Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/811,995

LNCRNAS FOR THERAPY AND DIAGNOSIS OF CARDIAC HYPERTROPHY

Final Rejection §112§DP
Filed
Jul 12, 2022
Examiner
KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS
Art Unit
1683
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
OA Round
2 (Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allow Rate
340 granted / 728 resolved
-13.3% vs TC avg
Strong +53% interview lift
Without
With
+52.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
786
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§103
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
§102
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
§112
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 728 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in reply to Applicants’ correspondence of 11/03/2025. Applicants’ remarks and amendments have been fully and carefully considered but are not found to be sufficient to put the application in condition for allowance. Any new grounds of rejection presented in this Office Action are necessitated by Applicants’ amendments. Any rejections or objections not reiterated herein have been withdrawn in light of the amendments to the claims or as discussed in this Office Action. This Action is made FINAL. Please Note: The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Withdrawn Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 - Indefiniteness The rejection of claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as set forth on pages 2-3 of the Office Action of 08/01/2025 is withdrawn in light of the amendments to the claims. Maintained Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 – Scope of Enablement Modifies as Necessitated by Claim Amendments Claims 16,19-23 and 25-32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, because the specification, while being enabling for: A method of treatment of pathological cardiac hypertrophy and/or reducing the risk of pathological cardiac hypertrophy in a human subject, by administering to said human subject a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound for promoting expression and/or activity of the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) H19, wherein the compound is: (a) a nucleic acid sequence which comprises or consists of the nucleic acid sequence encoding H19, (b) an expression vector expressing the nucleic acid sequence as defined in (a), or (c) a host comprising the expression vector of (b), and wherein the expression of the nucleic acid sequence is under the control of a heart-specific promotor, and the nucleic acid sequence of the compound comprises SEQ ID NO: 12. does not reasonably provide enablement for the methods as claimed that encompass any lncRNA H19 sequence for the treatment of a human subject. The specification does not enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the invention commensurate in scope with these claims. Nature of the invention and breadth of the claims The claims are directed to the treatment of cardiac hypertrophy, or reduction of the risk of cardiac hypertrophy, in a human subject. The claims broadly encompass the treatment of the human subject (as recited in the claims) with a nucleic acid that encodes any H19 gene (i.e.: an H19 gene from any non-human organism is encompassed by the treatments of the claims). The claims thus encompass a broad range of compositions, with a wide variety of sequences and non-established biological effects in humans, with a required functionality of treatment or risk reduction. Direction provided by the specification and working example The instant application teaches an analysis of gene expression of lncRNAs related to cardiac hypertrophy. The specification teaches (p.50; p.57) that in an analysis of heart tissue samples of TAC mouse model subjects, H19 was down regulated. The specification further teaches (p.60) that H19 is down regulated in a human hypertrophic heart tissue. The specification teaches (p.61) that overexpression of H19 under the control of a cardiac-specific promoter in a mouse model system can have beneficial effects; and that overexpression of H19 in a mouse cardiac cell line can have a beneficial effect on cell size (p.60). The specification does not teach the analysis of any subject other than mouse or human. The specification does not teach any compositions other than nucleic acid systems for the increase of H19 expression. The specification does not teach any particular activities of H19 that are increased in the analysis of H19 expression in cells. The specification does not teach any lcRNA H19 sequence other than SEQ ID NO: 12 as relevant to human biology. State of the art, level of skill in the art, and level of unpredictability While level of skill in the art with regard to detecting an expression level of any particular nucleic acid sequence in sample is high, and the state of the art is advanced, the unpredictability in modifying the expression level of any particular nucleic acid for beneficial effects on a pathology in a particular orgnaism are greater. Such unpredictability is demonstrated by the related art. Because the claims are directed to the treatment of human subjects, and encompass the use of an H19 lncRNA from any organism, while the specification teaches only analyses relevant to human and mouse, it is relevant to point out the unpredictability in correlating expression of genes among multiple different subject organisms with a particular phenotype. For example, sequences that appear quite similar may in fact have very different functionalities. Such a possibility is exemplified by Juppner (1995), which teaches that despite significant structural conservation, rat, opossum, and human PTH/PTHrP receptor homologs display distinct functional characteristics (Abstract; pp.39S-40S). It is unpredictable if, for example, the rat, mouse, or pig homologs of human H19 can be used to practice the invention in those or other organisms. Relevant to this encompassed breadth of the claims (i.e.: treatment of a human with an H19 lcRNA from any non-human organism), Brannan et al (1990; cited on the IDS of 07/12/2022) provides that even in mammalian organisms such as human and mouse, the H19 lcRNA sequences shows regions which lack a high degree of conservation (e.g.: Fig. 1; p.29 - Comparison of the human and murine H19 genes). Conclusion Taking into consideration the factors outlined above, including the nature of the invention and scope of the claims, the state of the art and its high level of unpredictability, the lack of guidance by the applicant and the specific examples, it is the conclusion that an undue amount of experimentation would be required to use the invention as claimed in the full scope as claimed. Withdrawn Double Patenting The rejection of claims for issues related to double patenting, as set forth on pages 7-8 of the Office Action of 08/01/2025 is withdrawn in light of the terminal disclaimer filed on 11/03/2025, which is approved. Conclusion No claim is allowed. Applicant's amendment necessitated any new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN THOMAS KAPUSHOC whose telephone number is (571)272-3312. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anne Gussow can be reached at 571-272-6047. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Stephen Kapushoc Primary Examiner Art Unit 1683 /STEPHEN T KAPUSHOC/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1683
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 12, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Nov 03, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Final Rejection — §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595511
METHODS USING CHARACTERISTICS OF URINARY AND OTHER DNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590331
METHODS OF DETERMINING WHETHER A SUBJECT HAS OR IS AT RISK OF HAVING A CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577618
METHOD FOR SELECTING SPERMATOZOA, IN PARTICULAR FOR MEDICALLY ASSISTED PROCREATION (MAP)
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571798
CANCER BIOMARKERS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571049
THERAPEUTIC TREATMENT OF SELECT DIFFUSE LARGE B CELL LYMPHOMAS EXHIBITING DISTINCT PATHOGENIC MECHANISMS AND OUTCOMES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+52.9%)
3y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 728 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month