Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/795,341

WINGED CAPSULE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 26, 2022
Priority
Feb 07, 2020 — provisional 62/971,355 +2 more
Examiner
STIGELL, THEODORE J
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Elanco Tiergesundheit AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
978 granted / 1250 resolved
+8.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1300
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1250 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted before the mailing date of the instant action are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (claims 1-7, 10-11, 14, and 26) in the reply filed on 12/9/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 29-31, 44-45, 47, 49-50, and 53 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/9/2025. Claim Objections Claims 14 and 26 are objected to because of the following informalities: On line 1 of claim 14, “any of the preceding claims” should recite a particular claim because some of the preceding claims (8-9 and 12-13) are cancelled. For the purposes of this action, the claim is interpreted as being dependent upon claim 1. On line 1 of claim 26, “any one of claims 1 to 13” should recite a particular claim because some of the preceding claims (8-9 and 12-13) are cancelled. For the purposes of this action, the claim is interpreted as being dependent upon claim 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7, 10-11, 14, and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Argenta Innovation LTD (WO 2019/164410; hereafter Argenta). In regard to claim 1, Argenta discloses a winged capsule (1) for delivery of a substance to an animal (see at least par. [0001], [0002]), the winged capsule comprising: a capsule (2) having a bottom wall (bottom of tubular wall; see Fig. 3 for a close-up view or plunger 12; or element 12 or element 4) and a tubular wall (see tubular wall in Figs. 1-2) extending from the bottom wall, the tubular wall and the bottom wall defining an inner space adapted to contain the substance (see par. [0003], [0140], [0173]-[0174]), and the bottom wall having an aperture (see the opening of 2 at the bottom portion or aperture 13 of element 12 or apertures 11 of 4) adapted to deliver the substance to the animal (see at least par. [0077]-[0080] and [0191]-[0192]); and a capsule retainer (3) including a central wing portion (at and around 18) connected to the capsule and wings (portions 7, 8, 9 of 3) connected to and extending laterally from the central wing portion along a wing plane (see at least Fig. 1), the central wing portion having a maximum central width (see at least Fig. 7), wherein each of the wings has a distal end (at 10) having a distal width and an intermediate section between the distal end and the central wing portion (any portion between 10 and 18 can be considered the intermediate zone), the intermediate section having a width narrowing from a width adjacent the central wing portion to the distal width (see par. [0093]-[0095]). In regard to claim 2, Argenta discloses wherein the capsule has an outer cross-section width measured perpendicularly to a longitudinal extent of the wings, wherein the maximum central width is at least 60% of the outer cross-section width of the capsule (see par. [0093]-[0095]; the width of the wings can decrease as moved away from the central portion; if the central portion is wider than the wings, this condition is met). In regard to claim 3, Argenta discloses wherein the capsule retainer (3) includes a localized flexure area (area adjacent 7) within the central wing portion of the capsule retainer (see par. [0262]; the area 7 is more rigid than the other areas but is configured to bend at some forces). In regard to claim 4, Argenta discloses wherein the capsule retainer (3) comprises a transverse rib (portion of rib 15 extending from center to edge; see Fig. 7) in the central wing portion, and extending distally from the transverse rib along the wing plane, lateral edge ribs (outer lateral ribs 15; see Fig. 7) and an intermediate longitudinal rib (middle portion of ribs 15 between the lateral edge ribs (see at least Fig. 7). In regard to claim 5, Argenta discloses wherein at least one of the lateral edge ribs and the intermediate longitudinal rib comprises a notch within the central wing portion (see U-shaped notches in Fig. 8). In regard to claim 6, Argenta discloses wherein the central wing portion comprises a localized flexure area (area adjacent 7). In regard to claim 7, Argenta discloses wherein the localized flexure area (area adjacent 7) comprises reduced height rib portions of the lateral edge ribs and/or the intermediate longitudinal rib (see par. [0127]-[0128]; any height can be considered reduced from another greater height). In regard to claim 10, Argenta discloses wherein the lateral edge ribs and the intermediate longitudinal ribs extend distally from the localized flexure area (see Figure 7; the localized flexure area can be considered to end before the portion 7 ends). In regard to claim 11, Argenta discloses wherein the central wing portion comprises a transverse rib (15) and the transverse rib includes a cavity (18), a width of the transverse rib being greater than a diameter of the cavity (see Figs. 1, 2, and 7). In regard to claim 14, Argenta discloses wherein the capsule has a top portion adjacent a bottom portion (see Fig. 1), the bottom portion including the bottom wall (4), the bottom wall having a flat surface section encircling the aperture (11) and having a first thickness, a rounded circumferential edge surface (at 6 in Fig. 3), and a reinforcement section (where 20 meets 19 in Figure 3) between the flat surface section and the rounded radial edge surface, the reinforcement section having a second thickness greater than the first thickness (see Fig. 3). In regard to claim 26, Argenta discloses wherein the capsule retainer (3) comprises a top surface (see Fig. 1) and a bottom surface opposite the top surface (see Fig. 2), lateral edge ribs (10) and intermediate longitudinal ribs (15) extending from the top surface, and bottom ribs (15) extending from the bottom surface (see par. [0121]- the ribs can be positioned on the top and bottom surface of the wings). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THEODORE J STIGELL whose telephone number is (571)272-8759. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Tsai can be reached at 571-270-5246. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. THEODORE J. STIGELL Primary Examiner Art Unit 3783 /THEODORE J STIGELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 26, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629506
Low-Profile Single and Dual Vascular Access Device
3y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629473
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING MIXTURES
3y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12616498
A GUIDE DEVICE FOR CANNULAS FOR THE COLLECTION OF MICRO-FRAGMENTED SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE TISSUE
3y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12616765
UV Integrated Disinfecting Cap
3y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12605503
CANNULA SYSTEM WITH RIGID CANNULA
3y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.7%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1250 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month