Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/791,507

LOCALIZATION OF COMPONENTS IN A COMPONENT COMMUNITY

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 07, 2022
Examiner
PINKNEY, DAWAYNE
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
View Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
1378 granted / 1704 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
1754
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
§102
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1704 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 6-9, 69-71 and 73-79 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Khong et al. (US 2017/0030995) in view of Reede et al. (US 2012/0032855). Regarding claim 1, Khong discloses, a method of locating a transceiver (Figs. 1-2c), the method comprising: (a) using a coordinator transceiver (7) to coordinate transmission of a plurality of signals by a plurality of transceivers (Para. 0002, lines 1-8 and see 8, 9, 10, 11) that includes the coordinator transceiver, a first transceiver and a second transceiver; (b) using the first transceiver (8) to transmit a first signal at a first time scheduled by the coordinator transceiver (Para. 0002); and (c) using the second transceiver (11) to sense the first signal at a second time to facilitate determination of a location of the first transceiver relative to the second transceiver (Para. 0002 and 0004; note, discloses using TOF signals to determine distance and location of second transceiver 11). Khong does not disclose the first signal comprises location data; wherein the location data comprises an angle; and wherein the angle is an angle between two transceivers. Reede teaches, from the same field of endeavor that in a method of locating a transceiver that it would have been desirable to make the first signal comprises location data; wherein the location data comprises an angle (Para. 0098); and wherein the angle is an angle between two transceivers (Para. 0098). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the first signal comprises location data; wherein the location data comprises an angle; and wherein the angle is an angle between two transceivers as taught by the method of locating a transceiver of Reede in the method of locating a transceiver of Khong since Reede teaches it is known to include these features in a method of locating a transceiver for the purpose of providing an accurate and effective method of locating a transceiver. Regarding claims 2 and 70, Khong in view of Reede discloses and teaches as set forth above, and Khong further discloses, the plurality of transceivers are stationary and are disposed in a facility, and wherein the plurality of transceivers are configured to locate a transitory transceiver in the facility (Para. 0004, lines 1-9; note, discloses a plurality of transceivers located in a building/warehouse). Regarding claim 3, Khong in view of Reede discloses and teaches as set forth above, and Khong further discloses, at least one transceiver of the plurality of transceivers is disposed in a housing (see Figs. 2a-c) comprising (i) sensors or (ii) a sensor and an emitter (Para. 0018; note, discloses “target transceiver 2” receives “TOF initialization transmission 3” with a sensor and emits “TOF response transmission 4”). Regarding claims 4 and 71, Khong in view of Reede discloses and teaches as set forth above, and Khong further discloses, the plurality of transceivers are operatively coupled to a network of a facility in which the plurality of transceivers are disposed (Para. 0004, lines 1-9; note, discloses a network of a facility that includes a plurality of transceivers located in a building/warehouse). Regarding claims 6 and 73, Khong in view of Reede discloses and teaches as set forth above, and Khong further discloses, the coordinator transceiver coordinates transmission of a second signal by the second transceiver (Para. 0002). Regarding claims 7 and 74, Khong in view of Reede discloses and teaches as set forth above, and Khong further discloses, the first signal comprises identification data and/or time data (Para. 0018 and “4” of Fig. 1; note, discloses “TOF response transmission”). Regarding claims 8 and 75, Khong in view of Reede discloses and teaches as set forth above, and Khong further discloses, the location data comprises a distance (Para. 0002 and 0004), the distance comprises a distance between two transceivers (Para. 0002 and 0004). Regarding claims 9 and 76, Khong in view of Reede discloses and teaches as set forth above, and Khong further discloses, the time and/or location data is utilized to find a topology of the plurality of transceivers (Para. 0002 and 0004). Regarding claim 69, Khong discloses, an apparatus (Figs. 1-2c), comprising: at least one controller comprising circuitry, the at least one controller being configured to: (a) operatively couple to a coordinator transceiver (7) and to a plurality of transceivers (Para. 0002, lines 1-8 and see 8, 9, 10, 11); (b) use, or direct use of, a coordinator transceiver to coordinate transmission of a plurality of signals by a plurality of transceivers (Para. 0002 and 0004; note, discloses using TOF signals to determine distance and location of second transceiver 11) that includes the coordinator transceiver, a first transceiver (8) and a second transceiver (11); (c) use, or direct use of, the first transceiver (8) to transmit a first signal at a first time scheduled by the coordinator transceiver (Para. 0002); and (d) use, or direct use of, the second transceiver (11) to sense the first signal at a second time to facilitate determination of a location of the first transceiver relative to the second transceiver (Para. 0002 and 0004; note, discloses using TOF signals to determine distance and location of the first and second transceivers). Khong does not disclose the first signal comprises location data; wherein the location data comprises an angle; and wherein the angle is an angle between two transceivers. Reede teaches, from the same field of endeavor that in an apparatus that it would have been desirable to make the first signal comprises location data; wherein the location data comprises an angle (Para. 0098); and wherein the angle is an angle between two transceivers (Para. 0098). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the first signal comprises location data; wherein the location data comprises an angle; and wherein the angle is an angle between two transceivers as taught by the apparatus of Reede in the apparatus of Khong since Reede teaches it is known to include these features in an apparatus for the purpose of providing an accurate and effective apparatus. Regarding claim 77, Khong discloses, a non-transitory computer readable medium for locating a transceiver (Figs. 1-2c), the non-transitory computer readable medium comprises program instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to execute operations comprising: (a) using, or directing use of, a coordinator transceiver (7) to coordinate transmission of a plurality of signals (Para. 0002 and 0004; note, discloses using TOF signals to determine distance and location of second transceiver 11) by a plurality of transceivers (Para. 0002, lines 1-8 and see 8, 9, 10, 11) that includes the coordinator transceiver, a first transceiver (8) and a second transceiver (11); (b) using, or directing use of, the first transceiver (8) to transmit a first signal at a first time scheduled by the coordinator transceiver (Para. 0002); and (c) using, or directing use of, the second transceiver (11) to sense the first signal at a second time to facilitate determination of a location of the first transceiver relative to the second transceiver (Para. 0002 and 0004; note, discloses using TOF signals to determine distance and location of second transceiver 11). Khong does not disclose the first signal comprises location data; wherein the location data comprises an angle; and wherein the angle is an angle between two transceivers. Reede teaches, from the same field of endeavor that in an apparatus that it would have been desirable to make the first signal comprises location data; wherein the location data comprises an angle (Para. 0098); and wherein the angle is an angle between two transceivers (Para. 0098). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the first signal comprises location data; wherein the location data comprises an angle; and wherein the angle is an angle between two transceivers as taught by the apparatus of Reede in the apparatus of Khong since Reede teaches it is known to include these features in an apparatus for the purpose of providing an accurate and effective apparatus. Regarding claim 78, Khong in view of Reede discloses and teaches as set forth above, and Khong further discloses, the operations further comprise using, or directing use of, the coordinator transceiver (11) to coordinate transmission of a second signal by the second transceiver to determine of the location of the second transceiver with respect to at least one other transceiver of the plurality of transceivers (Para. 0002 and 0004; note, discloses using TOF signals to determine distance and location of the first and second transceivers). Regarding claim 79, Khong in view of Reede discloses and teaches as set forth above, and Khong further discloses, the location data comprises a distance and the distance comprises a distance between two transceivers (Para. 0002 and 0004), and wherein the time and/or location data is utilized to find a topology of the plurality of transceivers (Para. 0018 and “4” of Fig. 1; note, discloses “TOF response transmission”). Claims 5 and 72 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Khong et al. (US 2017/0030995) in view of Reede et al. (US 2012/0032855) as applied to claims 4 and 71 above, and further in view of Gherardi et al. (US 2019/0058977; already of record). Khong in view of Reede remains as applied to claims 4 and 72 above. Khong in view of Reede does not disclose the network (i) is configured to facilitate power and data communication on a single cable, (ii) is configured to facilitate at least a third generation, fourth generation or fifth generation cellular communication, (iii) comprises at least a portion that is a first network installed in the facility, (iv) comprises at least a portion disposed in an envelope of the facility, (v) is configured to facilitate control of the facility, (vi) is configured to facilitate media communication, data communication, cellular communication, and power communication, (vii) comprises a coaxial cable, an optical cable, and/or a twisted wire and/or (vii) comprises wired and/or wireless communication. Gherardi teaches, from the same field of endeavor that in a method of locating a transceiver that it would have been desirable to make the network (i) is configured to facilitate power and data communication on a single cable (Para. 0079), (ii) is configured to facilitate at least a third generation, fourth generation or fifth generation cellular communication (Para. 0090), (iii) comprises at least a portion that is a first network installed in the facility (Para. 0221 and 0294), (iv) comprises at least a portion disposed in an envelope of the facility (Para. 0221 and 0294), (v) is configured to facilitate control of the facility (Para. 0221 and 0294), (vi) is configured to facilitate media communication, data communication, cellular communication, and power communication (Para. 0090), (vii) comprises a coaxial cable, an optical cable, and/or a twisted wire (Para. 0079) and/or (vii) comprises wired and/or wireless communication (Para. 0079). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the network (i) is configured to facilitate power and data communication on a single cable, (ii) is configured to facilitate at least a third generation, fourth generation or fifth generation cellular communication, (iii) comprises at least a portion that is a first network installed in the facility, (iv) comprises at least a portion disposed in an envelope of the facility, (v) is configured to facilitate control of the facility, (vi) is configured to facilitate media communication, data communication, cellular communication, and power communication, (vii) comprises a coaxial cable, an optical cable, and/or a twisted wire and/or (vii) comprises wired and/or wireless communication as taught by the method of locating a transceiver of Gherardi in the combination of Khong in view of Reede since Gherardi teaches it is known to include these features in a method of locating a transceiver for the purpose of providing a reliable, accurate and precise method of locating a transceiver. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-6 and 69-79 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Ahn et al. (US 2013/0196683) discloses an apparatus that includes at least one controller comprising circuitry, a coordinator transceiver, a first transceiver and a second transceiver. Lee et al. (US 2011/0026364) discloses a system that includes a coordinator transceiver, a first transceiver and a second transceiver in which a three-dimensional (3D) position is calculated based on distances and direction angles of the transceivers. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAWAYNE A PINKNEY whose telephone number is (571)270-1305. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Pinping Sun can be reached at 571-270-1284. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAWAYNE PINKNEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872 03/24/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 07, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 26, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 24, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593976
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING VISUAL AXIS OF THE EYE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588808
Imaging Systems with Improved Accuracy and Measurements
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591162
Controllable Aperture with Index-Matched Central Region for a Portable Electronic Device Imaging System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588811
Modular Platform for Ocular Evaluations
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590489
WINDOW OR DOOR, AND BUILDING WALL COMPRISING SAID WINDOW OR DOOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.0%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1704 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month