Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/801,335

GAS-LIQUID SEPARATOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 04, 2024
Priority
Feb 25, 2020 — JP PCT/JP2020/007487 +2 more
Examiner
CLEMENTE, ROBERT ARTHUR
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Mayekawa Mfg. Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1080 granted / 1335 resolved
+20.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1360
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
59.1%
+19.1% vs TC avg
§102
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1335 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1 – 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0187032 to Davey et al. (hereinafter referred to as Davey) in view of US Patent No. 4,451,366 to Smisson (hereinafter referred to as Smisson). In regard to claim 1, as best shown in figures 6A – 7, Davey discloses a gas-liquid separator (50) that can separate gas and liquid from a gas-liquid mixture. Thee separator includes a body portion (52) having a cylindrical shape. The inlet pipe (81) forms an introduction passage provided in a state of communicating with the body portion (52). A gas-liquid mixture can be introduced through the introduction passage (81). The upper discharge pipe (85) forms an exhaust flow passage for gas from which liquid is separated. A swirl portion in the body portion (52) is formed by the body portion extending in an up-and-down direction and a partition plate (71). Davey includes a curved velocity plate (63) in some embodiments, as discussed in paragraph [0063], but does not disclose a straightening plate attached to the body portion to extend in a chord length direction of a circular arc formed by a barrel of the body portion. As shown in figures 1 and 4, Smisson discloses a similar separator that performs the separation in a vortex chamber (2). As discussed in column 3 lines 51 – 60, the separator can equally be used for solid/liquid, solid/gas, and liquid/gas separation. As discussed in column 2 lines 16 – 26, Smisson includes a deflector plate (10) that enhances the circulating or swirling flow from the inlet (4). As shown in figure 4, the deflector plate (10) extends in a chord length direction of a circular arc formed by a barrel of the vortex chamber (2). The deflector plate (10) can be considered to be a straightening plate. The deflector, or straightening, plate (10) is shown to have a narrow width portion configured such that a distance between the straightening plate (10) and an inner wall of the vortex chamber (2) gradually decreases toward an end portion from the flow from the inlet (4) passes out. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Davey to include a straightening plate attached to the body portion to extend in a chord length direction of a circular arc formed by a barrel of the body portion as suggested by Smisson in order to enhance the circulating or swirling flow from the introduction passage. The straightening plate in the combination includes all of the required structural features and is considered to be capable of straightening the gas-fluid mixture. As shown in figure 4 of Smisson, the straightening plate has a narrow width portion configured such that a distance between the straightening plate and an inner wall of the body portion gradually decreases toward an end portion from which the gas-liquid mixture flows out. In regard to claim 2, as shown in figures 6A – 6C of Davey, an insertion portion of the exhaust flow passage (85) is inserted into the body portion (52). In the combination, this insertion portion extends by an extension length that allows the insertion portion to reach a position of a heigh of an upper end of an extending portion of the straightening plate, the extending portion extending in a horizontal direction. In regard to claim 3, Smisson is used as the secondary reference disclosing the straightening plate. As shown in figure 4, the straightening plate (10) is disposed to extend in the chord length direction of the circular arc formed by the barrel of the body portion (2) when viewed from above, one end of the straightening plate is connected to the inner wall of the body portion, and the other end of the straightening plate has a narrow width portion. In regard to claim 4, Smisson is used as the secondary reference disclosing the straightening plate. As shown in figure 4, the straightening plate (10) is attached to extend in the chord length direction of the circular arc having a length corresponding to 1/4 or less of a circumference of the body portion (2). In regard to claim 5, the introduction passage (81) of Davey can be considered to be connected at a “free” angle and with a “free” offset amount within a range of the circular arc, as broadly recited in the claim. In regard to claim 6, in the operation of the combination, a fluid is blown out from a distal end portion of the straightening plate. The distal end portion has a narrow width portion. The blowing velocity is capable of falling within a rage of 5 m/sec to 20 m/sec. In regard to claim 7, Smisson is used as the secondary reference disclosing the straightening plate. As shown in figures 1 and 4, the straightening plate (10) can be considered to have a square U shape when viewed in a front view. In the combination, the straightening plate is fixed to the inner wall of the body portion at least at a position higher than the introduction passage In regard to claim 8, as shown in figures 6A – 6C, the partition plate (71) in Davey is provided at a position lower than the introduction passage (81), and has an inner diameter smaller than an inner diameter of the body portion (52). In regard to claim 9, additionally, as shown in figures 6A – 6C, the partition plate (71) in Davey is provided along the horizontal direction. In regard to claim 10, the arrestor vanes (75), as shown in figures 15A – 15C of Davey, can be considered to form a demister attached to the partition plate (71), as broadly recited in the claim. In regard to claim 11, as shown in figures 6A – 7, the partition plate (71) in Davey is provided at a position lower than the introduction passage (81). The partition plate (71) is configured to partition the body portion (52) into an upper portion and a lower portion. As shown in figure 15A, a through hole (73) can be formed at an end portion of the partition plate, the through hole penetrating through the partition plate in the up-and- down direction. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Robert Clemente whose telephone number is (571)272-1476. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Lebron can be reached at 571-272-0475. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT CLEMENTE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1773
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 04, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678724
FILTER MATERIAL FOR AIR FILTER AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING FILTER MATERIAL
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673290
DRYER FOR COMPRESSED GAS, COMPRESSOR INSTALLATION PROVIDED WITH A DRYER AND A METHOD FOR DRYING COMPRESSED GAS
4y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673876
SYSTEMS & METHODS FOR AMMONIA RECOVERY, ACID GAS SEPARATION, OR COMBINATION THEREOF
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12654122
ZIGZAG-FOLDED NONWOVEN MATERIAL
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12654119
MID-PRESSURE WATER SEPARATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEM
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+7.2%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1335 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month