fixed to the object to be adjusted, and which during the adjustment has the tendency to be automatically shortened, wherein in the frame (101) of the device, locking of a set length (see Fig. 2) of the adjustable strand is provided, which is brought about by elements that interlock in a form-fit manner. Regarding claims 2-3, the device of Yao et al. is characterized in that the tendency toward automatic shortening of the adjustable strand is brought about by a spring element (7), situated inside the device (Fig. 3), which is not directly connected to the traction means that forms the adjustable strand (5), but, rather, by use of an additional movable or movably supported intermediate element designed as a winding body (2) with which some other element engages (the teeth) in a form-fit manner during the locking in order to block a movement of the intermediate element, and thus to fix the set length of the adjustable strand (Figs. 2-3). Regarding claims 5-6, Yao et al. shows the use of two or more traction means (501,502) wind around the winding body. Regarding claims 7-9, Yao et al. shows the traction means anchored in to the winding body through openings in the circumference of the winding body (Figs. 2-3). Regarding claims 16-24 the winding body has a locking device comprising an engagement element (4) and a row of teeth (see Fig. 3) partially around the winding body whereby the winding body is provided at a chassis, a base plate and or a housing (101) of the device (as shown in Fig. 3). The engagement element has one tooth and is pretensioned by a (tension) spring (7) and actuating element (3) protruding from the housing. Claim(s) 1-28 as best understood is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Matsumoto (JP 4650658). Matsumoto shows the use of a device (1) for adjusting the height or the distance or the inclination of an object (A) in relation to a structure (Fig. 1) to which the object is displaceably or pivotably coupled. The coupling of the object to the structure comprising a traction means (B) having at least one strand (as shown in Fig. 1) whose free length is adjustable, and which in the region of one of its ends is connected to the structure, and in the region of its other end is connected to the device (Fig. 4) that is fixed to the object to be adjusted, and which during the adjustment has the tendency to be automatically shortened, wherein in the frame (Figs. 3-4) of the device, locking of a set length (see Fig. 1) of the adjustable strand is provided, which is brought about by elements that interlock in a form-fit manner. Regarding claims 2-3, the device of Matsumoto is characterized in that the tendency toward automatic shortening of the adjustable strand is brought about by a spring element (10), situated inside the device (Fig. 3), which is not directly connected to the traction means that forms the adjustable strand (5), but, rather, by use of an additional movable or movably supported intermediate element designed as a winding body (5) with which some other element engages (the teeth) in a form-fit manner during the locking in order to block a movement of the intermediate element, and thus to fix the set length of the adjustable strand (Figs. 2-3). Regarding claims 5-6, Matsumoto. shows the use of two or more traction means (Figs. 1,3) wind around the winding body. Regarding claims 7-9, Matsumoto shows the traction means anchored in to the winding body through openings (9) in the circumference of the winding body (Figs. 2-3). Regarding claims 16-24 the winding body has a locking device comprising an engagement element (25,26) and a row of teeth (8) partially around the winding body whereby the winding body is provided at a chassis, a base plate and or a housing (Fig. 4) of the device (as shown in Fig. 3). The engagement element has one tooth and is pretensioned by a (tension) spring (22) and actuating element (20) protruding from the housing. Regarding claim 25-27 the actuating element has an opening (underneath the actuating element) and the actuating element is linear displaceably (vertically as shown in Fig. 7). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY D BARFIELD whose telephone number is (571)272-6852. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY D BARFIELD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636 adb July 27, 2024
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Feb 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600480
VEHICLE PASSENGER SEAT ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594860
VEHICLE SEAT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594859
VEHICLE SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593921
SEAT SUPPORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593918
CROSS-ELASTIC DIRECTOR'S CHAIR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+13.9%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1218 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month