Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/794,322

COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 21, 2022
Examiner
WITHERSPOON, SIKARL A
Art Unit
1692
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Daicel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1403 granted / 1630 resolved
+26.1% vs TC avg
Minimal -21% lift
Without
With
+-21.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1666
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1630 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2019/188512 (‘512), EP 2444462 (‘462), an JP 2019006903 (‘903) in combination. The claims are drawn to a composition comprising a compound (1), and a compound (A), which is an alkanolamine compound, and to a process for preparing said composition. The ‘512 reference teaches an ink for the production of an electronic device, wherein the ink comprises a solution of a compound of formula (1) and a fluid organic substance. The ‘512 reference does not teach that the fluid organic substance is an alkanolamine compound. The ‘462 reference teaches an electrically conductive ink comprises a metal colloid solution containing metal particles, and a stabilizing agent that is dispersed in the metal colloid solution and comprises an amine compound (abstract). The amine compound may be an alkanolamine selected from diethanolamine, diglycolamine, triethanolamine, n-propanolamine, N-aminoethylethanolamine, and the like (0018-0020). The ’903 reference teaches a conductive copper ink composition comprising copper formate and an amino-alcohol (abstract). The amino-alcohol may be selected from diethanolamine, N-methyldiethanolamine, N-ethyldiethanolamine, 3-amino-1,2-propanediol, and the like (0011). The amino-alcohol is added to facilitate reduction of the copper salt and protect metallic copper. A thickening agent, of which the amino-alcohol may also act as, may be added to the electrically conductive copper ink composition in order to improve the coatability and stability of the ink (0027). The instant claims are rendered obvious by the combined reference teachings, since the ‘512 reference teaches that ink for producing an electronic device, i.e., electrically conductive ink, may be stabilized using a composition comprising a compound of formula (1) and a fluid organic substance. Both the ‘462 and ‘903 references teach that fluid organic substances including alkanolamine compounds may be employed as thickening agents or stabilizers in conductive ink compositions, thereby providing the motivation to include an alkanolamine as a fluid organic substance in the compositions taught by the ‘512 reference. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SIKARL A WITHERSPOON whose telephone number is (571)272-0649. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-9pm IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Scarlett Goon can be reached at 571-270-5241. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SIKARL A WITHERSPOON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1692
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 21, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599897
DIRECT CATALYTIC CONVERSION OF ALCOHOLS TO OLEFINS OF HIGHER CARBON NUMBER WITH REDUCED ETHYLENE PRODUCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600690
METHOD OF ETHANOL CONVERSION TO HIGHER CARBON COMPOUNDS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595219
CONTINUOS FLOW SYNTHESIS OF CANNABIDIOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595222
CURCUMINOIDS, ANALOGS THEREOF, AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595221
HYDROFORMYLATION PROCESSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (-21.0%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1630 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month