Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/801,055

DESIGNER PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS FOR THE DETECTION, PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF CORONAVIRUS DISEASE, 2019 (COVID-19)

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 19, 2022
Examiner
KINSEY WHITE, NICOLE ERIN
Art Unit
1672
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
United Biomedical, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
493 granted / 858 resolved
-2.5% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
890
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§102
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
§112
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 858 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
CTNF 17/801,055 CTNF 82619 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Election/Restrictions 08-25-02 Applicant’s election of Group I and species CpG in the reply filed on 12/1/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Status of the Claims Claims 40, 43, 48, and 71 have been withdraw as being directed to a non-elected invention. Claims 1-11, 13-21, 25-26, 28, are 74-100 are under examination at this time. Specification The use of trademarks has been noted in this application. A trademark should be capitalized wherever it appears and be accompanied by the generic terminology. Although the use of trademarks is permissible in patent applications, the proprietary nature of the marks should be respected and every effort made to prevent their use in any manner, which might adversely affect their validity as trademarks. Claim Objections 07-29-01 AIA Claim 8 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 8 should be amended to delete “is” in part d) so that the claim reads as “peptides from a pathogen protein [[is]] selected from the group . . . “ . Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 07-30-01 AIA The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. 07-31-03 AIA Claim 25-26, 79-82, and 97-99 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), first paragraph, because the specification, while being enabling for inhibiting or reducing COVID-19 in a subject , does not reasonably provide enablement for preventing COVID-19 in a subject . The specification does not enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make or use the invention commensurate in scope with these claims. Nature of the invention . The claims are directed to a method for preventing COVID-19 in a subject administering the claimed fusion protein comprising, inter alia , the RBD from SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Breadth of the claims . The claims are broad, encompassing preventing COVID-19 in any subject. Guidance in the specification and working examples . There are several examples demonstrating the ability of the claimed fusion protein to induce neutralizing antibodies (in rats and macaques) and reduce viral load in lung tissue (in rats). However, none of the examples demonstrate that the claimed fusion protein was able to prevent COVID-19 in a subject. Given the breadth of the claims, the lack of guidance in the specification, and the lack of predictability of the art, it would require undue experimentation for one skilled in the art to use the claimed composition and method . 07-36 AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. 07-36-01 AIA Claim 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 18, from which claim 19 depends, states that the excipient comprises a CpG oligonucleotide and aluminum phosphate. Claim 19 states that the excipient comprises histidine, histidine HCl-H20, arginine HCl, polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate, hydrochloric acid, sodium chloride, 2-phenoxyethanol, and water. Claim 19 does not further limit the excipient of claim 18. Instead, claim 19 changes the scope from CpG oligonucleotide and aluminum phosphate to histidine, histidine HCl-H20, arginine HCl, polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate, hydrochloric acid, sodium chloride, 2-phenoxyethanol, and water . Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter SEQ ID NOs: 227, 235, 235 and 355 are free of the prior art. Claims 1-7,9-11, 13-18, 20-21, 28, 74-78, 83-96, and 100 are allowable. Citation of Pertinent Prior Art 07-96 AIA The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Du et al. (Vaccine, 2007, 25:2832–2838) teaches RBD-Fc comprising the RBD from the SARS-CoV spike protein. Du et al. does not teach that the fusion protein also contains Th and/or CTL epitopes from the N, M or S protein or SARS-CoV . Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Nicole Kinsey White whose telephone number is (571)272-9943. The examiner can normally be reached M to Th 6:30 am to 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Visone can be reached at 571-270-0684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICOLE KINSEY WHITE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1672 Application/Control Number: 17/801,055 Page 2 Art Unit: 1672 Application/Control Number: 17/801,055 Page 3 Art Unit: 1672 Application/Control Number: 17/801,055 Page 4 Art Unit: 1672 Application/Control Number: 17/801,055 Page 5 Art Unit: 1672 Application/Control Number: 17/801,055 Page 6 Art Unit: 1672
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 19, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589145
SYSTEMS TO PRODUCE B CELLS GENETICALLY MODIFIED TO EXPRESS SELECTED ANTIBODIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584917
RECOMBINANT ANTIBODIES, KITS COMPRISING THE SAME, AND USES THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584147
RATIONAL POLYPLOID ADENO-ASSOCIATED VIRUS VECTORS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISEASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571000
DIAPHRAGM-SPECIFIC NUCLEIC ACID REGULATORY ELEMENTS AND METHODS AND USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560603
Self-Contained Apparatus and System for Detecting Microorganisms
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+16.2%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 858 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month