Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/801,234

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING UPLINK TRANSMISSION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 19, 2022
Examiner
KAO, JUTAI
Art Unit
2473
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
BEIJING XIAOMI MOBILE SOFTWARE CO., LTD.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
531 granted / 664 resolved
+22.0% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
698
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
58.1%
+18.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 664 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 11/11/2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 11/11/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The Applicant argues that previously cited reference Gou fails to disclose the currently amended claim features and Yin fails to cure the deficiencies of Gou. The argument with regards to Gou is moot, however, Yin is found to disclose the currently amended claim features as shown in the rejections below. The Applicant did not address how Yin fails to disclose the currently amended claim features. Therefore, new grounds of rejections based on Yin are applied to the currently amended claims as shown in the rejections below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 8, 13, 15-16, 18, 20, 22 and 24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yin (US 2022/0377750). Yin discloses the following features. Regarding claim 1, a method for processing uplink transmission (see “uplink channel” recited in paragraph [0203]), comprising: determining, by a communication device (see UE 102 in Fig. 1), that an uplink transmission of a first priority and an uplink transmission of a second priority overlap in a time domain, and the first priority being higher than the second priority (see Fig. 17 showing overlap of high-priority channel 1702 and low-priority channel 1704), wherein the uplink transmission is a PUCCH transmission (see “determine that a transmission of a first uplink channel with high-priority overlaps in time with a transmission of a second uplink channel with low-priority, where the uplink channel may be a PUCCH…” recited in paragraph [0203]); determining, by the communication device, a time point, wherein the time point is a start time point of a start position of resource of the uplink transmission of the first priority (see Fig. 17 and paragraph [0170], which recites “In example 17a, the high-priority channel 1702 starts at the same symbol as the low-priority channel 1704. In example 17b, the high-priority channel 1702 starts earlier than the low-priority channel 1704”, during which the start of the high-priority channel is determined); and canceling, by the communication device, the uplink transmission of the second priority after the time point (see Fig. 17b and paragraph [0170], wherein the low-priority channel 1704, which starts after the start of the high-priority channel 1702, is canceled); wherein after canceling the uplink transmission of the second priority after the time point, the uplink transmission of the first priority does not overlap with the uplink transmission of the second priority in the time domain (see Fig. 17b, wherein the low-priority channel 1704 is canceled and therefore does not overlap with the high-priority channel 1702). Regarding claim 8, wherein the communication device is a terminal (see UE 102 in Fig. 1). Regarding claim 13, wherein the communication device is a base station (see “In one example, a base station (gNB), comprises: a higher layer processor configured to determine that a transmission of a first uplink channel with high-priority overlaps in time with a transmission of a second uplink channel with low-priority, where the uplink channel may be a PUCCH or a PUSCH; the higher layer processor configured to drop the second uplink channel with low-priority; and receiving circuitry configured to receive the first uplink channel with high-priority” recited in paragraph [0007]). Regarding claim 15, a communication device (see UE 102 in Fig. 1/UE 1302 in Fig. 13), comprising: a processor; and a memory configured to store instructions executable by the processor (see memory 1305 and processor 1303 in Fig. 13); wherein the processor is configured to: determine that an uplink transmission of a first priority and an uplink transmission of a second priority overlap in a time domain, and the first priority being higher than the second priority (see Fig. 17 showing overlap of high-priority channel 1702 and low-priority channel 1704), wherein the uplink transmission is a PUCCH transmission (see “determine that a transmission of a first uplink channel with high-priority overlaps in time with a transmission of a second uplink channel with low-priority, where the uplink channel may be a PUCCH…” recited in paragraph [0203]); determine a time point, wherein the time point is a start time point of a start position of resource of the uplink transmission of the first priority (see Fig. 17 and paragraph [0170], which recites “In example 17a, the high-priority channel 1702 starts at the same symbol as the low-priority channel 1704. In example 17b, the high-priority channel 1702 starts earlier than the low-priority channel 1704”, during which the start of the high-priority channel is determined); and cancel the uplink transmission of the second priority after the time point (see Fig. 17b and paragraph [0170], wherein the low-priority channel 1704, which starts after the start of the high-priority channel 1702, is canceled); wherein after canceling the uplink transmission of the second priority after the time point, the uplink transmission of the first priority does not overlap with the uplink transmission of the second priority in the time domain (see Fig. 17b, wherein the low-priority channel 1704 is canceled and therefore does not overlap with the high-priority channel 1702). Regarding claim 16, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions which, when executed by a processor (see UE 1302 in Fig. 13 including memory 1305 and processor 1303), cause the processor to: determine that an uplink transmission of a first priority and an uplink transmission of a second priority overlap in a time domain, and the first priority being higher than the second priority (see Fig. 17 showing overlap of high-priority channel 1702 and low-priority channel 1704), wherein the uplink transmission is a PUCCH transmission (see “determine that a transmission of a first uplink channel with high-priority overlaps in time with a transmission of a second uplink channel with low-priority, where the uplink channel may be a PUCCH…” recited in paragraph [0203]); determine a time point, wherein the time point is a start time point of a start position of resource of the uplink transmission of the first priority (see Fig. 17 and paragraph [0170], which recites “In example 17a, the high-priority channel 1702 starts at the same symbol as the low-priority channel 1704. In example 17b, the high-priority channel 1702 starts earlier than the low-priority channel 1704”, during which the start of the high-priority channel is determined); and cancel the uplink transmission of the second priority after the time point (see Fig. 17b and paragraph [0170], wherein the low-priority channel 1704, which starts after the start of the high-priority channel 1702, is canceled); wherein after canceling the uplink transmission of the second priority after the time point, the uplink transmission of the first priority does not overlap with the uplink transmission of the second priority in the time domain (see Fig. 17b, wherein the low-priority channel 1704 is canceled and therefore does not overlap with the high-priority channel 1702). Regarding claim 18, wherein the communication device is a terminal (see UE 102 in Fig. 1). Regarding claim 20, wherein the communication device is a base station (see “In one example, a base station (gNB), comprises: a higher layer processor configured to determine that a transmission of a first uplink channel with high-priority overlaps in time with a transmission of a second uplink channel with low-priority, where the uplink channel may be a PUCCH or a PUSCH; the higher layer processor configured to drop the second uplink channel with low-priority; and receiving circuitry configured to receive the first uplink channel with high-priority” recited in paragraph [0007]). Regarding claim 22, wherein the communication device is a terminal (see UE 102 in Fig. 1). Regarding claim 24, wherein the communication device is a base station (see “In one example, a base station (gNB), comprises: a higher layer processor configured to determine that a transmission of a first uplink channel with high-priority overlaps in time with a transmission of a second uplink channel with low-priority, where the uplink channel may be a PUCCH or a PUSCH; the higher layer processor configured to drop the second uplink channel with low-priority; and receiving circuitry configured to receive the first uplink channel with high-priority” recited in paragraph [0007]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUTAI KAO whose telephone number is (571)272-9719. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-17:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kwang Yao can be reached at (571)272-3182. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUTAI KAO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2473
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 19, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 19, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jul 24, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 08, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Nov 11, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598566
IAB Timing Delta MAC CE Enhancement for Case #6 Timing Support
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12574971
PRIORITY HANDLING FOR A RANDOM ACCESS MESSAGE THAT INCLUDES A PREAMBLE AND A PAYLOAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12556434
UPLINK SOUNDING REFERENCE SIGNAL (SRS) TRANSMISSION IN CARRIER AGGREGATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12557056
METHOD FOR TIMING SYNCHRONIZATION, TERMINAL DEVICE, AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12550185
CONFLICT AVOIDANCE BETWEEN RANDOM ACCESS MESSAGES AND OTHER TRANSMISSIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+17.6%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 664 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month