Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/783,802

LITHIUM METAL COMPOSITE OXIDE, POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, POSITIVE ELECTRODE FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jun 09, 2022
Priority
Dec 13, 2019 — JP 2019-225318 +1 more
Examiner
AMPONSAH, OSEI K
Art Unit
1752
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
514 granted / 710 resolved
+7.4% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
756
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
69.5%
+29.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 710 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 5-9 of Remarks, filed 06-10-2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-4 and 6-10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of the newly added claim 11. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding the recitation “…wherein in a cumulative frequency distribution curve of an equivalent spherical diameter of said primary particles, when the total cumulative volume is taken as 100% and a point at which a cumulative frequency reaches 50% is taken as SD50 from a side with a smaller equivalent spherical diameter, SD50 is 2.7 µm or more” Examiner submits that the spherical diameter [SD50] of 2.7 is only recorded in Example 1 (see Table 1) and the upper limit of the spherical diameter [SD50] is clearly 10 µm or less as shown in Applicant’s disclosure and Table 1. Therefore, Applicant’s claim of SD50 is 2.7 µm or more is clearly indefinite and fails to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor regards as the invention. Examiner recommends an amendment to claim 1 that incorporates the claimed subject matter of the spherical diameter [SD] which is more aligned with the data provided in Table 1 and supported by ranges disclosed in Applicant’s specification. Such claimed subject matter would support criticality of the particle morphology and improvement in battery characteristics. Claims 2-4, 6-10, and 12 also rejected for being dependent on rejected claim 1. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OSEI K AMPONSAH whose telephone number is (571)270-3446. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NICHOLAS A SMITH can be reached at (571)272-8760. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OSEI K AMPONSAH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Jul 30, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 21, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 21, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 28, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 10, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749715
NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE AND SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY MODULE, BATTERY PACK AND ELECTRICAL DEVICE CONTAINING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12731811
Battery Module Including Foldable Side Plate and Method for Manufacturing Same
5y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725834
HIGH-CONCENTRATION HIGH-ENTROPY ELECTROLYTE, METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME, AND BATTERY
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725835
ELECTROLYTE SYSTEMS INCLUDING PERFORMANCE-ENHANCING ADDITIVES, AND ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719091
METHOD OF IMPROVING FIRE-RESISTANCE OF A LITHIUM BATTERY
8y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.1%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 710 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month