Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/790,961

COLLAGEN 1 TRANSLATION INHIBITORS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 06, 2022
Priority
Jan 30, 2020 — provisional 62/967,645 +1 more
Examiner
ISMAIL, REHANA
Art Unit
1625
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Anima Biotech Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
60 granted / 76 resolved
+18.9% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
121
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
§102
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
§112
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 76 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Examiner have withdrawn 112 and 102 rejection on record. This office action is a Non-final due to examiner error for applying non complaint species to the claim. Applicant provided complaint species election of PNG media_image1.png 773 629 media_image1.png Greyscale Examiner did not find prior art on applicant elected species. Therefore, Markush search was extended to the species PNG media_image2.png 187 438 media_image2.png Greyscale , where in ring A is aromatic ring, PNG media_image3.png 147 130 media_image3.png Greyscale substituted with R1 and R2, wherein R1 is H(n is 4) and R2 is OH(m is 1); Ring B is C3 non-aromatic heterocyclic ring PNG media_image4.png 93 82 media_image4.png Greyscale , substituted with R3 wherein R3 is PNG media_image5.png 82 97 media_image5.png Greyscale (unsubstituted aryl); R5 H; R6 and R7 are independently H; Q1 is NH; Q2 is C(R) wherein R is H; G=X is C=O; X6, X7, X8, X14 and X14 are C. This search retrieved prior art. Therefore, the Markush search will not be extended unnecessarily to additional species in this Office Action following Markush search practices. The Markush search extended species reads on Claims 54-55, 58-60 and 64-74. Claims 56-57, 61-63 and 75 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on6/11/2025. Claims 54-55, 58-60 and 64-74 are examined in this office action Current Status of 17/790,961 This office action is in response to the amended claims on 08/27/2025. Claims 54-55, 58-60 and 64-74 are examined in this office action. Priority The effective filing date is 01/30/2020 since the instant claims find support in provision applicant no 62/967,645. Response to Arguments Examiner acknowledges the receipt of applicant’s claim amendment and remarks of August 27th 2025.Examiner have reviewed these remarks and amendments. Regarding 112 amended claim 54 and 60 by defining G=X as C=O, C=S, S=O, or SO2 thus overcoming 112 rejections. Therefore 112 rejection is withdrawn. Regarding 102 rejection, Applicant argues: the compound PNG media_image6.png 190 416 media_image6.png Greyscale wherein R5 is defined as NHR where are is a cycloalkyl is not defined by the claim thus is not claimed. Examiner’s response: Examiner agrees with applicant’s traversal, therefore 102 rejection is withdrawn. New Rejections Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 54-55, 58-59, and 60 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ando et.al. (US 2004/0204409). Ando et.al. discloses the compound PNG media_image2.png 187 438 media_image2.png Greyscale ( N-(2-amino-4-cyanophenyl)-2-phenylacetamide) (page 23, example 1B paragraph [0363]) where in ring A is aromatic ring, PNG media_image3.png 147 130 media_image3.png Greyscale substituted with R1 and R2, wherein R1 is H(n is 4) and R2 is OH(m is 1); Ring B is C3 non-aromatic heterocyclic ring PNG media_image4.png 93 82 media_image4.png Greyscale , substituted with R3 wherein R3 is PNG media_image5.png 82 97 media_image5.png Greyscale (unsubstituted aryl); R5 H; R6 and R7 are independently H; Q1 is NH; Q2 is C(R) wherein R is H; and G=X is C=O thus anticipating claims 54-55 and 60. The limitation “the compound is a collagen translation inhibitor” is interpreted as an inherent property/function. Per MPEP 2112.01(I) and (II): “if the structure recited in the prior art is substantially identical to that of the instant claims, then properties/function of the instantly claimed compound are deemed inherent and anticipated by the prior art reference”. Thus, the ANDO prior art reference anticipates instant claim 58. Also, the ANDO Abstract and paragraph [0032] teaches pharmaceutical compositions of the compounds with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, therefore anticipating instant claim 59. Conclusion Claims 54-55 and 58-60 are rejected. Claims 64-74 are objected to for depending on rejected claim 54. Examiner found more structure corresponding to formula (I) of claims 54 and 60 where claims 58-59 and 64-74 can be rejected in future Final office action. Please note compound PNG media_image2.png 187 438 media_image2.png Greyscale is an intermediate in the prior art. Therefore claim 59 was not rejected because PNG media_image2.png 187 438 media_image2.png Greyscale is not in a pharmaceutical composition. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Rehana Ismail whose telephone number is (703)756-4776. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrew D Kosar can be reached at (571)272-913. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /R.I./Examiner, Art Unit 1625 /JOHN S KENYON/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1625
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 06, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 27, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12624382
BETA-LACTAM COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
5y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12612407
IMIDAZO[2,1-F][1,2,4]TRIAZIN-4-AMINE DERIVATIVES AS TLR7 AGONIST
4y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12599613
COMPOSITION COMPRISING DUTASTERIDE
4y 10m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599555
FORMULATION
4y 0m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593844
METHOD AND COMPOUNDS TO INDUCE PLANT TOLERANCE AGAINST ARTHROPOD PESTS
4y 10m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.2%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 76 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month