Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/801,031

AEROSOL PROVISION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 19, 2022
Examiner
WILL, KATHERINE A
Art Unit
1747
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Nicoventures Trading Limited
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
297 granted / 449 resolved
+1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
493
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.4%
+11.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 449 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10/31/25 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 5-7, 10-12, 14, and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dai et al. (US 2017/0013884). Claims 1, 6, 11, 14, and 15. Dai et al. discloses an electronic cigarette 10 comprising a proximal cylindrical housing section 14 containing a liquid storage chamber 36 ([0028]; [0033]; Figure 1). The liquid reservoir 32 may be a collapsible liquid reservoir 32 and may resemble a bladder that is made of a plastic, a little or non-elastic thin film, or any type of material that is collapsible and may hold liquid or a solid tube with an inside sliding plug. The liquid reservoir 32 may be enlarged when filled with a desired liquid to be vaporized. As liquid is drawn from the reservoir, the liquid reservoir 32 may collapse and shrink (level of liquid within the reservoir is variable) ([0042]; Figure 1). Dai et al. discloses liquid reservoir 32 having walls made of a plastic, a little or non-elastic thin film, or any type of material that is collapsible and may hold liquid, where the walls are arranged along different axes along the wall ([0042]; Figure 1). Claims 2, 7, and 12. Dai et al. discloses that the electronic cigarette 10 comprises a liquid transport device 26 (wick) connected to the opening of the liquid reservoir 32 ([0032]-[0033]; Figure 1 showing resilient walls of the liquid storage chamber 36 on each side of the liquid transport device 26 (wick)). Claims 5 and 10. Dai et al. discloses liquid reservoir 32 having non-equal spacing between the walls (Figure 1). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 9/3/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that in Dai, the liquid reservoir 32 is a collapsible bladder that collapses as liquid is drawn from the reservoir. Dai teaches that the reservoir does not contain gases so the liquid stays at a constant pressure. Applicant asserts that Dai does not teach “wherein a level of the liquid within the cartomizer is variable”. Examiner disagrees, since the specification does not provide a specific definition for “a level of the liquid” and one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that the broadest reasonable interpretation of “a level of liquid” is “an amount of liquid” in the reservoir. The claims do not require that the reservoir contains both liquid and a gas where the interface between the liquid and gas is defined as “the level”. Although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Katherine A Will whose telephone number is (571)270-0516. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10:00AM-6:00PM(EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Wilson can be reached on (571)270-3882. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATHERINE A WILL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 19, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 28, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Dec 30, 2024
Response Filed
May 29, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Sep 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 31, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593877
VAPING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12543801
ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12538943
NONWOVEN POUCH COMPRISING HEAT SEALABLE BINDER FIBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12538945
Method and System for Identifying Smoking Articles
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12527346
PODS FOR VAPORIZERS AND SMOKING PRODUCTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+21.3%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 449 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month