Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/797,527

FEEDING METHOD OF A CARDING MACHINE IN ORDER TO OBTAIN A BLENDED YARN, YARN AND FABRIC OBTAIN WITH IT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 04, 2022
Priority
Feb 07, 2020 — GB 2001662.2 +1 more
Examiner
THOMPSON, CAMIE S
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Lightowlers Yarns Limited
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
967 granted / 1319 resolved
+8.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1373
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
63.5%
+23.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1319 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on January 15, 2026 has been entered. Applicant’s amendment and accompanying remarks filed January 15, 2026 are acknowledged. Examiner acknowledges amended claims 2-7, 12, 14 and 30. Examiner acknowledges cancelled claims 1, 10, 15 and 17-27. Examiner acknowledges that the amendment includes all claims being depended upon independent claim 33. The rejection of claims 1, 14, 28-31 and 33-34 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Moore et al., U.S. Patent Number 3,815,179 is withdrawn by Applicant’s argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 9 is rendered indefinite because it is unclear if the first blend ratio is in the range of 70:30 to 30:70 OR 65:35 to 35:65 OR 60:40 to 40:60 OR 55:45 to 45:55 OR 50:50. For purposes of examination, Examiner is interpreting the claim to refer to the first blend ratio is in the range of 70:30 to 30:70. Claims 2-6, 8, 11-14, 16, 28-34 are allowed. Applicant claims a method of creating a fabric or garment as recited in claim 33. The closest prior art, Moore et al., U.S. Patent Number 3,815,179, teaches space-dyed yarn rovings [strand] or rovings having successive portions of relatively different dye affinity are produced for the subsequent spinning of yarns therefrom by forming a sliver or a lap of slivers having successive portions of relatively different color and/or dye affinity characteristics, and feeding the sliver or lap into a finisher carding machine with the portions thereof of relatively different characteristics entering the carding machine in succession so as to form a carded web of corresponding successive portions. The carded web is then split into a plurality of strips which are converted into yarn rovings while preserving the different characteristics of the successive portions thereof [abstract]. It is disclosed in column 2, lines 6 29 a series of feeders is arranged rearwardly of a breaker carding machine for depositing successive elongate rows of masses of fibers on the feed apron of the breaker carding machine, wherein each row may be of a different characteristic than the immediately succeeding row, SO as to form a carded web having successive portions of relatively different characteristics corresponding to the different characteristics of respective successive rows of fibers being fed, whereupon the carded web delivered from the breaker carding machine is condensed into a sliver. Applicant's claim is not specific to the loading schedule. Examiner is corresponding each row of masses of fibers and first and second components. Additionally, Applicant's claim is silent to the specific loading amount. Column 7, lines 56-67 discloses a group of six rows of fibers 30, for example, and each having three fibrous sections 30a, 30b, 30c of different characteristics (FIG. 2), is to be fed to breaker carding machine 23 during each composite cycle of feeder unit 20 and transfer means 22. Accordingly, with the low surface of cam 35a aligned with switch 35c (FIG. 3), hopper conveyors 20a, 20b are thus feeding fibers into catch pan 20c. Successive elongate rows of fibers 30 are thus deposited on hopper discharge conveyor means 20g, and each successive row 30 is pushed, by pusher plate 20h, toward pressure roll 20i and thus is advanced in a first direction transversely thereof onto accumulator apron 21. Each time a predetermined weight of stock is deposited thereon so as to deposit a sectionalized elongate row of fibers 30 (FIG. 2) on the discharge conveyor means 20g of fiber feeder unit 20. See column 4, lines 44-47. Moore fails to teach or suggest wherein a load process to vary the first load amount in accordance with a pre-defined function which allows for gradual changes in yarn properties through its length requiring a loading schedule. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the present claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CAMIE S THOMPSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1530. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Boyd, can be reached at 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CAMIE S THOMPSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 04, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 29, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 17, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 15, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635468
HOLDING TOOL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
4y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630474
FORMALDEHYDE-FREE BINDER COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE BINDERS UNDER CONTROLLED ACIDIC CONDITIONS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623948
OPTICAL FIBER GLASS PREFORM AND METHOD FOR DRAWING OPTICAL FIBER GLASS PREFORM
4y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624166
FILMS FOR MULTIPLE LAYERS ASSEMBLIES
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616274
TEXTILES AND ARTICLES AND PROCESSES FOR MAKING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+10.5%)
3y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1319 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month