Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/804,893

BODILY IMPLANT WITH A TUBING CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 01, 2022
Examiner
TRAN, JULIE THI
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
19%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 2m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 19% of cases
19%
Career Allow Rate
7 granted / 36 resolved
-50.6% vs TC avg
Strong +70% interview lift
Without
With
+70.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 2m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
75
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
§103
41.9%
+1.9% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 36 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II in the reply filed on 22 December 2025 is acknowledged. Thus, claims 11 – 15 are being considered on the merits. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Objections Claim 12 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 12, line 3, "to rotation" should read --to a rotation--.. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 11 – 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Herrig (US 20130060268 A1). Regarding claim 11, Herrig teaches a bodily implant ([0002], [0023]) comprising: a connector (“connector 270” [0031] – [0032], [0036], [0038]) configured to connect a first tube member and a second tube member (parts of the “inflow component” [0038]) such that fluid can be transferred through the first tube member and the second tube member ([0038], Examiner interprets “inflow component” can be slid onto one inner connector end.), the connector including: a first rotational connector (“first [… member] 278” [0032] Figure 4) including a lumen (part of the “inflow component” [0038]); a second rotational connector (“second [… member] 280” [0032] Figure 4) including a lumen (part of the “inflow component” [0038]), the first rotational connector (278) configured to engage with the second rotational connector (280) and to rotate with respect to the second rotational connector (280) to couple the first rotational connector (278) and the second rotational connector (280) in a locked configuration (“secured or locked engagement” [0036] Figure 4); and an inner connector (“engagement features 290” [0039] Figure 4) configured to be disposed in the lumen (part of the “inflow component” [0038]) of the first rotational connector (278) and the lumen (part of the “inflow component” [0038]) of the second rotational connector (280). Regarding claim 12, Herrig teaches all limitations of claim 11. Herrig teaches a diameter of the lumen of the first rotational connector (“first [… member] 278” [0032] Figure 4) and a diameter of the lumen of the second rotational connector (“second [… member] 280” [0032] Figure 4) decrease in response to rotation of the first rotational connector (278) with respect to the second rotational connector (280) to place the connector (“connector 270” [0031] – [0032], [0036], [0038]) in a compressed configuration (“closed configuration” [0031] Figure 3) (“In other embodiments, a seal can be imposed between these structures by a clamping structure, such as by closing the clam shell members discussed above. The inflow component 362 can be slid axially until one end thereof abuts with a shoulder 388. Engagement features 390 similar to those discussed above in connection with the connector 270 can be positioned on an outer surface of the connector 370 to mechanically engage with the inner surface or engagement features (not shown) positioned on an inner surface of the inflow component 362.” [0065]; Examiner interprets the clamping structure of Figures 3 and 4 causes a decrease in “a diameter of the lumen of the first rotational connector” and in “a diameter of the lumen of the second rotational connector”). Regarding claim 13, Herrig teaches all limitations of claim 11. Herrig teaches the first rotational connector (“first [… member] 278” [0032] Figure 4) includes a protrusion (see annotated Herrig’s Figure 4 below) and a connector groove (see annotated Herrig’s Figure 4 below), and the second rotational connector (“second [… member] 280” [0032] Figure 4) includes a protrusion (see annotated Herrig’s Figure 4 below) and a connector groove (see annotated Herrig’s Figure 4 below). PNG media_image1.png 672 914 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 14, Herrig teaches all limitations of claim 13. Herrig teaches the protrusion of the first rotational connector (see annotated Herrig’s Figure 1 above) is configured to be inserted into the connector groove of the second rotational connector (see annotated Herrig’s Figure 1 above) while the protrusion of the second rotational connector (see annotated Herrig’s Figure 1 above) is inserted into the connector groove of the first rotational connector (see annotated Herrig’s Figure 1 above). Regarding claim 15, Herrig teaches all limitations of claim 14. Herrig teaches the protrusion of the first rotational connector (see annotated Herrig’s Figure 1 above) is configured to move along the connector groove of the second rotational connector (see annotated Herrig’s Figure 1 above) in response to the first rotational connector (see annotated Herrig’s Figure 1 above) being rotated with respect to the second rotational connector (see annotated Herrig’s Figure 1 above). Examiner interprets moving the first rotational connector and the second rotational connector reads on limitation/claim. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Smutney et al (US 20080214990 A1) discloses a “fluid conduit connector assembly” (abstract). Blake et al (FR-3007813-A1) discloses a “Fluidic connection device” (abstract). Hegland et al (WO 2005030316 A1) discloses “sutureless pump connectors” (abstract). GAGLIARDONI et al (WO 2015024605 A1) discloses “Needlefree valve device (1) for controlling the flow of fluid in a pathway” (abstract). Fangrow (US 20060161115 A1) discloses a “soft grip medical connector” (abstract). Segal et al (US 6402207 B1) discloses a “medical connector adapted for placement between a catheter and a medical infusion or injection source” (abstract and annotated Figure 1 below) and a connector (“a first male medical connector portion 1 and a second female medical connector portion 3”) configured to connect a first tube member and a second tube member (“a first male medical connector portion 1 and a second female medical connector portion 3”) such that fluid can be transferred through the first tube member and the second tube member (“the fluid lumens 10, 60 are disposed in registration with one another to form an intermediate fluid pathway that connects a fluid delivering device to a fluid receiving device”), the connector including: a first rotational connector (“a first male medical connector portion 1”) including a lumen (“the fluid [lumen] 10” Figure 1); a second rotational connector (“second female medical connector portion 3”) including a lumen (“the fluid [lumen…] 60” Figure 1). PNG media_image2.png 424 680 media_image2.png Greyscale Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JULIE T TRAN whose telephone number is (703)756-4677. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday from 8:30 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander Valvis can be reached at (571) 272-4233. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JULIE THI TRAN/Examiner, Art Unit 3791 /ALEX M VALVIS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 01, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12544442
BIOCOMPATIBLE NANOMAGNETIC DISCS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12491060
METHOD OF IMPROVING REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL OF FEMALE MAMMAL USING ULTRA-WEAK PHOTON
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 12478446
MAGNETIC DRIVE SYSTEM AND MICROROBOT CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12329623
ARTIFICIAL URETHRAL SPHINCTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 17, 2025
Patent 12161354
ADHERING BODY AND ADHESION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 10, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
19%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+70.3%)
4y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 36 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month