Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/807,382

ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 17, 2022
Priority
Jun 22, 2021 — provisional 63/213,325
Examiner
KERSHNER, DYLAN CLAY
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
186 granted / 293 resolved
-1.5% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 4m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
345
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
70.4%
+30.4% vs TC avg
§102
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 293 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Au as the metal and monodentate ligands as the denticity of the ligand LA in the reply filed on 2 March 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 5 and 11-14 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 2 March 2026. With regard to the instant claims 15-16 only, a search of the prior art did not show the elected species. As none of the claims were specifically drawn to the elected species in combination with the limitations of one of claims 15-16 in independent form, none of these claims have been indicated as allowable. However, claims written in independent form which require all the limitations of claims 15-16 as well as being limited to the elected species along with any dependent claims which require all the limitations of claims 15-16 as well as being limited to the elected species would be allowable. Claims 15-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims as well as being limited to the elected species. This objection to the claims is only with respect to the elected species. It is noted that the potential allowability of claims 15-16 has not been determined with respect to species beyond the elected species, i.e. potential examinable species that could found once the search is expanded beyond the elected species. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-4, 6-10, and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claims 1-4, 6-10, and 17-20: Claims 1-4, 6-10, and 17-20 require a first ligand LA comprising a 5-membered heterocycle joined to a metal M by a M-C or M-N bond; wherein the 5-membered heterocycle comprises at least one boron atom; wherein M is selected from the group consisting of Os, Ir, Pd, Pt, Cu, Ag, Rh, Re, Ru, and Au. Several exceptions are included: LA does not comprise a structure of Formula I; the 5-membered heterocycle does not include a B-B bond; when M is Pd or Pt and the 5-membered heterocycle is fused to a benzene ring, the benzene ring is not part of a 6-membered chelate ring comprising M. The above description is included in the instant specification, and several examples and subsets of chemical structures are described in detail. However, these detailed descriptions do not encompass the entire scope of the claims. For instance, paragraphs [0087]-[0094] of the instant specification provide detailed descriptions and examples of compounds of the current claims. However, these descriptions and examples do not encompass or provide detailed descriptions for all compounds comprising all 5-membered heterocycles containing a boron atom in a ligand LA that meets the current claim limitations. For example, it is not clear that the compounds of the rejections outlined below were in possession of Applicant at the time of the invention, because they are outside the scope of the more detailed description provided paragraphs [0087]-[0094] of the instant specification and do not have a similar construction to any of the described compound or compound structures of paragraphs [0087]-[0094] of the instant specification. Thus, the specification does not provide a representative number of species sufficient to show that Applicant was in possession of the entire claimed genus (see MPEP 2163-II-A-3-a-ii). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kausamo et al. (“N-Heterocyclic Carbenes with Inorganic Backbones: Electronic Structures and Ligand Properties” Inorganic Chemistry (2008) vol. 47, pp. 1145-1154.) (hereafter “Kausamo”). Regarding claims 1-3: Kausamo discloses the compound shown below {p. 1149, 1st col., 3rd paragraph: Description of a gold complex using a ligand of structure 3 of Kausamo}. PNG media_image1.png 542 1024 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim(s) 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shang et al. (“Facile reactions of gold(I) complexes with tri(tert butyl)azadiboriridine” Dalton Transactions (2018) vol. 47, pp. 5181-5188.) (hereafter “Shang”). Regarding claims 1-3: Shang discloses the compound shown below {Scheme 6}. PNG media_image2.png 326 306 media_image2.png Greyscale Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DYLAN CLAY KERSHNER whose telephone number is (303)297-4257. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9am-5pm (Mountain). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Boyd can be reached at 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DYLAN C KERSHNER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 17, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12643914
ORGANIC MOLECULES FOR OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12641999
COMPOSITION FOR ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE, ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637486
LIGANDS FOR NANO-SIZED MATERIALS
4y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635402
USE OF TRANSITION METAL CARBENE COMPLEXES IN ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DIODES (OLEDS)
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12615908
WIDE BANDGAP PEROVSKITE QUANTUM DOTS IN A PEROVSKITE MATRIX AND PROCESS FOR PREPARING SAME
4y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+37.1%)
4y 4m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 293 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month