Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 17/791,359

DISPENSER

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 07, 2022
Examiner
MEHTA, BHISMA
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
197 granted / 328 resolved
-9.9% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+44.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
389
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
37.9%
-2.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 328 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/07/2022 was considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the projection of said central nozzle" in lines 11-12. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the projection of which on said plane perpendicular to said axis" in lines 14-15. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the projection on said plane perpendicular to said axis" in line 16. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the projection on said first frontal median plane" in lines 1-4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 3 recites the limitation "the projection on said plane perpendicular to said axis" in lines 1-2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 4 recites the limitation "the projection of which on said plane perpendicular to said axis" in lines 2-3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 4 recites the limitation "the projection on said plane perpendicular to said axis" in lines 4-5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 5 recites the limitation "the projection of which on said plane perpendicular to said axis" in lines 2-3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the at least one second lateral duct" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the projection on said first frontal median plane" in lines 3-4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 7 recites the limitation "the projection on said plane perpendicular to said axis" in lines 1-2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Mezzoli (US 6228070). Regarding Claim 1, Mezzoli discloses a liquid dispenser (Fig.2A) for medical uses wherein a first membrane body (2) is shaped symmetrically with respect to a first front median plane (see annotated figure below) and to a second sagittal median plane (see annotated figure below) intersected in a central axis (see annotated figure below) (the first membrane body 2 is shaped symmetrically with respect to the first front median plane and the second sagittal median plane wherein the first front median plane and the second sagittal median plane intersect at the central axis as seen annotated figure below) and is delimited at the top by a dome (see annotated figure below); an extension of said first body (2) according to said second sagittal median plane being greater than an extension of said first body (2) according to said first front median plane (the extension of the first membrane body 2 is greater at the second sagittal median plane than the first front median plane as in annotated figure below); a second body (4d) being carried by said first body (2) inside said dome in a concentric position to said axis (Figs.2A-2D); said second body (4d) having a lower hollow portion (see annotated figure below) (the second body 4d is hollow, since fluid passes to connect holes 4a-c with conduction 5) (lines 33-37 in column 5) concentric with said axis (Figs.2A-D) and an upper portion (see annotated figure below) that has a central duct (lumen within upper portion where fluid passes; see annotated figure below) and at least a first lateral duct (see annotated figure below) ending in said dome (Fig.2A), respectively, with a central nozzle (see annotated figure below) and at least a first lateral nozzle (4c); characterized in that the projection of said central nozzle on a plane perpendicular to said axis has an oval or rectangular shape (Fig.2c), in that said central nozzle (4b) has a first lateral portion (see annotated figure below) the projection of which on said plane perpendicular to said axis extends laterally with respect to said second sagittal median plane (the first lateral portion extends lateral with respect to the second sagittal median plane; extends away from the central axis as seen in annotated figures below), and in that the projection on said plane perpendicular to said axis of said at least one first lateral nozzle (4c) is positioned entirely laterally with respect to said second sagittal median plane (Fig.2A). PNG media_image1.png 415 821 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 500 738 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 958 1098 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 632 1078 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 2, Mezzoli discloses the dispenser according to claim 1, and further discloses characterized in that the projection on said first frontal median plane of said at least one first lateral duct is at least partially overlapping the projection on said first frontal median plane of said central duct (see annotated figure below). Regarding Claim 3, Mezzoli discloses the dispenser according to claim 1, and further discloses characterized in that the projection on said plane perpendicular to the axis of said at least one first lateral nozzle has an oval or rectangular shape (Fig.2c). Regarding Claim 4, Mezzoli discloses the dispenser according to claim 1, and further discloses characterized in that said central nozzle has a second lateral portion (see annotated figure below), the projection of which on said plane perpendicular to said axis extends laterally with respect to said second sagittal median plane and symmetrically with respect to said projection on said plane perpendicular to said axis of said first portion (see annotated figure below) of central nozzle (the second lateral portion extends lateral with respect to the second sagittal median plane; extends away from the central axis and symmetrical to the PNG media_image5.png 628 827 media_image5.png Greyscale firs lateral portion as seen in annotated figures below). Regarding Claim 5, Mezzoli discloses the dispenser according to claim 4, and further discloses characterized in that said dispenser comprises a second lateral duct (see annotated figure below) ending in said dome with a second lateral nozzle (4a), the projection of which on said plane perpendicular to said axis is positioned entirely laterally with respect to said second sagittal median plane (Fig.2A). PNG media_image6.png 597 706 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 632 818 media_image7.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 6, Mezzoli discloses the dispenser according to claim 4, and further discloses characterized in that the projection on said first frontal median plane of said at least one second lateral duct at least partially overlaps the projection on said first frontal median plane of said central duct (see annotated figure below). Regarding Claim 7, Mezzoli discloses the dispenser according to claim 5, and further discloses characterized in that the projection on said plane perpendicular to the axis of said at least one second lateral nozzle has an oval or rectangular shape (Fig.2c). Regarding Claim 8, Mezzoli discloses the dispenser according to claim 1, and further discloses characterized in that said central nozzle is flared and has a section increasing towards said dome (the central nozzle is flared towards the dome as seen in Fig.2A). Regarding Claim 9, Mezzoli discloses the dispenser according to claim 5, and further discloses characterized in that said first and second lateral ducts are developed on parallel planes (the first and second lateral ducts are symmetrical; therefore, they are developed on parallel planes Fig.2A). Regarding Claim 10, Mezzoli discloses the dispenser according to claim 1, and further discloses characterized in that said dome has externally at least one discharge groove (lines 43-56 in column 4). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TANIA M ISMAIL whose telephone number is (313)446-6625. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:00-3:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bhisma Mehta can be reached at 571-272-3383. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.I./ Examiner, Art Unit 3783 /BHISMA MEHTA/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 07, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 9999752
MULTI-CONDUIT BALLOON CATHETER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 19, 2018
Patent 9662038
FLUID DRIVEN MEDICAL INJECTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted May 30, 2017
Patent 8784400
DEVICES FOR DELIVERING SUBSTANCES THROUGH AN EXTRA-ANATOMIC OPENING CREATED IN AN AIRWAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 22, 2014
Patent 8721628
MEDICAL COUPLING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted May 13, 2014
Patent 8652096
COMPRESSIBLE MULTI-CHAMBER FEEDING TUBE DELIVERY DEVICE AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 18, 2014
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+44.5%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 328 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month