Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/807,286

TRANSFORMER ARRANGEMENT

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 16, 2022
Examiner
NGUYEN, TUYEN T
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Saab AB
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
1001 granted / 1226 resolved
+13.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
1276
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.5%
+14.5% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1226 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, Claims 1-12 in the reply filed on 04/09/2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dahlgren et al. [US 7,554,431 B2]. Regarding claims 1 and 5, Dahlgren et al. discloses a transformer arrangement [figure 1] for use in power systems comprising: - a transformer core [figure 1], and - a thermal shell [4] in contact with the transformer core, wherein the thermal shell is formed in a material being thermally conductive and magnetic [ferrite material, column 5, line 33], wherein the transformer core comprises a plurality of winding portions [2] extending from a common center portion [1] of the core, along a first axis, a second axis and a third axis, each axis being orthogonal relative to each of the other axis; wherein each winding portion comprises a conductive coil arrangement [3] wound around each winding portion. Dahlgren et al. further discloses the transformer core winding portions, each having a flat contact surface, wherein the thermal shell is in contact with a full area of each of the flat contact surface [figure 2] Dahlgren et al. disclose the instant claimed invention except for the use of the transformer for mounting in an electrical power unit of a vehicle. The specific use of the transformer in power systems of any devices such as in an electrical power unit of a vehicle would have been obvious design matter since it has been held that a recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus satisfying the claimed structural limitations. Ex parte Masham, 2 USPQ2d 1647 (1987). Dahlgren et al. further discloses the thermal shell fully surrounding the transformer core and the core winding portions [figures 1-2]. Dahlgren et al. disclose the instant claimed invention except for the thermal shell is in the form of a cube. Dahlgren et al. further discloses, in other embodiments of figures 7b-7c, including an inner core having a plurality of winding portions having flat end contact surface thereof and outer thermal shell [figures 7b, 7c] that cover/contact flat end winding portion of the inner core, wherein the outer thermal shell in the form of triangle shape or hexagonal shape. The specific cube shape use for the thermal shell would have been an obvious matter of design choice for the purpose of facilitating different mounting and/or assembling. Regarding claims 2-3, Dahlgren et al. further discloses each winding portion of the transformer core comprises, at a distal end, a contact surface, and wherein the thermal shell is in contact with each of the contact surfaces [figures 1-2], wherein the transformer core comprises a first, a second and a third pair of winding portions, wherein each pair of winding portions extend along a common axis away from the center portion [figures 1-2]. Regarding claim 4, Dahlgren et al. further discloses the transformer include the plurality of the conductive coil arrangements [3]. These conductive coil arrangements could be used as a primary conductive coil arrangement connected to an input drawing power from a source and a secondary conductive coil arrangement connected to an output supplying energy to a load, wherein each pair of winding portions [2] comprises a primary coil arrangement and a secondary coil arrangement dividedly wound around the pair of winding portions respectively. Regarding claim 6, Dahlgren et al. further discloses the thermal shell [4] could be formed of ferrite, iron or other soft magnetic material and the core winding portions [core limbs 2] also formed of soft magnetic material. Regarding claims 7-8, Dahlgren et al. discloses the use of the transformer in a power system. Dahlgren et al. disclose the instant claimed invention except for a rectification circuit. It would have been an obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include a rectification circuit with the transformer in a power system of Dahlgren et al. for the purpose of providing rectifying current and/or voltage to the power system. The specific use of 12-pulse rectifying circuit would have been an obvious design consideration based on the intended applications and/or environments uses since it has been held that a recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus satisfying the claimed structural limitations. Ex parte Masham, 2 USPQ2d 1647 (1987). Regarding claim 9, Dahlgren et al. discloses the transformer core is formed as an integral structure [figure 1]. Regarding claim 10, Dahlgren et al. discloses the transformer core is in an isotropic magnetic material, preferably ferrite [column 5, line 33]. Regarding claim 11, the specific cube shape of thermal shell would have been an obvious design consideration based in the intended applications and/or environments uses. Regarding claim 12, Dahlgren et al. discloses the transformer core is formed in ferrite [column 5, line 33]. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-12 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUYEN T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1996. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached on 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUYEN T NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 16, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 03, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 28, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603221
IMPROVED LOW-EMI TRANSFORMER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597552
Magnetic Device and the Method to Make the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592633
POWER CONVERSION MODULE AND MAGNETIC DEVICE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592335
LAMINATED COIL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586708
INNOVATIVE PLANAR ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPONENT STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+0.8%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1226 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month