Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/791,785

COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS (ALS) AND OTHER NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 08, 2022
Examiner
BENZION, GARY
Art Unit
1681
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
The Sallie Astor Burdine Breast Foundation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
17%
Grant Probability
At Risk
2-3
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
30%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 17% of cases
17%
Career Allow Rate
15 granted / 89 resolved
-43.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
98
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§103
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 89 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the claims Claims 38-51, 55 have been canceled. Claims 30-37, 52-54 and 56 are currently pending. Of the claims pending claim 30, 54 and 56 are currently amended. The examiner and art unit assigned to this application has been changed. Currently the application is assigned to art unit 1681 to SPE Gary Benzion. The election of BSA as a membrane stabilizer, made on 9/3/2025 is again acknowledge. The restriction requirement is still deemed proper and final. The objections to claims 30 and 52 is withdrawn in view of applications amendment. Prior Art The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 30-35, 37, 52-56 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Frezza et al., “Organelle isolation: functional and morphological analysis of mitochondria,” Nature Protocols 2:287–295 (2007). In view of Wieckowski et al., “Isolation of mitochondria-associated membranes and mitochondria from tissues and cells,” Nature Protocols 4:1582–1590 (2009) and Islam et al. Nat. Med: (18(5) 759-765. Mitochondrial transfer from bone marrow-derived stromal cells to pulmonary alveoli protects against acute lung injury. Claim 30 (currently amended) broadly requires the following element to comprise the mitochondrial isolation buffer comprising: (a) buffering agent; (b) a chelating agent; (c) a sugar; (d) an agent that acts as a membrane stabilizer and/or oxygen radical scavenger and/or binder of Ca+ and/or binder of free fatty acid; and (e) a serine protease inhibitor; and (f) isolated donor mitochondria from mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Freeze et al. teach a mitochondria isolation buffer comprising mM TRIS-MOPS as a zwitterionic sulfonic-acid buffering agent, including EGTA in mitochondrial isolation buffers, a sugar, the use of fatty‑acid‑free bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a membrane stabilizer and free‑fatty‑acid binder (e.g., IBm1 contains 2 mL of 10% BSA per 100 mL. Additionally, the authors recommend including 0.1% fatty‑acid‑free albumin in EB to prevent uncoupling by fatty acids). Frezza et al.'s buffer recipes (IBc, IBm1, IBm2, EBc, EBm) contain sucrose, Tris/MOPS, EGTA/EDTA, KCl, MgCl2, and BSA, and do not list antibiotics in the isolation or experimental buffers. Freeza et al. do not teach the use of a serine protease inhibitor, but do acknowledge that proteases can damage mitochondria and suggest that isolation should be done at 40C. In this regard, Wieckowski et al. teach the use of PMSF in the isolation buffer for mitochondria from tissue and cells. Thus, the teachings of Freeza et al. and Wieckowski et al. are appropriately combinable as they both teach buffers that are used in the isolation of mitochondria. Neither reference teach the isolation of donor mitochondria from mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). However, Islam et al. teaches isolation of mitochondria from mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) using a phosphate-buffered saline IPBS) is routine. Thus, Islam teach that MSC cells were known to contain mitochondria which can be isolated. With regard to claim 56, drawn to a kit comprising: instructions for administration of a donor mitochondria composition to a subject; and a mitochondrial isolation buffer composition for use in mitochondrial organelle transplantation, said composition comprising: (a) a buffering agent; (b) a chelating agent; (c) a sugar; a membrane stabilizer; and (e)a serine protease inhibitor; and (f) isolated donor mitochondria from mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). The claim comprises the elements of claim 30 with the further limitation of written instruction; Where a product merely serves as a support for printed matter, no functional relationship exists. In this instance the “written instruction” is given no patentable weight. According to the MPEP, the first step of the printed matter analysis is the determination that the limitation in question is in fact directed toward printed matter. See In re DiStefano, 808 F.3d 845, 848, 117 USPQ2d 1265, 1267 (Fed. Cir. 2015). Once it is determined that the limitation is directed to printed matter, the examiner must then determine if the matter is functionally or structurally related to the associated physical substrate, and only if the answer is ‘no’ is the printed matter owed no patentable weight." Id. at 850, 117 USPQ2d at 1268. Since the instruction in claim 56 are drawn to instructions for administration of a donor composition to a subject it is given no patentable weight and the limitations of claim 56 are subsumed by the prior art of record. Conclusion No Claim is allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Gary Benzion whose telephone number is (571)272-0782. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 7 am to 4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yvonne Eyler can be reached at 571-272-1200. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GARY BENZION/ Ph.D.Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1681
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 08, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 17, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599102
HYBRID TOMATO VARIETY 72-CK0621 RZ
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588643
SOYBEAN CULTIVAR 21240438
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12545950
Methods for Preparing CDNA Samples for RNA Sequencing, and CDNA Samples and Uses Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12532857
SOYBEAN CULTIVAR 22080703
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12173353
COMPOSITION COMPRISING CELL ORIGINATION BARCODES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF BOTH GENOMIC DNA AND CDNA FROM THE SAME CELL
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 24, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
17%
Grant Probability
30%
With Interview (+13.5%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 89 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month