Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/787,465

COMPOSITE POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM ION BATTERY, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND USE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 20, 2022
Examiner
AKHTAR, KIRAN QURAISHI
Art Unit
1751
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Svolt Energy Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
59%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allow Rate
221 granted / 341 resolved
At TC average
Minimal -6% lift
Without
With
+-5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
362
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
59.8%
+19.8% vs TC avg
§102
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 341 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 11/13/25 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1, 4, 7, 8 & 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (CN 111146425) in view of Matsumura et al. WO 2019/146236 (see English US2020/0350626). With respect to claim 1, Wang et al. discloses a composite cathode material for a lithium-ion battery, comprising a cathode material core and a halide cladding layer cladded on the surface of the cathode material core, wherein the halide comprises Li3YBr6. [Abstract; 0030; 0035; Claim 5; 0040-0041] Wang et al. discloses wherein the halide is LiYCl6, and/or Li3YBr6. [Abstract] Wang et al. does not disclose wherein the content of Y element in the Li3YX6 is 0.1% to 1% based on 100% of the mass of the cathode material core. Matsumura et al. discloses a composite cathode material for a lithium-ion battery, comprising a cathode material core and a halide cladding layer cladded on the surface of the cathode material core [0111-0139], wherein the halide comprises Li3YX6 [Abstract], wherein X is at least one of halogens wherein the content of Y element in Li3YX6 is 0.1% to 0.3% based on 100% of the mass of the cathode material core. [0193-0197; 0227] Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art as of the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the cathode material of Wang et al. to include wherein the content of Y element in Li3YX6 is 0.1% to 1% based on 100% of the mass of the cathode material core, as disclosed in Matsumura et al., in order to allow for good charge/discharge characteristic. With respect to claim 4, Wang et al. discloses wherein the cathode material core comprises a lithium nickel manganate cathode material. [0010-0020] With respect to claim 7, Wang et al. does not disclose wherein the content of Y element in the Li3YX6 is 0.1% to 0.3% based on 100% of the mass of the cathode material core. Matsumura et al. discloses a composite cathode material for a lithium-ion battery, comprising a cathode material core and a halide cladding layer cladded on the surface of the cathode material core [0111-0139], wherein the halide comprises Li3YX6 [Abstract], wherein X is at least one of halogens wherein the content of Y element in Li3YX6 is 0.1% to 0.3% based on 100% of the mass of the cathode material core. [0193-0197; 0227] Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art as of the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the cathode material of Wang et al. to include wherein the content of Y element in Li3YX6 is 0.1% to 0.3% based on 100% of the mass of the cathode material core, as disclosed in Matsumura et al., in order to allow for good charge/discharge characteristic. With respect to claim 8, Wang et al. does not disclose wherein the cathode material core has a particle size D50 of 1µm to 5 µm. Matsumura et al. discloses a composite cathode material for a lithium-ion battery, comprising a cathode material core and a halide cladding layer cladded on the surface of the cathode material core [0111-0139], wherein the halide comprises Li3YX6 [Abstract], wherein X is at least one of halogens, wherein the cathode material core has a particle size D50 of 1µm to 5 µm. [0135-0138] Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art as of the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the cathode material of Wang et al. to include wherein the cathode material core has a particle size D50 of 1µm to 5 µm, as disclosed in Matsumura et al., in order to allow for good charge/discharge characteristic. With respect to claim 10, Wang et al. discloses wherein the Li3YX6 has a particle size D50 of 5 nm to 500 nm. [0036; 0011] Claim(s) 3 & 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (CN 111146425) ) in view of Matsumura et al. WO 2019/146236 (see English US2020/0350626) as applied to claims 1 & 4 above in further view of Ko et al. (“A Co-free layered LiN0.7Mn0.3O2 cathode material for high-energy and long-life lithium-ion batteries”) With respect to claim 3, Wang et al. does not disclose wherein the cathode material core comprises a cobalt-free cathode material. Ko et al. discloses a composite cathode material for a lithium-ion battery, comprising a cathode material core wherein the cathode material core comprises a cobalt-free cathode material. [Pages 96-101] Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art as of the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the cathode material of Wang et al. to include a cobalt-free cathode material, as disclosed in Ko et al., in order to allow for long life and high energy. With respect to claim 5, Wang et al. discloses wherein the lithium nickel manganate cathode material has a chemical formula of LiNixMnyO2, wherein x is greater than or equal to 0.55 and less than or equal to 0.95. [0010-0020] Wang et al. does not disclose wherein y is greater than or equal to 0.05 and less than or equal to 0.45. Ko et al. discloses a lithium nickel manganate cathode material has a chemical formula of LiNixMnyO2, wherein x is greater than or equal to 0.55 and less than or equal to 0.95 and wherein y is greater than or equal to 0.05 and less than or equal to 0.45. [Abstract; Pages 96-101] Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art as of the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the cathode material of Wang et al. to include a cobalt-free cathode material, as disclosed in Ko et al., in order to allow for long life and high energy. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIRAN QURAISHI AKHTAR whose telephone number is (571)270-7589. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9AM-7PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Leong can be reached at 571-270-1292. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KIRAN QURAISHI AKHTAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1751
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 30, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 08, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 13, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586857
BATTERY MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580199
ELECTROLYTIC COPPER FOIL PROOF AGAINST TEAR OR WRINKLE DEFECTS, ELECTRODE COMPRISING SAME, SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING SAME, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12562424
BATTERY PACK CASE INCLUDING OVER-FUSION PREVENTION STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12562427
BATTERY WIRING MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12548839
BATTERY STORAGE DEVICE AND OILING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
59%
With Interview (-5.5%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 341 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month