Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 17/784,224

PYRAZOLO[1,5-a]PYRIDINE COMPOUND, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND USE THEREOF

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Jun 10, 2022
Priority
Dec 11, 2019 — CN 201911266900.X +1 more
Examiner
AGUIRRE, AMANDA L
Art Unit
1626
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Shenzhen Zhongge Biological Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
429 granted / 556 resolved
+17.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
570
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 556 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims Claims 1, 4-9, 11-13 and 16-21 are currently pending. Claims 7-9 and 16-21 are withdrawn. Claims 1, 4-6 and 12-13 are rejected. Claim 11 is allowed. Response to Amendment/Arguments The amendment filed October 28, 2025 is compliant with the requirements of 37 CFR 1.121(c), accordingly the amendment has been entered. Applicant’s arguments have been fully considered and are addressed below: Objection to the Specification The objection of the specification for typographical errors has been overcome by the amendment correcting the typographical errors. The objection has been withdrawn. Objection to the Claims The objection of the claims 1, 2 and 6 for informalities has been overcome by the amendments to claims 1 and 6 and cancellation of claim 2. The objection has been withdrawn. 35 USC § 112 Rejections The rejection of claim 11 under 35 USC 112(d) has been overcome by rewriting the claim in independent form. The rejection has been withdrawn. 35 USC § 102 Rejections The anticipation rejection of: claims 1-6 and 11-13, over Zhu et al. US 2023/0322769 A1 (earliest priority date: Aug. 20, 2020) as evidenced by Brayton, C. F. Cornell Vet. 1986, 76, 61-90, and claims 1-6 and 11-13, over Wang et al. WO 2020/200316 A1 (pub. Oct. 8, 2020; earliest priority date: Apr. 3, 2019) as evidenced by its English equivalent US 2022/0220104 A1, and as further evidenced by Dorokhov et al. Physiol. Rev. 2015, 95, 603-644 and Brayton, C. F. Cornell Vet. 1986, 76, 61-90 have been overcome by narrowing the scope of “B”, in formula I PNG media_image1.png 196 517 media_image1.png Greyscale , to exclude R10 and R11 from joining together to form a ring, when B is -NR10R11. This circumvents Zhu’s and Wang’s compounds wherein instant B is a heterocyclic ring, such as Zhu’s compound 66, PNG media_image2.png 226 530 media_image2.png Greyscale , and Wang’s compounds PNG media_image3.png 250 429 media_image3.png Greyscale , PNG media_image4.png 133 197 media_image4.png Greyscale and PNG media_image5.png 146 242 media_image5.png Greyscale . The rejection has been withdrawn. Restriction/Election In accordance with the MPEP 803.02 and as necessitated by amendment, examination of the Markush-type claims has been extended, beyond the elected species PNG media_image6.png 382 671 media_image6.png Greyscale , to non-elected species encompassed by claim 11 and by formula (I) PNG media_image7.png 176 428 media_image7.png Greyscale , wherein: A is CN, B is -O-(L1)m1-R8, L1 is -CRfRg-, Rf and Rg are H, m1 is 2, R8 is unsubstituted 7- or 10-membered fused heterobicyclic ring, or B is -NR10R11, R10 and R11 are selected from H and unsubstituted C3 alkyl, X1 and X2 are N, n is 1, and Z is methoxy. Claim 11 was found allowable. However, non-elected species within the aforementioned subgenus were not found allowable over the prior art; therefore, the search has not been further extended. Claims 7-9 and 16-21 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Priority This application is a 371 of PCT/CN2020/135934, filed on 12/11/2020, and claims priority to CN 201911266900.X, filed on 12/11/2019. On 10/28/2025, Applicant filed an English translation of the CN foreign application; thereby, perfecting the claim for foreign priority. The effective filing date of the claims is 12/11/2019. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because the Markush grouping of R10 and R11 ends with a “wherein” clause defining “substituted”, which clause contains a Markush grouping of alternative substituents. The last two substituents are not separated by “and”. This objection may be overcome by inserting “and” as indicated below: PNG media_image8.png 115 701 media_image8.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (1 of 2) Claims 1, 4, 5 and 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Xie et al. WO 2021/043209 A1 (earliest priority date: May 14, 2019) as evidenced by an English machine translation thereof (obtained on Aug. 11, 2026 from https://worldwide.espacenet.com). Xie et al. teach a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of claim 20, such as compound 1, PNG media_image9.png 233 496 media_image9.png Greyscale , or compound 2, PNG media_image10.png 318 380 media_image10.png Greyscale , “and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.” Xie (transl.) 25, claim 21. Several anticipatory compounds/compositions are disclosed in claim 21 and are too numerous to list. The composition comprising compound 1 or 2 anticipates the claimed embodiment outlined below: Claims 1, 4, 5 and 12-13 with respect to formula I PNG media_image7.png 176 428 media_image7.png Greyscale , wherein: A is CN, B is -O-(L1)m1-R8, L1 is -CRfRg-, Rf and Rg are H, m1 is 2, R8 is unsubstituted 7- or 10-membered fused heterobicyclic ring, X1 is CH, X2 is N, n is 1, and Z is methoxy. (2 of 2) Claims 1, 6 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Hong et al. WO 2021/088911 A1 (earliest priority date: Nov. 8, 2019) as evidenced by an English machine translation thereof (obtained on Aug. 11, 2026 from https://patentscope.wipo.int/). Hong teaches a compound of formula (I), PNG media_image11.png 382 216 media_image11.png Greyscale , and a pharmaceutical composition thereof “and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier”. See, e.g., Hong (transl.) para. 9, 10 and 73. Hong teaches compound I-7, PNG media_image12.png 236 146 media_image12.png Greyscale , as a species of formula (I). See, e.g., Hong (transl.) para. 183 and 290. The composition comprising compound I-7 anticipates the claimed embodiment outlined below: Claims 1, 6 and 12-13 with respect to formula I PNG media_image1.png 196 517 media_image1.png Greyscale , wherein: A is -CN, B is -NR10R11, R10 and R11 are selected from H and unsubstituted C3 alkyl, X1 is CH, X2 is N, Z is unsubstituted C1-alkoxy, and n is 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 11 is allowed. The closest art is cited above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMANDA L AGUIRRE whose telephone number is (571)272-5592. The examiner can normally be reached 10 am-6 pm MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JEFFREY H MURRAY can be reached on 571-272-0923. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMANDA L. AGUIRRE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1626
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 10, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Oct 28, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12605318
Synergistic Preservative/Personal Care Composition Containing an Alkylene Glycol Ester
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12590096
IMIDAZO[2,1-F][1,2,4]TRIAZIN-4-AMINE DERIVATIVES USED AS TLR8 AGONISTS
4y 1m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12570628
Salts of Obicetrapib and Processes for their Manufacture and Intermediates Thereof
11m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12552740
AMIDATED FATTY ACIDS AND DERIVATIVES THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12545678
BLUE THERMALLY ACTIVATED DELAYED FLUORESCENT EMITTERS AND HOSTS BASED ON FUNCTIONALIZED IMIDAZOLYL GROUPS
4y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+15.5%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 556 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month