Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 17/797,763

Method for Production of LixSiyOz Coatings Using a Single Source for Li And Si and Resultant Coated Products

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 05, 2022
Priority
Feb 06, 2020 — provisional 62/970,881 +1 more
Examiner
TALBOT, BRIAN K
Art Unit
1712
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Technion Research & Development Foundation Limited
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
691 granted / 1170 resolved
-5.9% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+31.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
1228
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
64.2%
+24.2% vs TC avg
§102
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1170 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 5/22/26 has been entered. Considering the amendment filed 5/22/26, claims 2,7 and 13-28 have been canceled. Claim 29 has been withdrawn from consideration as being directed toward a non-elected invention detailed in paper filed 3/26/25. Claim 30 has been added. In conclusion, claims 1,3-6,8-12 and 30 remain in the application for prosecution thereof. Applicants’ election to a specie of the claimed volatile organo silyl compound has been selected to be tBuMe2SiLi also recited in claims 3 and 30. The other volatile organo silyl compounds have been withdrawn from consideration and should be canceled. Considering the amendment filed 5/22/26, the 35 USC 112 rejections have been withdrawn. However, the following rejection has been necessitated by the amendment. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1,3-8,8-12 and 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. With the election of tBuMe2SiLi as the precursor in paper filed 5/22/25, claim 1, 3 and 30 all recite the same limitations (claimed tBuMe2SiLi precursor and ozone) and therefore are not further limiting. While claim 30 recites alternating pulses. Claims 1 and 3 recite ALD which is a method of alternating pulses of gases in forming layer deposition and hence the limitation of alternating pulses is met. The Examiner suggests amending claim 1 to recite the elected volatile organo silyl compound consisting of tBuMe2SiLi while cancelling all the other compounds recited as well as cancelling claims 3 and 30 to overcome the rejection as not being further limiting. Claims 4-6 and 8-12 are rejected as being dependent upon a rejected base claim. Reasons for indication of Allowable subject matter The following is an Examiner’s statement for indication of allowance: The prior art of records fails to teach performing ALD or MLD of a composition consisting of tBuMe2SiLi in alternating pulses with ozone on a substrate. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN K TALBOT whose telephone number is (571)272-1428. The examiner can normally be reached Monday -Friday 7-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MICHAEL CLEVELAND can be reached at 571-272-1418. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN K TALBOT/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1712
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 22, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 23, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 23, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692623
METHOD OF PROCESSING SUBSTRATE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695120
LITHIUM-ION BATTERY
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689055
ELECTRODE PLATE, ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY CONTAINING SAME, AND BATTERY
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12681353
OPTICAL DEVICE FABRICATION
4y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678822
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SUBSTRATE FUNCTIONALIZATION
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+31.0%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1170 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month