Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/789,992

MELT BONDING PREVENTION METHOD AND BATTERY SYSTEM APPLIED WITH THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 29, 2022
Examiner
DIAO, M BAYE
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1247 granted / 1424 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1464
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1424 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Acknowledgement is made of reply filed on 10/17/2025 in which Applicant's election with traverse of claims 1-8 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the application is a 371. This is found persuasive and the restriction has been withdrawn. Claims 1-12 are now pending in the application and will be examined. Response to Preliminary Amendment Acknowledgement is made of preliminary amendment filed on 6/29/2022 in which claims 1-2 and 9 have been amended while claims 3-8,10-12 remain as originally presented. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Acknowledgment is made of Applicant's benefit claim to International ApplicationPCT/KR2021/0073100, filed on 19 June 2021, of which this Application is a National Stage entry. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 06/29/2022, 08/09/2023, 11/14/2023, 06/10/2025 and 08/19/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner and placed of record. Initialed copies are attached herewith. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1,2,4-5,8,9 and 12 are rejected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 recites the underlined limitations of, “…receive a power voltage from an external lead-acid battery…” in lines 11 and 13 of claim 1 and lines 4,6,10 and 13 of claim 9, in lines 3 and 5 of claim 2, in line 2 of claim 4, in line 2 of claim 5 and in line 2 of claim 8. It is unclear as to what is meant by “power voltage” since the two(i.e. “power” and “voltage”) are different concepts and they refer to two different quantities since power is the rate of energy transfer and is equal to voltage multiply by current whereas voltage is energy per unit charge or electrical pressure or potential difference and thus render the claims indefinite. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-12 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The prior art of record either taken alone or in combination thereof fails to teach or reasonably suggest, among other patentable features, assuming the corrected wordings suggested supra in claim 1, As in claim 1:“…a battery management system controlling charging and discharging of the battery, and controlling the first main relay, the pre-charge relay, and the second main relay, wherein the first main relay, the pre-charge relay, the second main relay, and the battery management system receive a power supply voltage from an external lead-acid battery, and wherein the battery management system opens the first main relay, the pre-charge relay, and the second main relay when the power supply voltage is a predetermined reference voltage or less, closes the pre-charge relay and the second main relay to execute a pre-charge when the power voltage is higher than the reference voltage”. As in claim 9: “…a method comprising: determining whether a power voltage is less than or equal to a predetermined reference voltage by using a detection signal that is an output of the SR latch; opening the first and second main relays and the pre-charge relay when the power voltage is less than or equal to the reference voltage according to a determination result of the determining; closing the pre-charge relay and the second main relay to perform a pre-charge when the power supply voltage is higher than the reference voltage after the opening; closing the first main relay after the pre-charge is completed; and opening the pre-charge relay after closing the first main relay, wherein the power supply voltage is a voltage supplied to the first and second main relays and the pre-charge relay”. Claims 2-8,10-12 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Examiner found US 2012/0169117 A1 to Park to be the closest prior art of record in which a battery system and an electric vehicle including the battery system are disclosed. Park teaches and shows in Fig. 1 a battery system(1) comprising: a battery(20a) including a plurality of battery cells(21); a first main relay(50) connected between one electrode(positive electrode via current sensor 30) and a first output terminal(output at the inverter 60) of the battery(20a)(see [0046]); a pre-charge relay (51)connected to the first main relay(50) in parallel(see Fig. 1); a second main relay(52) connected between another electrode(negative electrode) and a second output terminal of the battery(20a); and a battery management system(BMS 10a) controlling(via ECU 40) charging and discharging of the battery(20a), and controlling the first main relay(50), the pre-charge relay(51), and the second main relay(52). However, Park does not teach the limitations of, “wherein the first main relay, the pre-charge relay, the second main relay, and the battery management system receive a power voltage from an external lead-acid battery, and wherein the battery management system opens the first main relay, the pre-charge relay, and the second main relay when the power supply voltage is a predetermined reference voltage or less, closes the pre-charge relay and the second main relay to execute a pre-charge when the power supply voltage is higher than the reference voltage or more, and closes the first main relay after the pre-charge is completed”. Instead, Park discloses, that the main switch 33 turns on or off the battery 20a based on a control signal of the BMS 10a or the ECU 40 if an abnormal condition is created such as an overvoltage(more than the reference voltage), an overcurrent, or a high temperature. Park further teaches that the first main relay 50 is turned on(relay is closed as opposed to the instant application) when the auxiliary relay 51 is transitioned from an on state to an off state, thereby supplying power stored in the battery 20a to the inverter 60 whereas the instant application closes the pre-charge relay(which was previously in an Off state)(which corresponds to Park’s auxiliary relay 51) and the second main relay to execute a pre-charge when the power supply voltage is higher than the reference voltage, and closes the first main relay after the pre-charge is completed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to M'BAYE DIAO whose telephone number is (571)272-6127. The examiner can normally be reached M-F; 9:00AM-6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DREW A DUNN can be reached at 571-272-2312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. M'BAYE DIAO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2859 /M BAYE DIAO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859 November 5, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2022
Application Filed
Nov 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600265
POWER SUPPLY DEVICE, ELECTRIC VEHICLE PROVIDED WITH POWER SUPPLY DEVICE, AND POWER STORAGE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601790
Battery Parameter Estimation Apparatus and Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600258
MANAGEMENT OF CHARGING REQUESTS TO AVOID SECURITY ISSUES AND SERVICING DELAYS ACROSS CHARGING STATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594854
BATTERY CONTROL SYSTEM, BATTERY CONTROL METHOD AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589665
PEER-TO-PEER DC FAST CHARGING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+3.4%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1424 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month