Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/804,330

MAGNETIC IMMUNOSENSOR WITH TRENCH CONFIGURATION AND METHOD OF USE

Non-Final OA §112§DP
Filed
May 27, 2022
Examiner
CHIN, CHRISTOPHER L
Art Unit
1677
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Abbott Point Of Care Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
571 granted / 706 resolved
+20.9% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
720
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 706 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Claims 35-54 are pending. Claims 1-34 have been cancelled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 35-54 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 35 is vague. In line 12, the recitation of “the two-dimensional array” lacks antecedent support. Claims 37-41, 44, and 45 are vague. The recitation of “the beads” in each claim lacks antecedent support. It is suggested that these claims be amended to recite “the magnetically susceptible beads” for proper antecedent support. Claims 48-52 are vague. The recitation of “the magnet” in each claim lacks antecedent support. It is suggested that these claims be amended to recite “the permanent high-field magnet” for proper antecedent support. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 35-54 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-27 of U.S. Patent No. 11,402,375. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because patent ‘375 claims a point-of-care magnetic immunosensing device that anticipates the instant invention. Patent ‘375 claims: 1. A point-of-care magnetic immunosensing device, comprising: a cartridge housing comprising a base; a sample chamber comprising a sample inlet for receiving a sample; a conduit in fluidic communication with the sample chamber; a sensor chip located within the conduit and formed on the base of the cartridge housing, wherein the sensor chip comprises a single sensing electrode comprising: a) a silicon wafer, b) a single trench formed in the silicon wafer, wherein the single trench has a length of from 10 to 500 μm, c) an insulating oxide layer formed on the silicon wafer, d) metal layers formed on the insulating oxide layer, e) a photodefinable polyimide formed on the metal layers, and f) electrode openings formed into the photodefinable polyimide exposing portions of the metal layers and forming a two-dimensional array of microfabricated electrodes formed at a bottom of a single trench; a dissolvable dry matrix comprising magnetically susceptible beads, wherein the matrix is configured to dissolve in the sample fluid and wherein the dissolvable dry matrix is located in the sample chamber or the conduit; and a permanent high-field magnet for retaining at least a portion of said beads in said trench, wherein the permanent high-field magnet is formed in the base abutting a bottom of the sensor chip; and a pump for moving the sample from the sample chamber through the conduit to the sensing electrode, wherein the two-dimensional array of microfabricated electrodes comprises a line of microelectrodes in the single trench. 2. The device of claim 1, wherein the beads have an average particle size of from about 0.01 μm to about 20 μm. 3. The device of claim 1, wherein the beads comprise ferrite. 4. The device of claim 1, wherein the beads comprise magnetite (Fe.sub.3O.sub.4). 5. The device of claim 1, wherein the beads comprise a magnetically susceptible core with a polymer coating. 6. The device of claim 1, wherein the beads are coupled to an antibody in the dissolvable dry matrix. 7. The device of claim 6, wherein the antibody is to an analyte selected from the group consisting of cardiac troponin I, troponin T, a troponin complex, human chorionic gonadotropin, BNP, creatine kinase, creatine kinase subunit M, creatine kinase subunit B, creatine kinase MB (CK-MB), proBNP, NT-proBNP, myoglobin, and myosin light chain thereof. 8. The device of claim 6, wherein the antibody is to an analyte selected from the group consisting of beta-HCG, TSH, ultra hTSH II, TT3, TT4, FT3, FT4, myeloperoxidase, D-dimer, CRP, NGAL, PSA, LH, FSH, prolactin, progesterone, estradiol, DHEA-S, AFP, CA 125 II, CA 125, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CA 19-9XR, CEA, thyroxine (T4), triiodothyronine (T3), T-uptake, Tg, anti-Tg, anti-TPO, ferritin, cortisol, insulin, HBsAg, HCV Ag/Ab combo, HCV core Ag, anti-HCV, AUSAB (anti-HBs), CORE, CORE-M, SHBG, iPTH, theophylline, sirolimus, tacrolimus, anti-HAV, anti-HAV IgM, HAVAB, HAVAB-M, HAVAB-M2.0, HAVAB-G, HAVAB 2.0, HAVAB 2.0 Quant, IgM, CMV IgM, CMV IgG, â-2-microglobulin, digitoxin, HBe, anti-HBe, HBeAg, HIV 1/2gO, HIV Ag/Ab combo, testosterone, SCC, vitamin B12, folate, syphilis, anti-HBc, rubella IgG, rubella IgM, homocysteine, MPO, cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG Avidity, toxo IgG avidity, toxo IgG, toxo IgM, C-peptide, vitamin D, HTLV I/II, total âhCG, progesterone, estradrogen, prolactin, myoglobin, tPSA, fPSA, carbamazepine (CBZ), digoxin, gentamicin, NAPA, phenytoin, phenobarbital, valproic acid, vancomycin, procaine, quinidine, tobramycin, methamphetamine (METH), amphetamine (AMPH), barbiturates, benzodiazepine, cannabis, cocaine, methadone, opiates, PCP, acetaminophen, ethanol, salicylates, tricyclics, holoTc, anti-CCP, HbA1c, and barbs-U. 9. The device of claim 1, wherein the beads are mobile within the trough of the single trench. 10. The device of claim 1, wherein the ratio of beads within the trough of the single trench to electrodes of the electrode array is about 1. 11. The device of claim 1, wherein the sample is amended with an anticoagulant. 12. The device of claim 1, wherein the width to height ratio of the single trench is in the range of about 0.1 to about 5. 13. The device of claim 1, wherein the magnet is positioned in a non-coplanar position relative to said electrode array. 14. The device of claim 1, wherein the magnet is positioned below said electrode array. 15. The device of claim 1, wherein the magnet comprises a neodymium iron boron (NdFeB) alloy. 16. The device of claim 1, wherein the magnet comprises a Nd2Fe14B alloy. 17. The device of claim 1, wherein the magnet provides a magnetic field of greater than about 0.1 Tesla. 18. The device of claim 1, wherein the magnet is a bulk magnet. 19. The device of claim 1, wherein the magnet is a substantially cylindrical bulk magnet. 20. The device of claim 1, wherein the magnet is a substantially cylindrical bulk magnet, having a diameter in the range of about 0.1 mm to about 5 mm and a length of about 0.1 mm to about 5 mm. 21. The device of claim 1, wherein the magnet is positioned to yield an event horizon in the range of less than about 200 μm in the region of the electrode array. 22. The device of claim 1, wherein the electrode array is amperometric. 23. The device of claim 1, wherein the electrode array is a gold microarray. 24. The device of claim 1, wherein the average width, height and length of the single trench are each at least twice the mean average particle size of the beads. 25. The device of claim 1, wherein the conduit is coated with the dissolvable dry matrix. 26. The device of claim 1, wherein the device comprises the sample chamber coated within the dissolvable dry matrix, wherein the sample chamber is connected to the conduit between the sample inlet and the two-dimensional array. 27. The device of claim 1, wherein: the width of the single trench is from 0.1 μm to 50 μm, the height of the single trench is from 0.1 μm to 50 μm. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 35-54 are free of the prior art of record because the prior art does not teach magnetic immunosensing device with a sensor chip in a conduit with a high-field magnet and pump as recited in the instant claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER L CHIN whose telephone number is (571)272-0815. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 10:00am - 6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bao-Thuy Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-0824. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER L CHIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1677 2/7/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 27, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601005
METHODS FOR INCREASING THE MOLECULAR SPECIFICITY OF A NANOSENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590958
ASSESSING RESPONSIVENESS OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS TO BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584912
AN IMMUNOCHROMATOGRAPHIC TEST STRIP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584909
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING BIOLOGICAL ANALYTES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12560602
DIAGNOSTIC CARTRIDGE FOR IMMUNODIAGNOSIS AND DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE AND SYSTEM USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.0%)
3y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 706 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month