Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/791,057

METHOD FOR PERFORMING A HANDOVER BETWEEN A FIRST CELL AND A SECOND CELL, USER EQUIPMENT AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 06, 2022
Examiner
BHATTI, HASHIM S
Art Unit
2475
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
OA Round
6 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
340 granted / 396 resolved
+27.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
423
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
§112
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 396 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5 and 19-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lin US 2018/020472 A1 in view of Tang et al. US 2018/0213457 A1 and Chuberre et al. US 2017/0245185 A1. Claims 1, 5 and 21: Lin discloses a method implemented by a user equipment for performing a handover between a first cell and a second cell (See fig. 6, UE performing handover from source eNB to a target eNB) in a network comprising a satellite communication network, the first cell and the second cell being supported by one or more satellites of the satellite communication network, the first cell corresponding to a first base station and the second cell corresponding to a second base station, at least the first cell being supported by a non-geostationary orbit satellite of the satellite communication network (“satellite” and “non-geostationary satellite” are not given any patentable weight because these features are not part of the claim’s body and are not essential in performing the following steps), the method comprising: determining, before the user equipment transmits a first signal to the second base station, a value to be used as a timing advance in the second cell (See fig. 6 and paras 39-44, in step 5 UE receives TA value from the source eNB), the value to be used as a timing advance in the second cell being determined based on: - a data related to timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell received from the first base station or from a base station to which the user equipment has been connected before being connected to the first base station (See fig. 6 and paras 39-44, in step 5 UE receives TA value from the source eNB which it has received it from the target eNB), or - a value used as a timing advance in the first cell when no data related to timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell is received from the first base station or from a base station to which the user equipment has been connected before being connected to the first base station; performing an uplink transmission with the second base station using the value to be used as a timing advance in the second cell (See fig. 6. Step 6, UE sending first uplink packet). data related to timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell comprises at least one among: data informing the user equipment that the value to be used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell is different from the value used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the first cell (See claims 17 and 18, “receive parameters including time advance information of the user equipment from the target access node; and provide the parameters to the user equipment…the time advance information comprises at least one a timing offset…”. The offset corresponds to different value in reference to the value used as in the first cell), when the first cell and the second cell are not supported by a same satellite of the satellites in the satellite communication network. With regards to claims 5/21, a processor; and a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions stored thereon, which when executed by the processor (See fig. 8, processor and memory). Lin doesn’t disclose data informing the user equipment that the value to be used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell is the same as a value used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the first cell. Tang disclose data informing the user equipment that the value to be used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell is the same as a value used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the first cell (See paras 392-393, “sends the TA indication information to the UE by using the source cell… the target cell determines that the TA indication information is first indication information indicating that a TA of the target cell is the same as a TA of the source cell”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Lin with the teachings of Tang to improve the method disclosed by Lin by including the feature of same TA values. The motivation to combine would have been to avoid any delays in communication. Lin doesn’t disclose that the first cell and the second cell are supported by satellites of the satellite communication network, and at least the first cell is supported by a non-geostationary orbit satellite of the satellite communication network. Chuberre discloses that the first cell and the second cell are supported by satellites of the satellite communication network, and at least the first cell is supported by a non-geostationary orbit satellite of the satellite communication network (See para 200, “satellites in non-geostationary orbit NGSO, included in the range of satellites ranging from nano-satellites to mini-satellites through macro-satellites, can be used with nongeostationary satellite cells on the ground”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Lin with the teachings of Tang to improve the method disclosed by Lin by including the feature of first and second cell being supported by nongeostationary satellite. The motivation to combine would have been to allow flexibility in coverage and connectivity. Claim 2: Lin discloses data related to timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell comprises at least one among: data related to a value to be used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell (See fig. 6 and paras 39-44, in step 5 UE receives TA value from the source eNB which has received it from the target eNB). Claim 3: Lin discloses data related to a value to be used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell comprises at least one among: - data corresponding to a value (See fig. 6 and paras 39-44, in step 5 UE receives TA value from the source eNB which has received it from the target eNB), - data corresponding to an offset from a value used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the first cell; - data corresponding to an offset from a generic value. Claim 4: Lin discloses that the uplink transmission performed with the second base station is a first uplink transmission performed with the second base station (See fig. 6. Step 6, UE sending first uplink packet). Claims 19 and 20: Lin discloses a method for managing a handover of a user equipment between a first cell and a second cell in a network comprising a satellite communication network, the first cell and the second cell (See fig. 6, UE performing handover from source eNB to a target eNB) being supported by one or more satellites of the satellite communication network, the first cell corresponding to a first base station and the second cell corresponding to a second base station, at least the first cell being supported by a non-geostationary orbit satellite of the satellite communication network (“satellite” and “non-geostationary satellite” are not given any patentable weight because these features are not part of the claim’s body and are not essential in performing the following steps), the method comprising: determining a value to be used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell (See fig. 6 and paras 39-44, in step 4, the source eNB receives TA value from the target eNB); transmitting to the second base station and/or the user equipment, before the second base station receives any signal from the user equipment, the value to be used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell (See fig. 6 and paras 39-44, in step 5 source eNB sends TA value which it has received it from the target eNB); data related to timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell comprises at least one among: data informing the user equipment that the value to be used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell is different from the value used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the first cell (See claims 17 and 18, “receive parameters including time advance information of the user equipment from the target access node; and provide the parameters to the user equipment…the time advance information comprises at least one a timing offset…”. The offset corresponds to different value in reference to the value used as in the first cell). With regards to claim 20, a processor; and a non-transitory computer-readable medium (See fig. 8, processor and memory). Lin doesn’t disclose data informing the user equipment that the value to be used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell is the same as a value used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the first cell. Tang disclose data informing the user equipment that the value to be used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the second cell is the same as a value used as a timing advance of the user equipment in the first cell (See paras 392-393, “sends the TA indication information to the UE by using the source cell… the target cell determines that the TA indication information is first indication information indicating that a TA of the target cell is the same as a TA of the source cell”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Lin with the teachings of Tang to improve the method disclosed by Lin by including the feature of same TA values. The motivation to combine would have been to avoid any delays in communication. Lin doesn’t disclose that the first cell and the second cell are supported by satellites of the satellite communication network, and at least the first cell is supported by a non-geostationary orbit satellite of the satellite communication network. Chuberre discloses that the first cell and the second cell are supported by satellites of the satellite communication network, and at least the first cell is supported by a non-geostationary orbit satellite of the satellite communication network (See para 200, “satellites in non-geostationary orbit NGSO, included in the range of satellites ranging from nano-satellites to mini-satellites through macro-satellites, can be used with nongeostationary satellite cells on the ground”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Lin with the teachings of Tang to improve the method disclosed by Lin by including the feature of first and second cell being supported by nongeostationary satellite. The motivation to combine would have been to allow flexibility in coverage and connectivity. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6 and 8-18 allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 5 & 19-21 filed on 02/24/2026 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HASHIM S BHATTI whose telephone number is (571)270-7748. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9:00am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Khaled Kassim can be reached on 571-270-3770. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HASHIM S. BHATTI Primary Examiner Art Unit 2472 /HASHIM S BHATTI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2472
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 06, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 19, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 22, 2024
Response Filed
Dec 12, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 20, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 20, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 13, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 07, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 06, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Oct 24, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 24, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 07, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 30, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 30, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 24, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597984
METHODS, APPARATUS AND MACHINE-READABLE MEDIA RELATING TO CHANNEL ESTIMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593236
INTELLIGENT ADAPTIVE MEASUREMENT GAPS FOR LOW MOBILITY USER EQUIPMENT (UEs)
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587919
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO FACILITATE SERVICE CONTINUITY FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM HANDOVERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580641
CONFIGURATION FOR INTER-SATELLITE LINK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581493
DOWNLINK SIZE ESTIMATION FOR MULTICAST TRAFFIC
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 396 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month