Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/797,191

HYBRID POWER SYSTEM FOR LAWN ROBOTS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 03, 2022
Examiner
MEYER, JACOB B
Art Unit
3613
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Texaroba Technology Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
562 granted / 754 resolved
+22.5% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
768
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.5%
+2.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 754 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “wherein either [first alternative] the control board provides a driving power for driving at least one of [second alternative] end units of the robot or the robotic lawn mower, said end units being at least a cutting assembly having at least a set of cutting tools and a moving assembly having a set of moving wheels.” This is unclear and confusing because there are two alternative statements and only one alternative listed (see bold above). This renders the claims indefinite because the clause is not complete (i.e. is a sentence fragment). Claims Not Rejected by Prior Art Claims 1-15 are neither anticipated by nor obvious over the prior art of record. They are, however, not in condition for allowance in view of the issues under 35 USC §112(b) as discussed above. Regarding claims currently rejected under 35 USC §112(b), please note that rejections under 35 USC §102 and 103 should not be based upon considerable speculation as to the meaning of the terms employed and assumptions as to the scope of the claims when the claims are not definite. See In re Steele 305 F.2d 859, 862, 134 USPQ 292, 295 (CCPA 1962). When no reasonably definite meaning can be ascribed to certain terms in a claim, the subject matter does not become anticipated or obvious, but rather the claim becomes indefinite. See In re Wilson 424 F.2d 1382, 1385, 165 USPQ 494, 496 (CCPA 1970). As such, the currently pending claims may be subject to prior art rejections not set forth herein upon the clarification of the claim language. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art discloses examples of hybrid lawn care robots with structures and control arrangements similar to that of the claims. See at least Sandin US Pat. No. 8,634,960. As a whole, the references cited disclose features of the claims that may be of interest to Applicant for review. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACOB B MEYER whose telephone number is (571)270-3535. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9-7. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, J Allen Shriver can be reached at 303.297.4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JACOB B. MEYER Primary Examiner Art Unit 3613 /JACOB B MEYER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 03, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589480
Storage Device System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582568
ULTRASOUND-GUIDED INTERVENTIONAL OPERATION VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570132
FRAME FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565409
CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE WITH A LATERAL CAB AND A BATTERY MODULE FASTENED BENEATH THE CAB
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558950
INTEGRATED INTERNAL COMBUSTION ELECTRIC MOTOR (ICEM) CONCEPT FOR HYBRID AND PLUG-IN HYBRID VEHICLE APPLICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+16.8%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 754 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month