Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/786,541

EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION BLOOD PUMP AND METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 17, 2022
Priority
Dec 18, 2019 — CN 201911310152.0 +1 more
Examiner
KLEIN, BENJAMIN JACOB
Art Unit
3700
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Shandong University
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
504 granted / 645 resolved
+8.1% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
5 currently pending
Career history
651
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
44.5%
+4.5% vs TC avg
§102
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 645 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see response, filed 5/5/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-12 under 35 U.S.C. §102(a)(1) over Akdis (US Pre Grant Publication 2011/0238172) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made under 35 U.S.C. §112(b). Drawings The drawings were received on 5/5/2025. These drawings are accepted. Claim Objections Claim 13 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 13, in line 10, “magnets is provided”, should read, “magnets are provided” In claim 13, in line 15, “magnets is circumferentially distributed”, should read, “magnets are circumferentially distributed” In claim 13, in line 19, “magnets is embedded”, should read, “magnets are embedded” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3-4, 7-11, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 13 recites the limitation "interiors" in line 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim The term “complex” in claim 7 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “complex impeller” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Specifically, it’s not clear how the word, “complex”, further limits the, “impeller”. Applicant is recommended to remove the word, “complex”, from the claim. The claims are additionally replete with grammatical and idiomatic errors. In an effort to best address those errors, the claims are re-drafted in a manner which best reflects the examiner’s understanding of the intended claim language and scope. Each of the amendments reflected in the drafted claim corresponds to language which is generally vague and indefinite. Examiner would note that the claim language below is an attempt by the examiner to present and examine claims with a clear and definite scope. Applicant is encouraged, but not required, to adopt the claim language below. Therefore, for the purpose of continued examination, and in order to promote clarity and compact prosecution, the claims will be interpreted as follows: 3. (Currently amended) The extracorporeal circulation blood pump according to claim 13, wherein the upper portion of the pump holder comprises a recess, an opening in a middle portion of the recess is provided for accommodating the pump housing configured to accommodate an upper surface of the pump body, and the electromagnet is circumferentially disposed at the opening on the upper portion of the pump holder. 4. (Currently amended) The extracorporeal circulation blood pump according to claim 13 wherein the interior of the lower portion of the pump holder is provided with a stepped recess, wherein a first step of the stepped recess 5-6. (Canceled) 7. (Currently amended) The extracorporeal circulation blood pump according to claim [[6]]13 wherein the rotator comprises an wherein the second radial support permanent magnet and the driven permanent magnets are disposed on a lower portion of the rotator. 8. (Previously presented) The extracorporeal circulation blood pump according to claim 7, wherein thethe pump configured such that blood flows from an inlet of the pump housing, through the round hole and rotating blades, into a flow channel in the pump housing, and out of an outlet of the pump housing. 9. (Currently amended) The extracorporeal circulation blood pump according to claim 7, wherein the lower portion of the rotator is further provided with a sealed chamber, the sealed chamber is a substantially toroidal structure provided in a rotational center of the rotator and having a round hole at its center, and the second radial support permanent magnet and the driven permanent magnets are both positioned inside the sealed chamber, wherein the second radial support permanent magnet is annular and is embedded on radially inward facing inner surface of the sealed chamber, and the driven permanent magnets are circumferentially embedded on a radially outward facing inner surface of the sealed chamber. 10. (Currently amended) The extracorporeal circulation blood pump according to claim 13, wherein the control mechanism further comprises a sensor; wherein the sensor is configured to sense a rotation of the rotator and provide sensed information to the control portion. 11. (Currently amended) The extracorporeal circulation blood pump according to claim 10, wherein the control portion generates control information through analysis and calculation according to the sensed information from the sensor, and controls the electromagnet through a control circuit, such that rotates without making contact with, and the first and second radial support permanent magnets. 12. (Canceled) 13. (New) An extracorporeal circulation blood pump, comprising: a pump holder, a pump body, a drive mechanism, and a control mechanism, wherein the pump holder comprises an upper portion and a lower portion wherein a fastener is provided on a second side of the pump holder, such that the upper portion is able to be freely opened and closed relative to the lower portion; wherein an interior an interior the lower portion define a cavity for accommodating the pump body; wherein when the upper portion is in an opened state relative to the lower portion, the pump body is able to be released from the cavity; wherein a plurality of first radial support permanent magnets is provided on the lower portion; wherein the pump body comprises a pump housing, and a rotator is provided in the pump housing; wherein a second radial support permanent magnet is disposed on an outer circumference of a lower end in the rotator and is configured to generate a repulsive force with the first radial support permanent magnets to enable a non-contact rotation of the rotator in a radial direction; and a plurality of driven permanent magnets is circumferentially distributed on the lower end in the rotator; wherein the drive mechanism, disposed at a bottom portion of the cavity, comprises a driving motor and a rotating disc, the driving motor is fixed on a bottom portion of the pump holderand the rotating disc is fixed on a top end of an output shaft of the driving motor; wherein a plurality of driving permanent magnets is embedded circumferentially on the rotating disc, are magnetically coupledprovide power to a rotation of the rotating disc, such that the rotator rotates without contact, wherein the control mechanism comprises a control portion and an electromagnet disposed on an upper portion of the pump holderconfigured wherein a magnitude of the attraction is controlled by the control portion. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-4, 7-11, and 13 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art of record is Nojiri et al. (US Patent No. 5,947,703), Wang et al. (CN 107670135 A), and Garzaniti et al. (US Patent No. 9,044,535). Nojiri et al. teaches a centrifugal blood pump having inter alia a pump holder (203/204) comprising an upper portion (203) and a lower portion (204), a pump body (202) comprising rotating impeller (223) and a plurality of driven magnets (227). Nojiri further teaches that the upper portion of the pump holder (See at least Figs. 24-27) is hinged around a rotating shaft (i.e. the implicit hinge pin) and having a fastener (255 and/or 253b) at the opposing side. Nojiri fails to teach at least first radial support permanent magnets, second radial support magnets, and a controller as claimed. Additionally, the upper and lower portions of the pump holder in Nojiri are not hinged to one another. Rather, the upper portion is split and hinged to itself. Wang et al. teaches a magnetically powered centrifugal pump and drive assembly having a pump holder which comprises a lower portion (6) and an upper portion (4), a pump body (1) having an impeller (unlabeled), a series of magnets (12) which function as both drive and first radial support magnets, and second radial support magnets (5212) on a stepped portion of the lower portion of the pump holder. Wang, however, at least fails to teach that the impeller (1) is magnetically suspended, or that it includes magnets/controller(s) in the upper portion of the pump holder. Rather the device of Wang is configured such that a first pivot (111) of the impeller rests on the second pivot (31) of an intermediate portion (3); the two pivots operating essentially as a bearing for the impeller (1). Additionally, Wang does not teach any element(s) which could reasonably be construed as a pump body, particularly since intermediate element (3) is fixed with respect to the pump holder portions (6) and (4). Garzaniti et al. teaches an extracorporeal blood pump with a disposable pump head portion and a magnetically levitated rotor. Garzaniti teaches the device comprising a pump holder (shown in a variety of embodiments under varying element number including as (12) in Fig 1; further see Figs. 16-17, and 19, respectively) comprising an upper portion (51 and 75/76), and a lower portion (50 and 78) wherein the portions are hinged with respect to one another to allow for removal of a pump body (pump head 11, See at least Fig. 6); the lower portion including driving magnets (18). The pump body includes an impeller (15) having a plurality of driven magnets (36) in a bottom surface and a magnetic portion on the upper surface (33) used to levitate the impeller. Additionally, Garzaniti teaches the upper portion of the pump holder comprising levitating magnets (22) and sensors which control the impeller position within the pump body. Garzaniti however, fails to teach at least the first plurality of radial support magnets, and the second plurality of radial support magnets as claimed. In the opinion of the examiner, even if it could be shown that each and every claimed element were present in the prior art as a whole, combining those elements from individual pieces of prior art would only be possible through impermissible hindsight. Each of the prior art devices cited above operates in a very specific manner to control the pump impeller and combining those features and control methods would require a substantial redesign of the components/devices/systems of the prior art. Therefore, the claims are allowable over the prior art of record. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN JACOB KLEIN whose telephone number is (571)270-5213. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00am - 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Moffat can be reached at 571-272-4390. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Benjamin J Klein/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 17, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 05, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741149
ANTI-TACHYCARDIA PACING CONTROL IN AN IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733876
EFFICIENTLY STORING DATA FOR WIDE DYNAMIC RANGE AND HIGH RESOLUTION BIOLOGICAL SIGNALS
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12721996
VIBRATORY NEUROMODULATION
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722002
MULTI-SITE TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF THE SPINAL CORD FOR FACILITATION OF LOCOMOTION
11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12714853
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ACTIVATION OF BRAIN REGIONS
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+20.0%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 645 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month